Ames-less

Rudy’s announced he’s skipping the Ames Straw Poll; this isn’t super shocking — the campaign was dropping hints about the possibility months ago. Slightly more surprising is his decision to “remain competitive” there nonetheless, i.e., to go ahead in participate in the caucuses — should he win in January, he’d be the first candidate in 30 years to conquer Iowa without buying Ames (according to the Des Moines Register). His departure also raises the possibility that all the front-runners will forgo Ames this year, leaving Mitt Romney and his millions of dollars to buy the whole meaningless circus for himself.

It’s just another sign of a movement toward a functional “national primary” and how that changes the traditional status of Iowa and New Hampshire in the game.

UPDATE: p_l has a good point:

ana, if you think we’re moving toward a “functional” national primary, you’re nuts. Instead, we’re moving to a disfunctional national primary — one in which only candidates who have lots of corporate backers (or lots of their own money) can compete. And a “national primary” that occurs 10 months before the general election has to be described as “disfunctional” as well.

Indeed, we won’t have a “functional” presidential election system until the press starts acting like its job is informing citizens, rather than providing content that will bring the audiences that attract advertisers.

I meant “functional” as in “de facto”: There’s been no federal movement toward it, just a bunch of states trying to race each other into importance. And I agree that the system, both as it stands and the direction it’s heading, is dysfunctional and skewed to value style over substance and almost completely free of actual political content. I’m not sure if that’s entirely the press’s fault — though they’re obviously responsible for their coverage — their readers, the candidates, and the business of media also play roles. The press can pay attention to criticisms and refuse to be spoonfed, however, and, thanks to forums like this, you can call us on it when we forget to.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Rick Santorum Wants to Fight ‘The Dangers Of Contraception’

    Candidates often say things when polling in the single digits that come back to haunt them when they start leading the polls. Last October, Rick Santorum gave an interview with an Evangelical blog called Caffeinated Thoughts, in which he said contraception is “not okay,” and that this would be a public policy issue he would tackle as President. In particular, he said he would “get rid of any idea that you have to have abortion coverage or contraceptive coverage” as a government policy. Start watching the following video at 17:55.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Occupy the Regulatory Open Comment Period!

    There’s nothing “wrong” with protests built around placard-hoisting and park-squatting, but Occupy the SEC is definitely doing something right with its radically different tack. The OWS-offshoot has submitted a 325-page letter to federal financial regulatory agencies on the Volcker Rule, a controversial measure designed to prohibit banks from proprietary trading, or making investments with their own dollars rather than their customers’, that was passed as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

blog comments powered by Disqus