Pawlenty Had That Not-So-Special Something Republicans Need in 2012

As Adam mentioned, on paper, Tim Pawlenty fit the profile of the perfect Republican presidential candidate: A blue-state governor with blue-collar roots, a conservative evangelical with potential appeal to the Tea Party and establishment wings of the GOP. (Was his staff really that savvy? I’ll have to take Adam’s word for it.) But Pawlenty had another defining characteristic that made him an absolutely ideal challenger to President Obama, a characteristic that’s worth mentioning, because all the remaining Republican candidates lack it.

He’s boring!

Even with the economy sputtering and unemployment at 9%, Obama polls better than the big-name Republican candidates nationally and in battleground states. But he doesn’t do so well when pitted against a generic Republican. And that’s Pawlenty, the ultimate generic Republican.

Republicans want the 2012 election to be a referendum on the President. The Obama campaign wants it to be a choice between the president and an unpalatable alternative. That’s why Obama is hoping the Republicans nominate someone from Crazyville, whether it’s Rick Perry (an extremist who looks like a President out of central casting) or Michelle Bachmann (an extremist who looks like a stalker from the planet Zorb). I suspect Obama would have a different kind of field day with Mitt Romney, a non-extremist (although he sometimes plays one on TV) who looks like, as Mike Huckabee once said, the guy who laid you off, and sounds like a guy who would say anything to get elected.

Jon Huntsman would be a disaster for Obama, but it’s hard to see how an Obama appointee who thought the Obama stimulus was too small gets through a Republican primary. Otherwise, Obama’s worst nightmare—except maybe Marco Rubio—is a pleasant-looking but forgettable Obama critic with no charisma and no major skeletons. So far, Obama seems to have ducked the plausible dull Republicans – John Thune, Mitch Daniels (who isn’t actually dull but seems dull) and now Pawlenty.

It’s true, as Adam said, that Pawlenty never “ignited passion in Republican voters.” But next fall, the GOP nominee won’t need to do that. Obama will do that.

Related Topics: 2012, gop, pawlenty, Viewpoint
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus