That Huckabust… or Maybe Not

The day with Romney started out with him making not-so-veiled reference to the Huckabee press conference last night, saying “he didn’t fool the people of Iowa” with his negative ad headfake. I talked to a lot of people at the six Romney house parties he held today, and I think Romney is right. Huckabee did not fool the people of Iowa, because they weren’t paying attention.

The “implosion” that the media cackled about yesterday may be happening, but it’s not because of that press conference. Out of the dozen or so caucus-goers I spoke to today (some Romney supporters, some undecided), no one had even heard about that press conference. And I suspect, even if they did, the MSM’s opinion of Mike Huckabee’s performance isn’t the first thing they’re using to evaluate the candidate. Even more telling, considering how disciplined a candidate Romney is, he didn’t bring up Huckabee’s “going negative” again the rest of the day.

Again, this is not to say the implosion is not happening. A few of the people I talked to today did mention recent Huckabee remarks that had tipped their personal scale to Romney… namely, his “bad mouthing” of Bush: Even if they couldn’t remember the invocation of “bunker mentality,” they remembered that Huckabee had said something bad about Bush: “That was a mistake. He shouldn’t have done that.” Others — far fewer, but still present — picked out his various foreign policy slip-ups: “His comments about the situation over in Pakistan… it doesn’t help if you don’t know that they had already lifted martial law. You need to know that stuff.”

Both of those statements also have a lot more to do with actual issues than whatever it is that happened yesterday afternoon. Is this heaven? No, but it is Iowa.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus