Ixnay onway ethay Asxmay Adsway , Okay?

Off the record, rival campaigns are calling Huckabee’s put-the-Christ-back-in-Christmas ad “brilliant.” (More than one campaign used that exact same word.)

And, it’s true, as an ad, it sells Huck well — and (this is the brilliant part) — makes Mitt Romney look like a Grinch. As a political ad it leaves something to be desired. Namely, politics. (See the NYT’s unintentionally hilarious fact check of it here. The Times has a more intentionally humorous take on the candidate here. Watch out for the flying Huck-a-bees!)

Today, we get Rudy’s Christmas ads. Yup, two of ‘em. Guess when you don’t go to church regularly, you have to compensate. They are more political and less Christiany than Huck’s spot (he’s not over compensating, I guess), and not just in their lack of reference to religion.Though they do feature “St. Nick,” Santa Claus. In this one — on the air in New Hampshire — it’s a weirdly vindictive Santa Claus. (Mr. Claus recoils at the notion of wanting all the campaigns to get along… Maybe he’s Satan’s brother.):

And, er, more “humorous” one that’s web-only. (Giuliani seems as serious about giving us all fruitcake as he does our civil liberties. And nothing screams Republican Presidential nominee like a dude in a sweater vest lisping the words “fruit cake!”):

But here’s what bothers me about both of them: Wanting to force your own policies on the entire nation and calling it a “Christmas gift”? Orwell wept. Not only is that selfish, it verges on fascist. Imagine that impulse followed through with on a more traditional wishlist: “Everyone is getting a Wii, damnit! I don’t care what you asked for! Here’s your Wii and you’ll like it. Or I’ll waterboard you. WIIS FOR YOU ALL, BWHAHAHAHAHAHAH!”

(And, er, strictly speaking, shouldn’t “strict constructionist judges” what you get when you’re naughty?)

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    William B. Plowman / NBC

    Why Can’t President Obama Get Surrogates You Can Believe In?

    It’s one of the great unexplained frustrations of the Obama presidency: Perhaps the most telegenic political leader of his generation has not been able to recruit a bench of top-flight, telegenic spinmeisters–called “surrogates” in the business–to fight his battles on cable and network television.

    His top two economic spokespeople during the great decline of 2009–Larry Summers and Tim Geithner–had minds that chafed at the remedial logic of televised debate and voices that mumbled through talking points. His most able economic debater, Austan Goolsbee, had some success but then gave up the White House to return to Chicago and the academy. His top political spokesmen–Robert Gibbs, David Axelrod and David Plouffe–deliver a punch as hard as anyone, but for the same reason rarely elevated the President’s case beyond the ring. His Vice President, Joe Biden, hits his marks, but only when he is on message. The DNC chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, struggles to transcend her Congressional roots. And Bill Daley, the President’s erstwhile chief of staff who was hired in large part because of his surrogate chops, faded from the scene after few unremarkable Sunday show appearances.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Obama’s Health Care Box

    Alec MacGillis of the NewRepublic has been doing some fine campaign reporting this year and here he offers a smart look at what may be the most important state of all in November–Ohio. The most striking part of the piece for me, one that illuminates an essential conundrum for Barack Obama, occurs when MacGillis goes door to door with a labor-affiliated political organizer in a white working-class neighborhood in Columbus:

blog comments powered by Disqus