- “Just a month before a peace conference that will seek an end to the grinding civil war in Syria, the Obama administration’s decision to suspend the delivery of nonlethal aid to the moderate opposition demonstrated again the frustrations of trying to cultivate a viable alternative to President Bashar al-Assad.” [NYT]
- “House Republican leaders threw their weight behind a two-year budget deal, planning to bring it to a vote Thursday as opposition in both parties failed to gain enough traction to threaten passage.” [WSJ]
- “Several leading Democrats warned Wednesday that the budget deal worked out by House and Senate negotiators is on the verge of unraveling over the exclusion of federal unemployment benefits.” [Hill]
- “Senate Republicans scrubbing the Ryan-Murray budget deal have come across a little-noticed provision that will limit the GOP’s ability to block tax increases in future years.” [National Review]
- How some agencies avoided sequester cuts [WashPost]
- Senate Pulls All Nighter on Post-Nuclear Nominations [TIME]
- Why Wall Street is fed up with the White House—and Republicans too [Politico]
- Redskins bench RGIII [ESPN]
Hey, question for everyone.
CNN's got a line in their article on the budget deal:
"It was the first full budget agreement by a divided Congress -- in which different parties control the House and Senate -- since 1986, Ryan boasted in announcing the deal."
Aside from 2011 to present, how many years since 1986 has Congress been in that sort of situation where House and Senate are held by different parties?
He was seen as someone in favor of economic development and economic ties with China which has generally been interpreted to mean opposed to the temper tantrums. It's possible that it's more about the weakening relationship with China but.....I have very limited faith on that front.
Diane Gramley, president of the America Family Association of Pennsylvania, says it is "ridiculous" to spend tax dollars fighting AIDS because "the government is not doing its part in stopping this epidemic simply because they are promoting the lifestyle." - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-wing-leftovers-121213#sthash.ld4z5orr.dpuf
Fox's Favorite Right-Wing Legal Group Applauds India's Ban On Gay Sex
So former Actress turned politician (Nova Scotia Provincial) Lenore Zann got into a twitter shouting match with someone who tweeted a topless photo of her (from her acting days) with the line "Hey Lenore Zann, where's the old Lenore now"
This is what a well regulated country looks like:
This comes after rumors that the existing big 3 cell phone companies were considering raising their roaming charges charged against startup competitors who use the big 3's networks whenever customers are outside their small networks than they would against International non-competitors who's customers might happen to be visiting.
"Frankly I think they're misleading their followers. I think they're pushing our members in places where they want to be. And frankly I just think they've lost all credibility," he told reporters at his weekly press conference Thursday. "There comes a point when people step over the line. When you criticize something and you have no idea what you're criticizing, it undermines your credibility."
- Rand Paul, (or maybe Boehner) talking about collie
@collioure Not sure about degree of lie but on scale (number impacted) and memorability, probably deserving.
According to this, 2001:
Does Obama have any nephews?
Yes they are. By continuing to push for a "do as I say and I say don't have sex unless you're married" policy of sex education, the Government is implicit in the continued failure of young men and women everywhere conducting unsafe sex practices unaware of the risks to their own health that they are taking.
@forgottenlord Hm, I'm not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, the kid was being a moron. And he should have taken down the photo when she asked him. An apology would have been nice, too.
But as to whether it rises to the level of cyberbullying, I don't know. It seems like a bit of a stretch.
@forgottenlord Wow, you all actually make your corporations behave? Doesn't that, like, make Jesus cry or something?
It's hard to tell when he's full of shiat or when he speaks plainly. And it's a little bit too late to even give a fig.
You earn that title every day.
Huh? Aside from possibly suggesting that Obama was the executed uncle - and that makes no sense - I have no clue what you're getting at
I'd poff you, but I'm going to refrain so others can see how low you're stooping.
Either you have a fierce, abiding hatred of Obama, or you're taking a sh!t.
Congrats. You're meeting every expectation I've had of you since you began your new occupation as apologist for racist behavior this last Sunday.
And yet somehow its not the lack of sex ed and availability of condoms that is at fault, but the fact that we don't execute gays on site.
I know what you mean. What really bugs me is the line he used 'cause good God that's disgusting. But on the complete reverse side.....she's a public figure and we normally tolerate abnormally vitriolic statements about public figures. And the kid's argument that it's already on the Internet isn't wrong.
Our corporations are weird.
There's 4 big media and communication companies: Rogers, Shaw, Telus and Bell. Telus and Bell both started as phone companies, Rogers and Shaw both started as Cable companies. Today, all are in the phone industry (landline), all but Shaw are in Cell Phones (Shaw's said they won't be getting in), all are in Internet, all are in TV provider. They account for something like 99.9% of all infrastructure in the entire country for those four fields with only Cell Phones really having any competition. Only two of them are in any city but because of their separate starting points, two of them are in just about every city (Rogers and Bell in the East, Telus and Shaw in the West - though there's a lot of mixing - I think Vancouver has Rogers rather than Shaw).
Every phone company, nearly every Internet provider (some have their own networks), every Cable provider - they send all of their data across the networks built by those 4 companies because of the laws of the land. Shaw might be dominant for Cable in Edmonton, but they have to sell their surplus to a myriad of cable companies across Edmonton who try to compete with Shaw for using Shaw's own network - and this is tightly regulated. So we end up having some degree of competition....in a very warped way.
They also, combined, own some absurd percentage of all TV and Radio channels and are dominant for Canadian owned broadcasters.
EDIT: Forgot completely why I used the word weird. Ok, so they each have their own reputations despite this regulation. And the weird thing is....Telus and Bell, the phone companies, are seen as money grubbing, customer gouging a-holes who don't care at all about their customers while Shaw and Rogers are seen as good....for Corporations. I mean...you still have the problem of the Cable bill going up 5X inflation because they aren't pushing back on TV Providers enough but.....yeah.
I keep telling you people, Reagan and Jesus are not the same person!
Actually you have called at least 8 people on here that I can recall. But by all means proceed Governor.
Mathis, too bad liberals have no sense of humor.
He's dipping to new lows.
Wonder why he just didn't mention his own daughters. But nevermind, that's rhetorical. I already know:
Probably because doing it this way provides deniability.
@collioure @MementoMori @forgottenlord
Uhmm, the uncle (who was executed by his nephew) was in favor of economic development.
You failed in two directions at once. Well done.
That was one of the dumbest and most offensive things you have posted yet. So sad when stupid people try to be funny.
I guess India counts as off-site?
@forgottenlord @Sue_N And she has to know that people aren't going to pretend that her previous career never happened. If an American pol had appeared nude in any TV show before running for office, the pics would be everywhere.
Still, this kid needs a stern talking to from someone. There's a way to treat people, and that ain't it.
You mean Jesus did not fund ethnic cleansing and provide targeting coordinates for chemical use on civilians?
So scary that IF it happens it will be for a fourthnight and then never be heard from. What power they might gain will be cyclical and temporary. They've already p!ssed of everyone other then white older and male and now on top of that they're decided to bring out the GOP civil war for 2014.
They're a bunch of winners.
Pretty scary that they're going to take over the Senate, isn't it?
The role model for today's GOP might be the Conservative Party in the UK.
Indiana has a concentration of mole people. They often congregate in fast food restaurants on interstates.
India has a very backward male-dominated social code.
Indiana is where the Indians live?
Once more with feeling
You earn that title every day.