House Passes Debt Ceiling Increase

The 221-201 vote came hours after Speaker John Boehner announced that his fractured party would relent and not seek to add other items to the must-pass legislation

  • Share
  • Read Later

WASHINGTON (AP) — The GOP-controlled House has backed away from a battle over the government’s debt cap and passed a measure extending Treasury’s borrowing authority with overwhelming support from President Barack Obama‘s Democratic allies.

The 221-201 vote came hours after Speaker John Boehner announced that his fractured party would relent and not seek to add other items to the must-pass legislation.

Twenty-eight Republicans voted yes. The bill would permit Treasury to borrow normally for another 13 months and would diffuse the chance of a debt crisis well past the November elections.

Just Monday, Republicans suggested pairing the debt measure with legislation to roll back a recent cut in the inflation adjustment of pension benefits for working age military retirees.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.

Unwilling to risk spooking the markets, and leading a fractured GOP majority, House Speaker John Boehner on Tuesday stepped back from a confrontation with Democrats to let Congress vote on increasing the government’s borrowing cap without trying to extract any concessions from the White House.

The move risks more displeasure from the tea party but came after most Republicans in the House made clear they had no taste for another high-stakes fight with President Barack Obama over the nation’s debt ceiling, which must be raised so the government can borrow money to pay all of its bills.

A vote was scheduled for Tuesday evening, with Democrats lined up to provide the bulk of support to pass the measure; the Senate was expected to pass the bill and send it to Obama by the end of the week.

The vote comes four months after Washington diffused a government shutdown and debt crisis that burned Republicans politically — an experience they did not want to repeat.

Tuesday’s developments, which many Capitol Hill insiders saw coming, marks a major reversal of the GOP’s strategy of trying to use the debt limit to force spending cuts or other concessions on Obama. The president yielded to such demands in 2011 — before his re-election — but has since boxed in Republicans by refusing to negotiate.

Boehner, R-Ohio, made the announcement after conservatives failed to rally around his latest plan, floated Monday, to tie lifting the debt ceiling to a measure to reverse cuts to military pensions that were enacted less than two months ago. Earlier plans to tie a debt cap increase to approval of the Keystone XL pipeline or repeal of part of the new health care law failed as well, stymied by a group of hard line conservatives who vowed never to vote for increasing the government’s debt, which stands at more than $17 trillion.

The measure does not raise the debt limit by a set amount but would suspend it through March 15 of next year to allow Treasury to borrow the money it needs to pay bills like Social Security benefits, payments on government debt, and checks for federal workers.

The move reflects a return to the old ways of handling the politically tricky debt ceiling vote in which the president’s party is expected to carry most of the load to pass it.

“We’ll let the Democrats put the votes up,” the speaker said. “We’ll put a minimum number of (GOP) votes up to get it passed.”

“That’s how it’s supposed to work,” said Vice President Joe Biden at the Capitol after swearing in the newest senator, John Walsh, D-Mont.

Boehner said his inability to assemble 218 GOP votes — enough to win a floor vote — for any debt limit plan left him no alternative but to turn to Democrats.

“When you don’t have 218 votes, you have nothing,” Boehner said. “We’ve seen that before and we see it again.” He said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., promised him sweeping Democratic support in the vote. More than 180 Democrats have signed a letter pledging to vote for a clean increase in the debt cap.

The White House applauded the move. Gene Sperling, director of the White House’s National Economic Council, said the administration hopes Tuesday’s development means “that the tactic of threatening default or threatening the full faith and credit of the United States for budget debates is over, off the table and never is going to happen again. And if so that would, I think, be a boost for confidence and investment in the US.”

Obama’s refusal to negotiate, GOP disunity, and Boehner’s determination to avoid the possibility of a market-cratering default on U.S. obligations gave the Ohio Republican little choice but to announce the vote on a “clean” debt ceiling increase.

“It’s disappointing but we have an intractable White House,” said Rep. Doug LaMalfa, D-Calif. “This is a hard deal for us but it’s also important that we keep the country operating and the financial markets stable, so this is the thing we have to take until somehow there’s a change in attitude in the Senate or the White House or a change of occupancy of the Senate or the White House.”

The announcement amounted to resigned defeat for a party that has sought to use must-pass debt ceiling measures as leverage to force spending cuts on Democrats. Republicans won more than $2 trillion in spending cuts in a 2011 showdown, but gave Obama two debt limit increases last year with only modest add-ons.

“The Democrats got burned when we negotiated and that led to the sequester, and we learned our lesson,” said Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt. “And the Republicans got burned when they shut the government down.”

The House voted 326-90 Tuesday on separate legislation to restore full cost-of-living increases that were to have been cut by 1 percent for retirees under 62. The cuts, which had just passed in December, were backed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis. Repealing them would cost $7 billion over the coming decade, the Congressional Budget Office said Monday.

The reduction sparked an uproar among advocates for veterans, and lawmakers in both parties are scrambling to repeal it.


Aw, the GOP'er's sound so sad.  They actually (were forced to) cast a vote for something that did no damage to the country and they are all bummed out!

Going forward I have two suggestions for these political goons who say one thing and do another;

1.  DO YOUR JOBS!  Work for the general welfare and prosperity of this nation.  Both the GOP and the Democrats have good ideas and valid concerns as they consider the issues this nation faces.  A team approach is much better then a Tea Party extremist approach.

3.  FIX THE DEBT!  There is a viable and reasonable plan created by a bi-partisan private think tank with no political interests that will a. balance the budget, b. improve revenue, c. reduce and eventually eliminate the deficit, d. reduce spending, and c. work to reduce the national debt all without resorting to crisis management or taking the country hostage.

Stop thinking about the next election and start doing the jobs We the People have sent you to D.C. to do.


I'm usually not one to say much positively about Republican strategy, but the press has it all wrong in this case. The Republicans win here. Not only do the majority of them get to say that they voted against a debt ceiling increase, but they avoid another toxic dip in approval ratings during an election year. A debt-ceiling standoff would have brought their historic levels of obstruction back into the full spotlight of the media, which is the last thing the Republicans want (considering they actually may have a reasonable chance of taking back the Senate).


When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for EVERYBODY, what do we have over periods of time?
We have fewer and fewer White children
When we mix more and more non-Whites with fewer and fewer Whites in the same living space?
In time, White extinction. Its genocide because this doesn’t happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer
How is this not White geNOcide?
Anti-racist is a code for anti-white


Wow, they did their job. Amazing.



I believe you are right Mr. Zac.  Politically they actually avoided a show down that would have resulted in more dissatisfaction by the country at large.  But their action was politically motivated as they cast their eyes on next November and not motivated by anything that would contribute to the general welfare of the nation.  Of course avoiding another stupid shut down of the government is a plus.  But my contention is their motivation is all wrong.

They need to think in terms of what is beneficial for this nation and not what is beneficial for the Republican Party.


@EdwardWPWW It is called progress...if you don't like it.....leave. BTW: Most of the "mixing" is by choice not forced.



I don't see you gaining any traction here Mr. Edward.  Everyone here see's your divisive, hateful and bigoted rhetoric for what it is.


@ARTRaveler  They didn't have much choice.   Wall Street spoke; they listened.  



Wall St. is also telling them to pass immigration reform.  I wonder what's stopping them?