Did Romney Lose Conservative Media?

The right’s reception of Mitt Romney’s health care speech in Ann Arbor last week was pretty icy. The vaunted Wall Street Journal op-ed page savaged the him before and after the event. National Review‘s editors declared it a “failure.” The Washington Examiner‘s Philip Klein headlined his analysis “Romney makes passionate case for violating personal freedom at state level.” So, is he permanently tarnished? No.

Romney got plenty of glowing coverage this week. Newt Gingrich certainly made it easier, drawing heat off Romney by mounting his own defense of state-level individual health insurance mandates on Sunday and breaking with party dogma on Paul Ryan’s entitlement proposals. But there’s something else going on.

Matt Drudge led with an item showcasing Romney’s Monday phone-a-thon fundraiser for most of Tuesday. Rush Limbaugh, off on a tangent about Gingrich, said the following in handicapping the field: “Look, Romney is obviously the front-runner now with all the money. They’re saying Romney’s gonna be able to raise a billion dollars, too. Romney raised something like $10 million in eight hours.” This week’s gushing isn’t just about money per se. It’s about electability.

It’s Obama who’s raised expectations for a $1 billion-plus campaign. With potential Republicans passing or imploding left and right, the party is clearly looking for an answer. If Romney convinces conservative media that he’s the only one with the juice to test Obama, everything else becomes an afterthought. The same goes for many Republican primary voters.

Related Topics: 2012, gop, Mitt Romney
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus