Ron Paul Leaving Congress

Ron Paul announced on Tuesday that he won’t seek re-election to Congress while he runs (again) for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination. Hey wait: Ron Paul is still in Congress? Okay, I knew that. But a lot of Americans may think of him as both something more and something less than a congressman — a free-floating permanent talking head-slash-presidential candidate. So what does this mean? Probably not much. At 75-years-old, Paul probably doesn’t have a whole lot of political mileage left in him anyway. His Galveston, Texas area district is likely to replace him with another conservative Republican. As for his presidential prospects, the Texas Congressman says he’s decided it makes sense to focus on just one race to improve his (extremely long) presidential odds. But it hardly seems that the chief obstacle to Paul’s presidential aspirations has been the distraction of a Congressional re-elect.

In fact, as Paul continues to rate low in GOP presidential polling (though often better than some more “legitimate” candidates, like Tim Pawlenty, Jon Huntsman and Newt Gingrich) it’s worth pausing to marvel at how little he has broadened his appeal since 2008. Paul is, after all, credited as the godfather of the Tea Party movement. Some of his once-fringy economic ideas have gained traction within the GOP, and the ongoing global economic crisis has provided endless new more grist for his apocalyptic financial theories. Republicans even seen to be growing less internationalist and more in line with his neo-isolationist views. But Paul remains a fairly negligible presence in the Republican race, and frankly it’s hard to see how giving up his House seat is going to change that.

Related Topics: Retirements
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus