Mancrush on the Wane?

Some reliable swooners seem to have been underwhelmed by the speech last night. Over at Powerline, John Hinderacker, who memorably once described a meeting with Bush as “the most inspiring forty minutes I’ve experienced in politics” and and Bush himself as a “man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius,” said Bush came across as “stiff, nervous, and anxious to get it over with.” On the plus side? “Words at this point mean little.” Well, that’s one way to put it.

Intriguingly, SwampDad — who might be described as a “Webb Democrat” — was relatively impressed: “At least he’s being honest.” Well, sorta. As my colleague Joe notes, Bush continues to assert that the escalation is an Iraqi plan. Which is news to them.

Indeed, much of the wonkery in Bush’s speech was misleading, if not dishonest (unless, for instance, by “bipartisan” Bush really meant Republican/Connecticut for Lieberman). What gave Bush the veneer of honesty was exactly what Hinderacker seems put off by: The lack of confidence, the nervousness, the inability to look us in the eye. He may still be misleading us, but his heart isn’t in it.

Say this for Clinton: That was never a problem for him.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Why Romney Is Dodging the Press

    Joe, the Romney campaign’s control-freakery makes for bad democracy, but I suspect it’s a smart strategy. Consider the way Mitt’s personal approval rating has bounced back over the past several weeks. As the GOP primaries wrapped up, Romney was roughly as unpopular as late-era George W. Bush. Now he’s about even with Barack Obama.

    Since becoming the presumptive Republican nominee, Romney’s favorable-unfavorable rating has jumped to 50%-41%, his best ever and in the same neighborhood as Obama’s 52%-46% standing.

    What changed? Well, for one thing, other Republican rivals are no longer attacking Romney. That helps. But it’s not like he’s had a free ride: the Obama camp has picked up where Rick and Newt left off. An alternate explanation would be that Americans are simply seeing less of Romney, and that makes them like him better.

    For Obama, gay marriage stance born of a long evolutionHuffPost Politics

    Crossroads, Super PACs and the Incumbent Advertising Gap

    In a recent piece about the Obama-Romney ad wars, Michael Scherer made the smart point that this election is different from past ones in that the incumbent no longer gets a free hit on his rival during the period immediately following the primary. The reason: super PACs have the cash to cover that gap while the challenger collects enough general election funds to keep pace.

blog comments powered by Disqus