Pawlenty’s Moment

Tim Pawlenty has already been running for President for weeks and even months now. But candidates nowadays stretch out the process of announcing their candidacies into as many incremental steps as possible, including the establishment of a “leadership” PAC and an exploratory committee. Pawlenty even had to take back an unintentional declaration of his candidacy on CNN a few weeks ago to preserve the opportunity for his official kickoff, which his campaign now says will occur on Monday.

Two things to note about this announcement. One, Pawlenty is not making it from his home state of Minnesota, but from Des Moines, Iowa, underscoring how important the Iowa caucuses will be to his candidacy. Pawlenty will likely have trouble keeping up with the fundraising (and personal fortunes) of Mitt Romney and Jon Hunstman, and with the potential financial power of Newt, Inc. But he’s hoping that a win in Iowa will command national attention and bring in a sudden flood of money–as it did for Mike Huckabee in 2008–thereby catapulting him into the later states. (A poor showing in Iowa, particularly given his advantage of coming from a neighboring state, could mortally wound his candidacy.)

The second is that his timing is pretty good. As I argued in my new profile of Pawlenty in this week’s issue, he is likely due for a closer look than he’s gotten so far. At the moment the GOP field doesn’t offer much. Mitt Romney is the frontrunner, Huntsman is an unknown quantity, Gingrich is already in deep trouble, and the other candidates–from Rick Santorum to Gary Johnson–don’t seem like plausible nominees. Now is the moment when Pawlenty needs to remind Republicans looking for an alternative to Romney that he’s here, and to get them to focus on him. We’ll see whether he can do it.

Related Topics: Tim Pawlenty
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus