Morning Must Reads: Town Hall

  • Share
  • Read Later
224 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
ahandout
ahandout

More proof of incompetence, negligence, and lies from Obama:

 State Department employee, Charlene Lamb testified that she "could follow what was happening in almost real-time.” 

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion...

ahandout
ahandout

 Not so much.

U.S. ramps up security before 9/11 anniversary

http://english.cntv.cn/2012091...

This says that the White House was in charge, with that guy Barry taking credit.  Wanna take back that whole throw Hillary under the bus story?  The lies are starting to come unraveled.

"The Obama administration has been preparing for the anniversary. The

White House said over the past month, John Brennan, assistant to the

president for homeland security and counterterrorism, has convened

numerous meetings to review security measures in place."

ahandout
ahandout

Maybe Barry should have sent out the memo a bit earlier, but then he really would have to have been serious.   It's like they woke up on September 10 and someone said, "Isn't there like a really important anniversary or something?"...Oh, crap.   Here, go release this, quick:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-...

"The President reiterated that Departments and agencies must do everything possible to protect the American people, both at home and abroad."

ahandout
ahandout

Here is the full press release from September 10, 2012.  Looks like Barry was in charge.  Too bad, that really messes up the whole Hillary was responsible BS.

Earlier today the President heard from key national security principals

on our preparedness and security posture on the eve of the eleventh

anniversary of September 11th. Over the past month, Assistant to the

President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism John Brennan has

convened numerous meetings to review security measures in place. During

the briefing today, the President and the Principals discussed specific

measures we are taking in the Homeland to prevent 9/11 related attacks

as well as the steps taken to protect U.S. persons and facilities

abroad, as well as force protection. The President reiterated that

Departments and agencies must do everything possible to protect the

American people, both at home and abroad.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-...

ahandout
ahandout

Sorry Libs, Barry is stuck with the buck.  OOPS.  This is from September 10, 2012.

 “the President and the Principals discussed specific measures we are taking in the Homeland to prevent 9/11 related attacks as well as the steps taken to protect U.S. persons and facilities abroad, as well as force protection.” (Emphasis mine.)

What day was the Benghazi attack? 9/11. That Barry, always planning ahead.

Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2012...

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"AP sources: State Dept officials deny linking attack to anti-Islam video, raising questions"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

So, from where was Susan Rice getting her line of BS on September 16?

ahandout
ahandout

 She had to have received it from a political hack, like Axelrod.

paulejb
paulejb

ahandout,

Much more politically viable to blame it on some faceless Intel specialist. With just three weeks to go till election day, it's all hands on deck to protect the boss from his failures.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

 "(and he still pretends to be unbiased)."

==================================

Are you nuts? 23,000 posts and not one claiming to be unbiased. You won't find a more biased opponent of Obama's neo-Marxism. Anyone not biased against left wing ideology is seriously deranged.

MrObvious
MrObvious

Just hypocrite. Unbiased is not the point; you simply pivot against anything Obama even if you supported it previously.

Take campaign money and transparency - you're for it before you're against it.

Take Libya, you were for the attack on Libya before you were against it.

That's you - 23k posts of always being against even if you have to throw yourself under the bus. So speaking of seriously deranged.

paulejb
paulejb

MrObvious,

Citizens United forever!

Never understood why Obama was embarking on adventurism in Libya.

I believe that you will find I am very consistent in my contempt for leftist totalitarian tendencies.

MrObvious
MrObvious

You are very 'consistent' in changing your position to be everything against anyone regardless of your previous position.

that's called hypocrisy. Not much to brag about but I guess you find it special.

paulejb
paulejb

charlieromeobravo,

"The sort of subtle irony that you practice is the kind people need to scrape off their shoe when they accidentally step in it."

----------------------------------------

Is this the same CRB that was just whining and moaning about insults? Are you schizophrenic?

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"Sure you were.  It's not like you contradict yourself constantly to suit your ever changing "I hate Obama" arguments."

============================

Another lib that doesn't do irony or subtle.

MrObvious
MrObvious

That's not irony or subtle, it's you being a ideologue hypocrite.

Irony requires being subtle, something you do as well as a monkey with a hammer.

paulejb
paulejb

MrObvious,

So, you are saying that your fellow hive members are just plain stupid?

MrObvious
MrObvious

I'm saying that you're not subtle or very good at irony. When I use words like 'you' I'm taking about you.

paulejb
paulejb

mantisdragon91,

"Just pointing out that you contradict yourself from post to post. But by all means please don't let me bother you with the facts."

==============================

Any relationship between your comments and a fact would be purely coincidental.

MrObvious
MrObvious

Any relationship between your comments and a fact would be purely coincidental.

Now THAT is ironic.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"Again Paul, if you had proof that they didn't report the story at all you would have a point.  Just because they don't beat you over the head with it doesn't mean there's a bias."

===================================

I see that you have adopted your usual stance and refuse to depart from it.

 http://i2.photobucket.com/albu...

charlieromeobravo
charlieromeobravo

Case in point: Don asks for some proof to back up your claim of bias at NYT and you come back with insults rather than attempt to support your position.

paulejb
paulejb

"U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice at center of storm over comments on attack in Benghazi"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

"In an interview Monday with The Washington Post, Rice said she relied on daily updates from intelligence agencies in the days before her television appearances and on a set of talking points prepared for senior members of the administration by intelligence officials. She said there was no attempt to pick and choose among possible explanations for the attack."

Odd. Liberals and left wing drones wouldn't buy this argument on anything that happened in Iraq in the Bush administration.

ahandout
ahandout

 Funny that Rice relied on intelligence updates that never occurred.

The State Department is on the record stating that they never said the attack was due to a protest.  So, was Rice lied to?  Again, who told her to go out and make false statements? 

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

You do realize you just proved all of your talking point from the last few days to be partisan garbage?

paulejb
paulejb

mantisdraogon91,

What are you going on about now, Bugs? 

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

Just pointing out that you contradict yourself from post to post. But by all means please don't let me bother you with the facts.

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

No, he doesn't, and he never will. Notice though how immediately he set upon a new course of argument - double standards (after talking for weeks about how "the buck stops here" with Obama).

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Did that video tell them the whole picture? No. Did it tell them who was attacking and why? No.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

Is it possible that you people are dimmer than I thought? Are you seriously buying this line of BS from Susan Rice? She is claiming that the intel community misled her when they had real time video from the Benghazi attack? 

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

So the buck doesn't stop with Bush?  That is odd, I thought that was a mantra you actually believed in.  Good to see though that you're not refuting her point.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

Perhaps you are to dim to realize that I was mocking the ability of liberals to swallow any BS fed to them by the Obama regime.

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Sure you were.  It's not like you contradict yourself constantly to suit your ever changing "I hate Obama" arguments.

charlieromeobravo
charlieromeobravo

Refuting points isn't what he does here.  Neither does he defend his own points, he just agitates.

charlieromeobravo
charlieromeobravo

@paulejb:disqus "Obviously irony just flies right over your head, CRB. I guess liberals just don't do subtle."

The sort of subtle irony that you practice is the kind people need to scrape off their shoe when they accidentally step in it.

paulejb
paulejb

charlieromeobravo,

Obviously irony just flies right over your head, CRB. I guess liberals just don't do subtle.