President Obama’s New Meal Ticket Strategy

Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Senator John McCain flashes a thumbs-up when asked by a reporter about how the Jefferson Hotel dinner went with President Barack Obama and a group of fellow Republican senators on March 6, 2013.

President Obama appeared at a loss one week ago as he stood before his press corps. “What more do you think I should do?” he snapped at a reporter, after being asked if he shared responsibility for the harmful budgetary gridlock in Washington. “I’ve offered negotiations around that kind of balanced approach. And so far, we’ve gotten rebuffed.”

Those were his words. But his actions suggested he already knew there was something else he could do. Within days, he started phoning, meeting and eating with his foes, and things have been looking up ever since. Not since Obama came into office in 2009 has there been so many bipartisan vibes between Republicans and the White House. In a remarkable few days, months of rising bitterness seem to be slipping away. Temperatures have been lowered. Political rhetoric has been replaced by cagey optimism. The infuriating posturing that is the daily bread of so much Washington conversation, not to mention the campaign-style speeches of Obama in the heartland, has been largely put on hold.

House Speaker John Boehner, who has spent years whipping conservatives into outrage at the President’s behavior, has said he is “hopeful.” White House spokesman Jay Carney says the President has called the talks “very constructive and very pleasant.” Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey, a conservative deal maker who spent a good chunk of January publicly questioning the President’s truthfulness, has begun talking like a big deal on fiscal issues of taxation, spending and deficits could happen. “I think there are areas where we could reach common ground, I think that is possible, but it’s not going to happen over one dinner,” he said Wednesday. “This was a beginning of a process and there’s a lot of work left to do.”

In January, the President himself downplayed the usefulness of building personal bonds with his opponents in Congress. “When I’m over here at the congressional picnic and folks are coming up and taking pictures with their family, I promise you, Michelle and I are very nice to them and we have a wonderful time,” Obama said at his first press conference after the election. “But it doesn’t prevent them from going onto the floor of the House and blasting me for being a big-spending socialist.”

But now the President has become social in a big way. He called a raft of Senators for private conversations over the weekend and on Monday, people like Tennessee’s Bob Corker, Oklahoma’s Tom Coburn, and Ohio’s Rob Portman. He dined at the posh Jefferson Hotel on Wednesday night with 12 Republicans senators, who left the event flashing thumbs-up gestures to the gathered press. On Thursday, he had lunch with the House Republican’s budget guru, Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, and his democratic counterpart, Maryland’s Chris Van Hollen. And then there was the meeting that predated the President’s exasperation in the briefing room, with Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham. “It’s one of the best meetings I’ve ever had with the President,” Graham gushed after words, a claim that was confirmed by White House aides.

Next week, he plans to keep up the dining-diplomacy by heading up to Capitol Hill, where he will meet Senate Republicans over lunch, and he has also requested a similar meeting with House Republicans. As a strategy, it is a far cry from Obama’s most recent negotiations with House and Senate leaders, which often in private meetings between himself and John Boehner, or with his staff, Vice President Joe Biden, or Senate Democrats as intermediaries.

Most of those negotiations, in the summer of 2011 and in December of 2012, ended in frustration and failure. This new spate of good vibes may go the same way in the end. Neither side has signaled a change from their negotiating position on the most difficult issues. But the spirit of the city is shifting, and the commonalities between the two parties, for the first time in several years, are taking center stage. This is how Washington once worked. The nation now waits to find out if it can work this way again.

Additional reporting by Alex Altman

36 comments
DANIELP67365960
DANIELP67365960


Nora. I just agree... Robert`s stori is nice... on friday I bought Mercedes-Benz S-class since I been making  8599 this past five weeks and in excess of  10 thousand last munth. without a doubt its my favourite-job Ive ever done. I began this 6 months ago and straight away brought home over  81 per/hr. I use this website,, pie21.om


famulla5
famulla5

President Obama is meeting the press tonight in Washington, D.C. He'll be having dinner tonight at the Gridiron Club, an organization of journalists, at a downtown hotel.

But only one print pool reporter will be allowed to cover the event, which is supposed to be humorous and in good fun. And a camera crew was once again not allowed to cover the event.

Here's the first print pool report of the evening:

The motorcade departed from the South Lawn at 6:51 p.m. and arrived at the Renaissance Washington Hotel four minutes later. There were no sightings of the president, who is speaking at the 128th annual Gridiron Club and Foundation dinner this evening. 

Of note, this is the first time a president’s Gridiron remarks will be pooled. Print pool only and only of the president’s remarks. The WH will also send a transcript tonight. I’m told to expect the president’s remarks to begin in the 10 o’clock hour. ...

Pool will hold at the Renaissance until the president’s remarks begin.

FROM the GRIDIRON CLUB and FOUNDATION:

President Barack Obama, political leaders, media executives and journalists sequestered themselves Saturday for a night of bipartisan satire at the 128th  annual Gridiron Club and Foundation dinner. 

The president headlined the white-tie event at the Renaissance Washington Hotel and was preceded to the Gridiron podium by Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, representing the Democrats, and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, speaking for the Republicans.

Gridiron President Charles J. Lewis of Hearst Newspapers started off the evening of musical skits skewering Washington for its budget impasses, political infighting, gun-rights battles and sex scandals. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA

famulla5
famulla5

Nowhere was the place to be if you wanted to see the signs of end times for the American Empire up close. It was the place to be if you wanted to see the madness -- and oh yes, it was madness -- not filtered through a complacent and sleepy media that made Washington’s war policy seem, if not sensible, at least sane and serious enough. I stood at Ground Zero of what was intended to be the new centerpiece for a Pax Americana in the Greater Middle East.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the invasion of Iraq turned out to be a joke. Not for the Iraqis, of course, and not for American soldiers, and not the ha-ha sort of joke either. And here’s the saddest truth of all: on March 20th as we mark the 10th anniversary of the invasion from hell, we still don’t get it. In case you want to jump to the punch line, though, it’s this: by invading Iraq, the U.S. did more to destabilize the Middle East than we could possibly have imagined at the time. And we -- and so many others -- will pay the price for it for a long, long time.

           The Madness of King George

It’s easy to forget just how normal the madness looked back then. By 2009, when I arrived in Iraq, we were already at the last-gasp moment when it came to salvaging something from what may yet be seen as the single worst foreign policy decision in American history. It was then that, as a State Department officer assigned to lead two provincial reconstruction teams in eastern Iraq, I first walked into the chicken processing plant  in the middle of nowhere.

By then, the U.S. “reconstruction” plan for that country was drowning in rivers of money foolishly spent. As the centerpiece for those American efforts -- at least after Plan A , that our invading troops would be greeted with flowers and sweets as liberators , crashed and burned -- we had managed to reconstruct nothing of significance. First conceived as a Marshall Plan for the New American Century, six long years later it had devolved into farce.

In my act of the play, the U.S. spent some $2.2 million dollars to build a huge facility  in the boondocks. Ignoring the stark reality that Iraqis had raised and sold chickens locally for some 2,000 years, the U.S. decided to finance the construction of a central processing facility, have the Iraqis running the plant purchase local chickens, pluck them and slice them up with complex machinery brought in from Chicago, package the breasts and wings in plastic wrap, and then truck it all to local grocery stores. Perhaps it was the desert heat, but this made sense at the time, and the plan was supported by the Army, the State Department, and the White House.

Elegant in conception, at least to us, it failed to account for a few simple things, like a lack of regular electricity, or logistics systems to bring the chickens to and from the plant, or working capital, or... um... grocery stores. As a result, the gleaming $2.2 million plant processed no chickens. To use a few of the catchwords of that moment, it transformed nothing, empowered no one, stabilized and economically uplifted not a single Iraqi. It just sat there empty, dark, and unused in the middle of the desert. Like the chickens, we were plucked.

In keeping with the madness of the times, however, the simple fact that the plant failed to meet any of its real-world goals did not mean the project wasn't a success. In fact, the factory was a hit with the U.S. media. After all, for every propaganda-driven visit to the plant, my group stocked the place with hastily purchased chickens, geared up the machinery, and put on a dog-and-pony, er, chicken-and-rooster, show. I thank you FirozaliA.Mulla DBA


paulejb
paulejb like.author.displayName 1 Like

Sure hope the boys ate 2% less in honor of the sequester.

reallife
reallife

he's taking the Republicans out to dinner while the poor little children are starving due to the sequester?

where is the liberal compassion?


Curious_Quiche
Curious_Quiche like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

I am always irrationally hopeful that these dinner things will have a Jehu/Priests of Baal dynamic. Always disappointed. However, if the President can pull a bipartisan pearl off of the necklace the Republicans clutch so fiercely, I will progress from disappointment to astonishment without passing GO or collecting 200 dollars.

KountyKobbler
KountyKobbler like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

As they snack together  remeber  their is no free lunch for the kids in school?  while millionaire Elected officials pass the meat and potatoes  in Congresss.

Student
Student

@ipolisci Maybe. Sounds a little like back-door Green Lantern theory.

prowag
prowag

@Student @ipolisci I'm skeptical at prez level. Boehner's "hopeful" quote came right after he mocked Obama for finally meeting with them.

lurch
lurch like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

So, Obama is pretty much holding out the 'olive branch' again like he did when he was first elected, when the Republicans kept slapping it out of his hand. 

Maybe, just maybe, the GOP have read the writing on the wall. People are sick and tired of their hysterics & refusal of any & every proposal the President suggests.

TomR1045
TomR1045

@lurch I'm curious. Were you sick and tired of Obama's actions and flat out lies coming from him as to  what the impact of the sequester would be? Is that really what you expect of the President?

grape_crush
grape_crush like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

> But the spirit of the city is shifting, and the commonalities between the two parties, for the first time in several years, are taking center stage.

It's so nice to see that the political media is getting the displays of bipartisanship it has been asking for. We'll see if this good faith dining extends to good faith policy negotiation.

Not. Holding. Breath.

Paul,nnto
Paul,nnto like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

@grape_crush But blissful bipartisanship is all that matters. 

If it results in contraction causing austerity, well that's boring policy stuff.

Ivy_B
Ivy_B like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Paul,nnto @grape_crush Michael seems to be trying for the David Broder crown now. I thought he was going for the anything Obama does is wrong chair, but he may view the Broder one as better - after all he was always on the teevee blessing centrism and bipartisanship.

LeslieJonesMcCloud
LeslieJonesMcCloud like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

What a disgusting display. Who are these one, two percent-ers? How can they remain so disconnected from what is actually happening to people who are not wealthy? Do they even know what poverty is? Poverty in this country is $40,000 for a family of four. The super-poor make less. Do these people have any idea how much it costs to feed a teen boy? These neo-conservative pols are only spokesmen for the corporate super rich. What the president seeks is fairness. I wonder what was in those plates of food they consumed. Not a skinny man among them - they seem well-fed. Fat hogs. A group of unwise men consider a cut to the nose to spite the face just because it feels like the right thing to do.

BJPropst
BJPropst like.author.displayName 1 Like

McDonald's for dinner? 
















gabrielapetrie
gabrielapetrie

Yeah. And the President's administration has "begun talking" like he doesn't care about the sovereignty of U.S. citizens, at home or abroad. Just a couple of days ago his Attorney General said, in the context of drone strikes against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil, that he can imagine a scenario where U.S. military force is justified on U.S. soil. So we can figure in the part about it being against U.S. citizens, as well, because that's what the conversation was all about. And furthermore, he cited Pearl Harbor and 9/11 as times when it would have been useful to do so.

Writer14
Writer14

"a outrage"

Does no one proofread these articles?

gysgt213
gysgt213 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Isn't this what the media wanted.? Obama and republicans dating.

meddevguy
meddevguy like.author.displayName 1 Like

"balanced approach" -- I need tax increases so I can pander to my base and divide the Republicans.

"meeting and eating with his foes, and things have been looking up ever since" -- Do I look like I am reaching out or what? I'm watching those polls.

"But the spirit of the city is shifting, and the commonalities between the two parties," -- See, it's been their leadership all along. I have always been ready to do my "balanced approach" of taxes in January, then demand more "taxes on the rich" and offer some decrease in my increased spending -- sometime in the future ... if I feel like it.

At least we do have the legacy figured out -- The best Political Campaigner to ever sit in the White House.

fhmadvocat
fhmadvocat like.author.displayName 1 Like

I don't think the President is the only one looking at the polls.  Right now, Congressional Republicans rank just ahead of North Korea and behind root canal surgery in terms of popularity.

PaulDirks
PaulDirks like.author.displayName 1 Like

@meddevguyI need tax increases 

Because tax rates are at historic lows and they are contributing significantly to a deficit that Republicans can't help screaming about even though they're fighting like mad to make sure that it gets worse.

gabrielapetrie
gabrielapetrie like.author.displayName 1 Like

@meddevguy There's little difference between the two parties except rhetoric they just beat each other over the head with every year, for the entertainment of the crowd. The things they both work toward are always their meeting points. Now Obama's Attorney General is talking just like Bush Jr.

PaulDirks
PaulDirks like.author.displayName 1 Like

How else are those 'You mean chained CPI was on the table all along????" moments going to get generated?


Paul,nnto
Paul,nnto like.author.displayName 1 Like

@PaulDirks That the apparent lack of communication between republican leadership and the rank and file didn't warrant a mention in MS's piece is interesting, isn't it?

I may be onto something with my comparison. 

JoeSloan
JoeSloan like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Let's hope "thumbs up" doesn't mean the veal was delicious.  Words are cheap...let's see what transpires before patting anyone on the back.

Paul,nnto
Paul,nnto like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

BHO may have stumbled onto a smart strategy. When he bypasses the media and communicates directly with the population he has more success. And now when he bypasses the republican leadership (leadership in name only in the case of Boehner) in Congress he makes progress. 

Media elites and republican leadership seem to have something in common. 

grape_crush
grape_crush like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Paul,nnto > Media elites and republican leadership seem to have something in common.

That, at best, both show themselves to be generally useless?

At worst, they're a drag on the forward progress of the country.

meddevguy
meddevguy like.author.displayName 1 Like

Our President NEVER bypasses the media. They are an important part of his full-time election campaign team.