Report: CIA Likely to Continue Running Drone War

Handoff of drone program to Defense Department not likely to happen anytime soon

  • Share
  • Read Later

Like TIME on Facebook for more breaking news and current events from around the globe!

Control of the controversial unmanned U.S. drone program may not be moving from the CIA to the Pentagon, after all.

During a speech at the National Defense University in May, President Barack Obama called for more transparency on the use of drones for targeted killings, while at the same time, information leaked that the drone program would shift from the CIA to the Department of Defense. But a report published in Foreign Policy magazine, citing anonymous U.S. officials, says the transfer of drone operations has stalled, and that operational differences between the CIA and the Pentagon make it unlikely that the shift will happen in the near future. There are complex legal issues that govern the CIA and DOD operations, and discussions of whether shifting the program would change its legal status have further slowed down the move, according to Foreign Policy.

But another unnamed official said nothing has changed.

“This is the policy, and we’re moving toward that policy, but it will take some time,” the official said. “The notion that there has been some sort of policy reversal is just not accurate. I think from the moment the policy was announced it was clear it was not something that would occur overnight or immediately.”

While the use of drones is down from its peak in 2010, when there were an estimated 122 attacks in Pakistan alone, drone strikes are still a crucial component of Obama’s counter-terrorism policies. Last week, a drone strike killed the leader of the Pakistani Taliban, just days after Pakistan’s prime minister met with Obama and publicly urged a halt to drone strikes in his country.

[Foreign Policy]

4 comments
WilliamWMorgan
WilliamWMorgan

We must think that it is not the CIA that has authorised and is running the drone program. The CIA is an abstract entity, and can not think, create ideas, take action. And be responsible for the result. Only individual thinking beings can think and take action, and be solely, individually responsible for the result. In democracies, rulers are always fond of proclaiming "the buck stops here". And the Nürnberg trials confirmed this and the fact that those below that level can also be held responsible for criminal, terrorist acts.

Please think, remember that the CIA, the White House, Congress, Washington, Pakistan, Paris, France, England and all those other abstract entities are not the ones who take action and should—must be—responsible for the result of those actions.

Would those in power in a political regime accept that statement that [some company name] was responsible for an action they did not like? No, they would go after the responsible individual. As it should be for politician who have authorised and performed criminal actions.