Spyfall

David Petraeus’ affair with his biographer ended his 37-year career. But the damage from this episode goes far wider

  • Share
  • Read Later
Karen Bleier / AFP / Getty Images

CIA Director David Petraeus testifies before the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee during a full committee hearing on "World Wide Threats" in Washington, D.C. Jan. 31, 2012

Meanwhile, Kelley’s life and family were singed by the spotlight. Reports cast doubt on the charitable work of the Doctor Kelley Cancer Foundation that Jill and her husband Scott Kelley had established, which spent little of its money on its declared missions “to conduct cancer research and to grant wishes to terminally ill adult cancer patients.” Instead the foundation devoted most of its dollars to meals, entertainment, travel and auto and office expenses. Altogether, Kelley looked as if she were auditioning for the lead in The Real Housewives of Tampa.

The media excavation of the Kelley family fortunes further revealed that Petraeus and Allen took the step, unusual for current and former four-star officers, of intervening in a civilian child-custody case. District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Neal Kravitz found Kelley’s sister Natalie Khawam had misrepresented “virtually everything.” But Petraeus and Allen averred that she was an honorable, loving and reliable mother. Kravitz apparently did not give them much credence. He awarded custody of Khawam’s son to her estranged husband Grayson Wolfe, who once worked for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad.

By that point the public was obsessed with the details of a case whose players themselves seemed obsessed: law-­enforcement officials revealed that the FBI special agent—Frederick Humphries II, according to the New York Times—who took Kelley’s case to the Tampa field office in the first place had a personal ­friendship with her that included his sending a ­shirtless photograph of himself. Law-enforcement sources said he repeatedly intervened to advance the case, to which he was not assigned, and in late October he telephoned two House Republicans, Dave Reichert and Eric Cantor, to report his ­belief—­erroneous, law-­enforcement officials insist—that Obama’s Justice Department was covering up the case for unspecified political reasons. Humphries, according to the Wall Street Journal, is now the subject of an ethics probe by the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility.

(MORE: Beneath Glowing Public Image, Petraeus Had His Critics)

As for Broadwell, she instantly became an object of mass fixation, on everything from her Dickensian name to her fitness  (she out-push-upped Jon Stewart on The Daily Show) to her vast “ambition,” which depending on the headline writer was either an asset or a slur. Everything about the story twisted into knots the standard narratives  about sex and power and values and victims and who exactly gets cast as the protagonist when two married people stray. A homecoming queen from North Dakota whom classmates voted “most likely to be remembered,” Broadwell, like Petraeus, graduated from West Point, with academic, fitness and leadership honors. She earned advanced degrees at Harvard, where she first met Petraeus, and the University of Denver, and she was recalled to active duty three times after 9/11. On Twitter, she describes herself as an author, national-security analyst, Army vet, women’s rights activist, runner, skier, surfer, wife and “Mom!” About three years ago, Broadwell settled in Charlotte, N.C., with her husband Scott, a radiologist in a local medical group, and their two sons. “Yes, I wear a number of hats,” Broadwell told Inspired Woman magazine in February. “But my most important title is mom and wife.”

Discretion or Protection?
Thus far it is undisputed that word of the Petraeus affair first reached the White House on Wednesday, Nov. 7, the day after Obama’s re-election, in a telephone call from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr. to National Security Adviser Tom Donilon. Obama was celebrating with his family and staff in Chicago, and Donilon decided to hold the news until Thursday morning. Hours later, in the Oval Office, Obama told ­Petraeus he was not ready to accept the CIA chief’s resignation. “He wanted to sleep on it,” an Administration official says.

By Friday, there was no saving Petraeus. The Justice Department informed the White House Counsel’s office of the discovery of Allen’s voluminous correspondence with Kelley. Allen’s nomination for the NATO job, with Senate hearings set to begin within days, was put on hold and risked being withdrawn. It was the second time in three days that Obama had been caught unaware by long-simmering investigations within his government. “The President,” said White House spokesman Jay Carney, “was obviously surprised.”

Should Attorney General Holder have informed the President sooner? “I am withholding judgment,” the President told reporters. The unexpected discovery of Petraeus in the Kelley case put the Justice Department in a bind. Nobody wants to return to the days when J. Edgar Hoover used the secrets in his files for political advantage, so deciding what to tell the White House about the private lives of public figures requires great discretion. White House advisers say they are content for the Justice Department to follow its established protocols. But federal officials have offered conflicting and sometimes inaccurate explanations of what the protocols say.

One senior law-enforcement official says a 2007 memo by Bush Attorney General Michael Mukasey set strict limits on White House–Justice communication in criminal investigations. “Alerting the White House of an ongoing investigation? That’s a huge no-no,” the official says.

But the Mukasey memo said something quite different. In criminal cases, it said, Justice should balance the value of secrecy from the “law enforcement perspective” against the information “important for the performance of the President’s duties.” And in national-security cases, the memo specifically stated that no such restriction applied. Mukasey tells TIME that an ongoing extramarital affair by the CIA chief is a potential national-security issue. “They know enough at the point that his name turns up,” Mukasey says. “He’s doing it on a Gmail account, which any intelligence agency in the world would want to know about, and if they did know about, would feel in a position to use.”

MORE: Could Petraeus Face a Court-Martial?

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
547 comments
Merlin1935
Merlin1935

I couldn't care less for the CIA Director's extra-marital affair but for two reasons:

1. Even if he cannot be reached directly for blackmail, the woman he cheated with can certainly be blackmailed and through her, the Director can unwittingly pass secrets to enemies.

2. Given that he decided to have an affair (which by the way is a male characteristic, like it or not), his methods of concealment were too clumsy for a top spy. He violated the most basic rules of a player: do not leave a trail, do not write anything, do not leave messages, do not involve third parties, do not have witnesses.

Beginning with Eve, in all of history women have always been the downfall of great men. This will not be the last. I am Obama fan, but I believe his own sex scandal will one day arrive. It is in the DNA of powerful men. Stay tuned.

ravin5555
ravin5555

sir,who authorized investigation against CIA director? the investigation into threatening e-mails ends with discovery of Broadwell. then who ordered further investigation? second point is when the CIA director has not violated any rule of secrecy or service than why he was forced to resign? the thousands of news stories about them do not enlighten about the preferences of much maligned lovers. the general behaved like Clinton or Kennedy?

DMark
DMark

It was reported that Ms. Broadwell had classified documents on her computer.  That would be a no. no and she should have to suffer the consequences of that!  Also as a reserve Officer, she should know that adultery is against the rules of the Military and she should also suffer the consequences of that.  We shall see if the rules are for everyone or just for the ones who do not have much pull!!!!!

BerreckObeme
BerreckObeme

AlJezra News: The arabian kings have so many wives for a slavery so all the arabian kings must lose their jobs too as the fallen arabian kings.

ironyman2
ironyman2

The problem with David Petraeus was never that he had an affair. Finally, media are coming around to the real issue: his performance as commander of two wars Or is it his non-performance. "A Phony Hero for a Phony War"  by Lucian Truscott IV is running in several major newspapers, as well as The Washington Post's take-down of the perks of generals - what these "heroes" cost the taxpayers.

PapaFoote
PapaFoote

HERE IS A "SENTENCE" THAT I NOTICED":

"..Thus far it is undisputed that word of the Petraeus affair first reached the White House on Wednesday, Nov. 7, the day after Obama’s re-election, in a telephone call from Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Jr. to National Security Adviser Tom Donilon..."Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/15/spyfall/#ixzz2CbyaElv1

WHICH SEEMS TO SHOW THAT "PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS NOT INVOLVED" - I HOPE!

The Old Mountain Goat 

Piacevole
Piacevole

Maybe it would help to consider this man as "General Portrayal."

He was very good at portraying a general officer: lots of medals, great resume, adroit at getting promotions, knew the right people, the right things to say.  But ultimately, this was a facade, and where we needed an actual edifice, we just got an erector set.

LesMoore
LesMoore

She's a 'national security analyst' - really?  How does one go about getting such a title - you just put it on your resume because it sounds good?

Nothing_To_Say
Nothing_To_Say

I really feel sorry for general Petraeus. He seems to be a man of honour and even though what he did is morally reprehensible his actions mab be the result of natural human behavior.

I would certainly put most of the blame of on that Kelley - lady - and the FBI guy who used the information they had on their hands as warfare against U.S. army generals. They went straight for the kill...

I wonder if there's a law to prevent the use of information as warfare against individuals...  

Other than that, excellent article, nice example of good journalistic work...

dayanithi190455
dayanithi190455

I turn to Times whenever you need to understand the background and truthful account of behind the scenes actions like these are revealed. Good job dear Reporters. 

MayraI.Leonard
MayraI.Leonard

This was a very entertaining article! I downloaded the current issue on my Kindle Fire, and I love the graphics on how everyone was entangled in this damn mess!

jhoughton1
jhoughton1

I have one question -- actually, many -- but one I can't get out of my mind: how does a general, running a theater of operations or whatever they call it, have time to engage in 20-30K pages of email?  With anyone?  In a lifetime?  And this guy Allen is supposed to be good at his job??

I think Obama should just rehire Petraeus.  Screw it, he doesn't have to run for re-election so what does it matter what people think?

charley
charley

Why wouldn't Petraeus and Broadwell get divorced first and then carry on with dating?? If there's a lack of integrity in one relationship the same will apply in others. I think the U.S. should definitely worry about security with Petraeus and are lucky to be rid of him. Of course he will  be a consultant now to the government and make even more money. Let's see how true the love is between Petraeus and Broadwell and see if they both divorce and marry. 

akpat
akpat

So how do these generals find time to soldier when in 3 years they can send 30,000 pages of e mails ?

no wonder it takes so long to get anything done.

z1000
z1000

The U.S is spending trillions of dollars waging two wars where the top generals spend their time hiring Broadwells to write books or spending countless hours flirting and writing 1000s of pages to Kelly type socialites. What a waste of tax money.

z1000
z1000

The U.S is spending trillions of dollars waging wars where the 

jalangaya
jalangaya

On the bright side, the Petraeus affair introduced us to vivacious, voluptuous Tampa temptress Jill Kelley, whose astonishing beauty makes it easy to understand why intelligent men at the highest levels of government & society found her enchanting & irresistible.

RonaldOstrowski
RonaldOstrowski

Mace needs remedial math. 20 trillion times 3% is NOT a Trillion dollars. From a CPA.

EvaGonzalez
EvaGonzalez

THE AFFAIR  that will unseat Obama ! 

Nixon succumbed to Watergate, Obama will to Benghazigate --ttps://www.facebook.hcom/photo.php?fbid=374339219308210&set=a.349349441807188.80610.339902456085220&type=1&theater

Obama will be impeached !    

(copied ) 

BRER_OrabbitObama on Impeachment: 'My fellow Amerikans -

 I lie for the demise of all those more fortunate; and I lie for the benefit of all those less fortunate. Therefore, I lie more or less, but the more I lie the less I perceive I'm lying. 

Thus, I lie for all equally; without regard to whether I know I'm lying, but with the crystal clear knowledge that when my lies change in the future my past lies will not catch up with me because by then my new lies will have belied my old lies and my present lies will engulf my past lies so that I can rightfully say today that I am not a liar because I lie for the respectability of all liars inside and outside the beltway, both foreign and domestic and without consideration of nationality, religion, sexual orientation, race, gender, or the sanctity of life.

But even more importantly, I lie for the benefit of all the children of the world who are unable to lie for themselves

ahranjha
ahranjha

A saying, "Behind Every successful Man is a Woman" is in great SUSPICION ! Half Jokingly jokes apart, Apparently the formidable, affluent people are unhappy in their own ways. And I strongly agree with the statement in the Article  "After all, Superman is also a Man!" 

ttaerum
ttaerum

The scandal about Petraeus and Obama's little fit about Rice are about the things of fairy tales - the knight, the dragon and the fair maiden. We have never seen Obama defend anyone else with such breathless conviction. One could feel his passion to calm the fluttering heartbeat of his fair maiden, to strike the sword into the dragon which wondered how it was she was so easily led astray. One knew that any moment he would reach out to her and protect her, their lips might accidently touch - cherry? His knees were feeling weak - kryptonite!!! clearly the dragon knew his weakness. What hope was there against such a villainous foe?But then there was Petraeus and in D.C. there are few friends and even fewer secrets. Hadn't he fought dragons? How often had he heard the rhyme - Obama has killed his thousands but Petraeus his tens of thousands. It was, well, biblical in proportion. How could Petraeus be greater than the President? Hadn't Obama killed the mightiest dragon of them all? It was true he had little to do about it except watch courageously in front of the thin-screen LCD monitor. And why did Petraeus go to Benghazi? Didn't he trust what the boys scouts told him?No doubt, it was time to slay dragons and show the American people just how might and strong he could be protecting his fair maiden.  Ride on mighty knight... ride on...

JohnWerneken
JohnWerneken

And Mr. Obama is not, should not, but being smart AND RE-ELECTED, he may well do something unexpected: something wise about our future. Take that, Mr. Mace and adversaries lol.

JohnWerneken
JohnWerneken

As to Mr Petraeus, though the apparent fact that folks can get excited about the sexual or marital activities of other people, and think all that chit matters, makes it matter politically and maybe even in espionage, the fact that all of you except me vote for some one thing gives that fact no where near as much real importance as the fact that I just don't give a damn about your opinions, on anything, nor your actions either. I think that shows you maximum respect: I recognize your right and tendency to do as you please.

Petraeus was doing a good job imho. So he should still have that job. Screw democracy.

JohnWerneken
JohnWerneken

At last, a reason for Moderators in a chat: Mr. Mace. grrr

ironyman2
ironyman2

@Merlin1935 This little dude did it to himself, woman or not. The Petraeus Tale is one of pure arrogance. Greed, too. He wanted it all. If you blame "the women," you are saying men are too weak to manage or run anything - their own personal lives or, for instance, a country. Wait ... I may agree with you.

Merlin1935
Merlin1935

After reading the entire report I am compelled to feel bad for General Petraeus. I wish him well. 

ironyman2
ironyman2

@AdamsHospLLC  It's not your Hollywood-style Angela-Jennifer-Brad situation. This is real-world serious - the director of the CIA getting caught with his pants down. And worse: not being smart enough to understand email. Petraeus was a senior government official paid by taxpayers for securing our country. His judgment was alarmingly poor. Maybe this will continue to call attention to his real failures: two wars that cost the U.S. in blood and money, not to speak of what it costs the innocent people of the countries he devastated.

ironyman2
ironyman2

@Nothing_To_Say  Petraeus was the senior government official, paid by us - taxpayers - to secure our country. The man showed poor judgment and a stunning lack of honor. There's plenty of blame to go around, but all the crap is rightfully running downhill to Mr. Big Man - Petraeus himself. No one deserves it more.

Basnig
Basnig

@Nothing_To_Say It is not Kelley's fault. To begin with, Broadwell was harassing her. Broadwell has most of the blame here. She already was having an affair with Petraeus. She crossed the line even further when she started sending harassing emails to Kelley and to Allen. Kelley was afraid -- she had no intention of bringing down a general. She was not even aware it was Broadwell was behind all this. Broadwell is arrogant and selfish and she deserves to be dishonorably discharged from the US Army and stripped permanently of her secret clearance.

Rachel421
Rachel421

@jhoughton1 I've been wondering about that as well.  Even if you  count my spam, I doubt I've had 20k-30K e-mails from anyone, ever - including regular clients I've had over the past several years and loved family members.  My day is spent on the computer, doing research and sending e-mails.  I sure as hell haven't sent out that many.

ironyman2
ironyman2

@jhoughton1 

Right. And how else can the President of the Free World humiliate himself? Little Man Petraeus has flawed judgment and character, plus his bloated self-image that took him of the rails. All this began forming when Mrs. Broadwell was a toddler..

outsider
outsider

@jhoughton1  

I think the point about the amount of emails is a very valid point. 

jhoughton1
jhoughton1

@d.grogan317 Oh, please, will you stop??  No amount of right-wing chanting is going to get this non-story, non-event, non-issue off the ground.  Save your breath.

jhoughton1
jhoughton1

@EvaGonzalez Ya know, it was okay to do your "hate" thing on Obama while he was running for office. But now he's our president.  How about showing a little respect?  We need him to do a good job and he'll do a better job with the American people behind him.

Nothing_To_Say
Nothing_To_Say

@Basnig @Nothing_To_Say  

There was not such a thing a harrasement - Kelley told authorities that she didn't feel comfortable with the emails and that she believed it was Broadwell who sent them....funny that she contacted the FBI guy who was sending her shirtless pcitures.....and by the way, I also think it is a extremely extrange coincidence that she is originally from Lebanon....maybe authorities need to keep digging into her life...I'm guessing there is more....

jhoughton1
jhoughton1

@Rachel421 @jhoughton1 In fairness, I believe it says their communication consisted of 20-30K PAGES of emails.  Still, that's pretty impressive for a guy who's being ferried around in private jets because he's so WONDERFUL at being a general in charge of an army.  

JohnWerneken
JohnWerneken

@Mace @JohnWerneken just did. Maybe Big Momma will boot ur dumb ass. btw I agree with your politics, it is you personally that I find useless and offensive. If I were a Nazi, you would be for the ovens.

Basnig
Basnig

@Nothing_To_Say @Basnig I don't know where you are getting your news. Obviously, you are entrenched in your personal attention and do not care about FACTS.

Rachel421
Rachel421

@jhoughton1 That's what I meant to type.  (I'm overly tired and have been working for more 14 hours straight.)  Still, I ghostwrite for a living and even then, it's not 20K or more pages even if I'm sending whole chapters or even eBooks to repeat clients.  ALL of my spam over the course of a year is about 15K pages and it's certainly not from the same spammer.  

How the hell did they have time to do anything else if they're sending so many pages?  Is this all they did?  I' get exhausted just thinking about  it.

BenevolentLawyer
BenevolentLawyer

@Mace With all due respect, you write about the President with such naked hostility that it is impossible to believe you have any strong connection ,to the pain and challenges, of being part of a minority group with a history of undeserved oppression. 

Mace
Mace

@JohnWerneken   Please post again when you have a rational thought. I have seen the death camps, my family did forced labor for the Nazis, etc. You are intentionally disgusting, which still makes you disgusting.

Mace
Mace

@JohnWerneken It is the reference to Nazis and ovens that is offensive. Anyone, regardless of their politics, who has seen any one of the concentration camps would find your small minded moronic posts offensive.