Exit Jim Jones

As long rumored, Jim Jones will be leaving this month as Barack Obama’s national security advisor. This was never a snug fit; Jones complained that he had less access to and sway over Obama than some more junior staffers, notably NSC chief of staff Denis McDonough, one of the most quietly influential figures in the White House, and Jones was rewarded with plenty of sniping from unnamed rivals around him. While Jones seems to have outmaneuvered at least one of his alleged detractors, he never emerged as the strong figure many people expected the former top NATO commander to be.

One reason may have been his lack of a strong personal relationship with the president. Obama tapped Jones for the job after having met him only twice. He may have been more focused on the useful symbolism of bringing a military man with Republican ties onto his team. It’s also possible that Obama heeded the words of foreign policy mandarins who said that Condoleezza rice was too close to George W. Bush to be the sort of neutral arbiter the job demands, and that Rice failed the president by not acting as a more independent broker of dissenting opinions. Whatever the rationale, Jones never seemed to become a true Obama confidante, and much of the heavy lifting on the NSC fell to his deputy, Tom Donilon, who will now replace him. Here’s a passage on Donilon from a story I wrote last year:

While Jones oversees the national security structure from above, it is Donilon who spends the most time sitting down with lesser-known officials from across the government to flesh out policy options before they reach the Oval Office. “He’s the key guy setting the parameters of national security policy discussion and decision-making,” says one person familiar with the NSC system. Even more so than Jones, in fact, Donilon is foremost a process guy. A lawyer by training, Donilon made his name as a political operative under Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale–”a fierce partisan,” says a friend–later playing key roles in Joe Biden’s 1988 and 2008 presidential bids. When, in the Clinton administration, his law-firm colleague Warren Christopher became secretary of state, Donilon followed him to Foggy Bottom as Christopher’s chief of staff. Today, Donilon leads what in government parlance are known as “deputies meetings,” in which second-tier officials coordinate policies and hash out competing positions before either reaching decisions or kicking issues up the chain to “principals meetings”–which usually feature cabinet secretaries, Jones, and Biden. In a busy stretch, Donilon might lead as many as four deputies meetings in one day.

Good luck to Donilon; with multiple big foreign policy threats stacked up, he’ll certainly need it. (The NYT‘s David Sanger notes, by the way, that Donilon is a skeptic of the Afghanistan war and a strong supporter of a non-trivial withdrawal process beginning next summer.)

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • destor23

    I wish the press would get over the “symbolism” of Democrats using Republicans in military and security positions. It’s not as if there are perfectly qualified Democrats out there for all of those jobs.

    Nobody in the press ever implies that Republican presidents should appoint Democrats to these types of jobs. Why is that?

  • michaelfury

    “National Security Adviser James Jones reported $900,000 in salary and bonus from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as well as director fees from a number of corporations. He received, for example, $330,000 from Boeing Corp. and $290,000 from Chevron Corp.”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/05/11/the-gas-must-flow/

  • Paul-no not that one

    “One reason may have been”…”It’s also possible”..”He may have been”
    .
    Beltway parlor games. Fun!
    .

  • stuartzechman

    Jones never seemed to become a true Obama confidante
    .
    Good to know that the personalities and relationships at Versailles are as courtly as ever.
    .
    Thanks God we’re ruled by these fine, mannered people, and not by ourselves.

  • Paul-no not that one

    I’m stunned that you take Crowley’s impressions of relationships he isn’t privy to seriously.

  • stuartzechman

    I don’t, but Crowley obviously does.

  • groenhagen2

    Name a qualified Democrat.

  • groenhagen2

    Obama never got close to Jones because he is uncomfortable around the military. The little punk’s mentors, e.g., Jeremiah Wright and Frank Marshall Davis, are America haters, and what is a greater symbol of American power than our military?

  • groenhagen2

    Good for him. He was one of the few members of the punk’s admin who had experience in the private sector. Maybe the punk should have put him on his economic team, which has been a miserable failure.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “and what is a greater symbol of American power than our military?”
    .
    The Constitution.

  • m0mentom0ri

    A tip often given to young creative writers is to make your protagonist ‘relatable’ in the first few pages. This is generally accomplished by having that character do something that the average person can relate to – being late for work, arguing with a coworker, et al.
    .
    I sometimes wonder if the interpersonal stories so often used by reporters is their attempt to appropriate the ‘relatable lead’ trick from fiction writing. Get the reader to attach emotionally to the personalities they’re reporting on. That’s why we’re getting so much “there are tensions between…”, and “gets along well with…”, etc etc. We can all relate to interpersonal conflict.
    .
    It’s terrible trend for journalism, but a possible explanation of why the news reads more like fiction these days, and less like reporting.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Paulnot, FTW.

  • Paul-no not that one

    From the Sanger link-
    .
    “As deputy national security adviser, Mr. Donilon has urged what he calls a “rebalancing” of American foreign policy to rapidly disengage American forces in Iraq and to focus more on China, Iran and other emerging challenges. In the Afghanistan-Pakistan review, he argued that the United States could not engage in what he termed “endless war,” and has strongly defended Mr. Obama’s decision to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan next summer.”
    .
    He seems to be a step in the right direction.

  • Michael Crowley

    I sometimes wonder if the interpersonal stories so often used by reporters is their attempt to appropriate the ‘relatable lead’ trick from fiction writing. Get the reader to attach emotionally to the personalities they’re reporting on. That’s why we’re getting so much “there are tensions between…”, and “gets along well with…”, etc etc. We can all relate to interpersonal conflict.
    .
    It’s true that lots of people do relate to those personal dynamics. It’s also true that pretty much every single person I know who has worked in government describes interpersonal relationships as having a critical impact on policy outcomes. The same goes for reams of serious journalistic and scholarly writing. (Check out the seminal political science text, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy, for instance.) There’s a lot more to government than that, but it’s lazy and actually ignorant to sneer about supposedly trivial “parlor games.” If you don’t understand the role “parlor games” played in the Bush administration, for instance, then you don’t fully understand why we invaded Iraq.

  • Paul-no not that one

    The “parlor games” wasn’t directed at what may or may not be happening in the White House.
    .
    It was directed at your speculation.
    .
    It seems, it may, it’s possible. Everything that follows from those qualifiers a reader should take with a large grain of salt.
    .
    But thanks for weighing into the comment section.
    .
    We appreciate it.

  • m0mentom0ri

    Thank you for replying, Mr Crowley.
    .
    “It’s also true that pretty much every single person I know who has worked in government describes interpersonal relationships as having a critical impact on policy outcomes.”
    .
    This is true of most workplaces, not just the government.
    .
    My point was that there seems to be a trend in journalism where the nuance of interpersonal relationships takes priority over the substance of the issue. It’s one thing to state that ‘McCain is a maverick’ or ‘Obama is aloof”, its another to talk about how often they’ve voted with their party or how often they blow-off supporters. Lately, there’s been a lot more about how politicians feel, than what they actually do.
    .
    This is not a specific criticism of your article, Mr Crowley, but more of a general critique of your industry. I know more about Alvin Greene’s rap career and Christine O’Donnell’s dabbling in alternative spirituality than I do either of their positions on Defense spending or entitlement reform. That’s what’s buggin’ me.

  • groenhagen2

    The miltary is part of our Constitution, which, BTW, is another thing the punk and his fellow liberals are not comfortable with.

  • Michael Crowley

    You’re welcome. Personally I am more comfortable with speculation in a blog item as long as it’s identified as such, and readers can take what they will from it. Obviously blogging is sometimes (not always) more like a casual and speculative conversation than the reported journalism that goes into an article. And I find that both readers (though not always commenters!) and people I talk with are frequently interested in such theories when they’re built on a foundation of actual knowledge and reporting.

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks so very much for responding to commentary with additional information, Michael Crowley, it is always greatly appreciated by the highly engaged news users here in commentary.

  • stuartzechman

    PNNTO FTW!

  • Paul-no not that one

    Thanks for explaining your views on blogging.
    .
    It will help inform the reader in the future. I wish all the contributors (but not always the commenters!) did the same.
    .
    Thanks for taking the time.

  • kbanginmotown

    Does this mean we’re “ignorant, sordid idiots” now?
    .
    Jus’ askin’

  • kbanginmotown

    pnnto: FTW!
    gh2: WTF?!?

  • http://rangdao.wordpress.com rangdao

    welcome to our website === w w w ( Lttsy ) – c o m === ..The new update, a large hot ..
    WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT.
    YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

  • apr2563

    Drives me crazy Paul. It seems when a reporter doesn’t have actual facts the maybe’s and whimsical conjectrure takes over. Sort of 1 step down from the annonymous source or aides say…

  • apr2563

    Paul..I join others in my admiration. FTW.

  • herby002

    I’m sorry to be so dense, but what does FTW mean?

    Paulnot, FTW.
    pnnto: FTW!
    gh2: WTF?!?

    (I know what WTF means. I often mutter it when I read groenhagennewfree3xfree screeds, or read Sharron Angle’s latest quote.)

blog comments powered by Disqus