Goodfellas on Trial?

From all the references to getting thrown under a bus, putting one’s “neck in a meat grinder,” and, today, having one’s “feet planted in cement,” you’d think U.S. v Libby was a mob trial.

This White House does have a certain wise guy aspect (you’re either with us or against us), and the defense’s case rests on portraying 1600 Pennsylvania as a nest of vipers, with Libby fighting not to keep his job but to preserve his honor.

Fitzgerald’s case is, on its face, more believable. Libby wanted to avoid being prosecuted for leaking Plame’s name (a key fact for the government is that Libby thought he might have broken the law), so he changed his story. He didn’t get Plame’s name from an official, he got it from reporters.

The government further argues that Libby was frantically marshaling White House support, specifically in the form of a statement from Scott McClellan saying that Libby “had nothing to do” with the leak. And once that happened, Libby was locked into the cover the White House gave him (this situation being the source to the cemented feet metaphor Fitzgerald used).

This morning, with the jury out of the courtroom, Fitzgerald tried to admit clips from the 2003 White House briefings in which McClellan poured the concrete.

The defense tried to argue that the clips were prejudicial… Wells referred to them as a “feeding frenzy” so many times I started to get hungry. The judge eventually agreed to show the jury the clips, if the government edited out the “press people” questions; “it’s clear that the press doesn’t believe what’s being said,” and the jury shouldn’t be contaminated by the press’s incredulity. Hmm.

Fitzgerald contends that Scottie’s statements disprove the defense’s narrative about a tong war (those gangsters again!) between the White House and the office of the vice president. If Scott went out to defend Scooter, how could Scooter possibly then be so overwhelmed with concern about being “sacrificed” by the White House that, four days later, he mixed up his story to the FBI?

The White House had Libby’s back, Fitzgerald said, “it was Mr. McClellan who was in front of the bus.”

He certainly had that look on his face.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus