After Navy Yard, The Fight For Better Security Begins

  • Share
  • Read Later
Jason Reed / Reuters

A Washington, DC Metropolitan police officer and a Naval District Washington policemen stand guard at the main gate of the Washington Navy Yard in Washington, September 17, 2013.

As President Obama, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and numerous legislators call for a comprehensive review of government security clearance contractors in the wake of the Navy Yard shooting, one fight over how to improve the system has already begun.

A DoD Inspector General audit released Tuesday concluded that the Navy should replace the security clearance program, Rapidgate, which the service uses for many of its facilities including the Navy Yard, because the program relies exclusively on “unreliable” public databases. Rapidgate’s maker, Eid Passport, and its backers in the Navy, are pushing back.

Rapidgate did not grant access to the alleged Navy Yard shooter, Aaron Alexis, who killed 12 Monday. But the attack has heightened scrutiny of the security issues the IG raised about the program.

A key question in the debate is how to ensure criminals don’t gain security clearances. The IG found that Rapidgate allowed 52 convicted felons to receive, “routine, unauthorized installation access, placing military personnel, dependents, civilians, and installations at an increased security risk.”

Eid Passport believes the audit’s findings are “concerning,” but disagrees that the security flaws are its fault, arguing that the company provides the best commercial background check possible under the law. “If, as the audit states, our identity management program didn’t identify the 52 felons, that’s concerning and we’re working with the Navy and the Inspector General to refine that,“ says Eid Passport Vice President of Marketing John Nee. “We already identify tens of thousands of individuals with felony criminal convictions already. We feel pretty confident in our system as it is today, but understand that there’s always room for improvement.”

The DoD Inspector General’s office concludes Rapidgate’s problems are too big for that degree of confidence. The audit calls on the Navy to “immediately discontinue the use of Rapidgate” since the information they provide only uses public record databases. The IG recommends replacing Rapidgate with a system that would also include access to FBI’s criminal record histories. The audit points to Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, which, using the FBI index, denied access for felons not identified by Rapidgate. Nee says that the FBI’s index “has its own flaws.”

4 comments
RickInAmarillo
RickInAmarillo

As a veteran and son of a veteran who lived and worked on military bases worldwide for decades, I've always thought base security was too lax.

sacredh
sacredh

The sequester made cuts across the board. Funding was cut. "Do more with less" is a nice slogan, but that's all it is. It forced cuts to virtually all programs and that included security.

manlyman
manlyman

@sacredh Your party controls 2 of the 3 branches of our government. Your boy sucks as prez, your "at least he's not a republican" argument just ain't carrying much weight lately. But you know that sacred. Your blather used to at least be a little humorous, even if it was aimed at conservatives in a attempt to push their buttons, now it's just incoherent chatter. This all belongs to Barry, the blood on the hands, the dismal state of our union, all of it. But keep dutifully circling his wagons. At least he's not a republican, right?

KeillRandor
KeillRandor

@manlyman @sacredh 

As we're finding out - holding both houses of congress is far more powerful than only holding one, regardless of who's in the WH, though if any president can get his ducks lined up in a row, then...  (Which many politicians have made plain they won't let anything like that even remotely happen for this president, or even congress as a whole.)