Amnesty

Nathan Thornburgh reports on what might have been:

Sure, there is a very real national-security threat in having a porous border. But a large — if unquantifiable — percentage of the people crossing that line illegally are not newcomers but rather people who have already established lives in the U.S. and would qualify for amnesty. If they were legalized and free to circulate, we could concentrate on the serious criminals and terrorists crossing the border, not a worker going back to his family.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images

    Political Pictures of the Week, May 11-18

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    The Fact Checking Fun House: Crossroads GPS vs. Team Obama

    Have you seen the latest Crossroads GPS fact check of the Obama Campaign fact check of a Crossroads GPS ad that relies on a fact check by Politifact, but fails to point out that Politifact called the same ad “mostly false”?

    No? Well, then. You have come to the right place. Though we must caution: If you continue reading this post, you do so at significant risk your own faith in the American Democratic process.

blog comments powered by Disqus