No Quarter for Gingrich, but Gleeful Sympathy from Democrats

Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images
Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images

“I made a mistake,” Newt Gingrich said Tuesday night, the latest in a series of mea culpas designed to resuscitate a campaign that conservative commentators believe to be on life support. After calling Paul Ryan to apologize for characterizing the House Republican budget as a “radical” plan that amounts to “right-wing social engineering,” Gingrich said during an interview with Fox News that he was behind Ryan. “The budget vote is one that I am happy to say I would have voted for,” he said.

As the GOP picks over the wreckage of Gingrich’s presidential launch, Democrats are rubbernecking at the crash site with delight. In a conference call with reporters Wednesday morning, Senator Chuck Schumer argued the hailstorm of criticism suggests Ryan’s blueprint to overhaul Medicare, already backed by House Republicans, has become party doctrine–a development that will help Democrats hold the White House in 2012. “These events suggest that the new litmus test within the Republican Party will be how you come down on Paul Ryan’s Medicare plan. The pressure from the right is going to inflict a heavy political toll on these Republicans. It’s a no-win for them,” Schumer said. “If Republicans make endorsing the Ryan plan the standard in their presidential primary, it will make their nominee virtually unelectable in the general election.”

Gingrich has argued that since he has disavowed his criticism of the Republican budget, Democrats would be dishonest to use his comments against GOP congressional candidates. But Schumer said the party, whose campaign committees have already cut a slew of ads battering House Republicans for attacking Medicare, would make the proposal the linchpin of a relentless messaging campaign. “If Republicans want to double down on the Ryan plan to end Medicare, that’s up to them. But they should know: it’s never going to pass, and we will not miss a single opportunity to remind the public of what it means for seniors,” Schumer said. “This is actually very good news for us as Democrats in 2012.

The New York Senator expressed gleeful sympathy for the former House Speaker, who he argued was “nearly turned into a political outsider overnight” for daring to break with his party. “Speaker Gingirch’s offense was saying what everyone else knows: that the House Republican plan is extreme. It’s a major liability. He is the Republican canary in a coal mine. When that canary speaks truth, he is snuffed out.”

Gingrich did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Update, 3:40 p.m.: Gingrich’s spokesman, Rick Tyler, sends the Huffington Post this statement blaming the candidate’s problems on the press:

“The literati sent out their minions to do their bidding,” Tyler wrote. “Washington cannot tolerate threats from outsiders who might disrupt their comfortable world. The firefight started when the cowardly sensed weakness. They fired timidly at first, then the sheep not wanting to be dropped from the establishment’s cocktail party invite list unloaded their entire clip, firing without taking aim their distortions and falsehoods. Now they are left exposed by their bylines and handles. But surely they had killed him off. This is the way it always worked. A lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught. But out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged Gingrich, once again ready to lead those who won’t be intimated by the political elite and are ready to take on the challenges America faces.”

Related Topics: 2012, chuck schumer, gop, newt gingrich, Republican Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus