Morning Must Reads: Swing

  • Share
  • Read Later

Colorado: Romney 48%, Obama 47% (CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac)
Florida: Obama 47%, Romney 46% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Michigan: Obama 49%, Romney 42% (Detroit News)
Ohio: Obama 51%, Romney 45% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Virginia: Romney 48%, Obama 47% (NBC/WSJ/Marist)
Virginia: Obama 51%, Romney 46% (CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac)
Wisconsin: Obama 50%, Romney 47% (CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac)

245 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Benevolent Lawyer
Benevolent Lawyer

BIDEN WON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  The LYING and evasive RYAN continued to bob and weave and LIE.  Flipping Misogynistic NEOPHYTE!!

This was a great day for all college educated women who wanted assurance that WE ALL need to make sure that Romney will NOT appoint SCOTUS judges. We saw Ryan talk about OUR reproductive rights and what what they will "permit" us do or not do. Jerks!!!

Just like in MA, Romney will lose!! We refuse to be dragged back to the 19th century. We fought for our rights, and Romney and Ryan can take their legitimate RAPE definitions and eat it.  

Hip Hip Hip HURRAAAYYYY!! Go Biden!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Vote Obama/Biden 2012

ahandout
ahandout

 You don't get extra points for !!!!!!!! and caps.  CNN poll has Ryan the winner 48-44.

paulejb
paulejb

mantisdragon91,

 "Also unmoved by common sense, reality or human decency."

==================================

I am particularly unmoved by adolescents who name themselves for a bug,

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 Let me know when you find an adolescent and I'll get him to move you.

MrObvious
MrObvious

But adolescent behavior such as calling other people names based on their ID is the height of maturity.

As always, your commentary is the projection of your daily presence.

Benevolent_Lawyer
Benevolent_Lawyer

 In some ways, tonight's debate is at least

as important as the debates between the presidential candidates. For

the first time in history, a catholic christer is debating a catholic

christer....on some very touchy christer issues. This is not a small

thing, considering the enormous number of catholic christers in the

country. If they play their cards right, this could be a VERY

interesting evening.

ahandout
ahandout

 Why did Barry lie?  Because that's what he does.

Why The Obama Administration Lied About Benghazi

A. A terrorist attack on US soil that resulted in the death of four

Americans including an ambassador does not substantiate the

administration's assertion that President Obama's foreign policy has

been a success. The fact that four years of apologies and appeasements

did not result in the new era of mutual respect Mr. Obama promised; but

rather in more hate and terror will not assist the president in winning a

second term.

B. The administration wanted to cover-up the fact that it denied

and/or ignored requests for additional security in Libya. In the weeks

after the Benghazi attack, multiple requests from US officials in Libya

have been uncovered which show concern over the lack of security there.

Ambassador Stevens himself repeatedly asked the Obama administration for

more security in Benghazi but his requests were denied. US Security

Officer Eric Nordstrom asked his State Department superiors for more

security agents months before the Benghazi attack but got no response.

C. Blaming the ridiculous YouTube video for the attack in

Benghazi gave the president another opportunity to apologize for

American values rather than defend them. The day after the murders, Mr.

Obama condemned the violence but also condemned criticism of Islam. This

attempt to morally equate murder with the exercise of free speech was

such an obvious political disaster that the president had to quickly

release a statement asserting that the First Amendment "is one of the

hallmarks of our Constitution that I'm sworn to uphold, and so we are

always going to uphold the rights for individuals to speak their mind."

D. They thought they could get away with it. With the mainstream

media tucked comfortably in Mr. Obama's pocket for years, there was

good reason for the administration to believe that if they repeatedly

lied about what happened in Benghazi, the lie would be reported as the

undisputed truth. In the most blatant case, US Ambassador to the United

Nations Susan Rice appeared on numerous television programs stating the

attack was "a spontaneous - not a premeditated - response to what had

transpired in Cairo" and that what transpired in Cairo "was a violent

protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video."

The dutiful media aired what we now know to be brazen lies without

challenge.

As the State Department begins to reveal the truth and the

Congressional investigation moves forward, it looks like the answer is

most likely

E. All of the above.

MrObvious
MrObvious

So who is the copy and paste from?

Benevolent_Lawyer
Benevolent_Lawyer

I think I read this on the Vatican blog.

It appears that when ahandjob was still in utero, his mother was frightened by an original thought.

MrObvious
MrObvious

besch, thanks for your input but please get help.

ahandout
ahandout

But the Daily Beast’s Eli Lake

on Wednesday reported that intelligence officials said “the early

information was enough to show that the attack was planned and the work

of al Qaeda affiliates operating in Eastern Libya.” “There was very good

information on this in the first 24 hours,” one of the officials told

Lake. “These guys have a return address. There are camps of people and a

wide variety of things we could do.”

So, much for the liberal lie that the narrative changed as new info came out.  Intelligence knew it was Al Qaeda immediately, and Barry and his goons lied about it for two weeks.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/po...

paulejb
paulejb

La_Randy,

"As new information came to light the narrative changed to reflect it. That is not lying, it is being transparent with the updated intelligence."

============================

It sure seems like the Obama regime went off half-cocked. A definite case of shooting first and aiming later. Is it amateur hour at the White House?

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 Shooting first and aiming later... sound like a quail hunt with Cheney.

ahandout
ahandout

 Paul, the Obama administration saw the attack on 9/11 as something that would damage Barry's re-election, so those four Americans became bumps in the road, and a youtube video took the heat for Barry.

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 Got any proof on that are is this wishful thinking on your part?

Benevolent_Lawyer
Benevolent_Lawyer

 I follow you on the "wishful" part.  "Thinking" -- not so much.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"You are an expert in BS, aren't you?"

===========================

I have a very sensitive BS detector. I can spot liberal BS from a mile away.

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 Too bad you can't spot your own.

paulejb
paulejb

mantisdragon91,

I could spot yours from the moon, Bugs.

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

The moon?! No wonder you have no clue about the reality here on earth.

MrObvious
MrObvious

I have a very sensitive BS detector

The problem is that you put your very sensitive detector in your arse, that would explain why most of your fallacies are projections of your own hypocritical and core less behavior here.

The sensitivity probably comes from the fact that it's a very large detector.

paulejb
paulejb

MrObvious,

I am unmoved by personal attacks, ad hominems and gratuitous insults, Ob. They always indicate that I have won the debate hands down. But thanks for playing.

MrObvious
MrObvious

I am unmoved by personal attacks, ad hominems and gratuitous insults, Ob. They always indicate that I have won the debate hands down. But thanks for playing.

So you've claimed in the past, if it wasn't for your personal attacks, ad hominems and gratuitous insults.

Taking anything you say seriously would probably be the result of someone elses broken BS meter.

I hope you didn't throw out your rant with a straight face because I can't for a minute believe you're starting to believe your own BS at this time.

Who knew that Rod kissing your arse would make you fall for yourself as well.

BTW, just for laughs, what was the actual personal attack, ad hominem and gratuitous insult on my part? Where I told you that you didn't have a core? Or that you're a hypocrite.

Those are facts.

So thanks for tryin' eventhough it's not your thing.

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 Also unmoved by common sense, reality or human decency.

paulejb
paulejb

"DNC fires Obama campaign staffer for assisting voter fraud attempt"

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10...

Lesson for Obama supporters: DON'T GET CAUGHT!

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 And yet Strategic Alliance  Consulting is still getting paid by Republicans. And there is your difference folks

paulejb
paulejb

mantisdragon91,

Oh? Who told you that? Harry Reid's source on Romney's taxes?

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

Poor troll out of touch with reality yet again,

Problematic voter forms have now been found in 10 Florida counties, reported

the New York Times Sunday. The forms are linked to Strategic Alliance

Consulting, a group that was hired by the state Republican Party to sign

up new voters, but was fired last week as reports of suspicious forms

first surfaced in numerous Florida counties.

The Times reports:

The

Florida Division of Elections has forwarded the reports of possible

fraud to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement for investigation.

Prosecutors in some affected counties are also investigating. It is

unclear how many forms have been forwarded, in all: in Palm Beach

County, the election supervisor found 106 suspicious forms, but the

number in several other counties is far lower…

… Election supervisors said they have come across forms with

handwriting that did not match previous registration forms, bogus

addresses and other identifiers like driver’s license numbers that

appeared to be invalid. But in other cases, the forms were just

incomplete, which does not constitute fraud.

Strategic

Alliance is owned by Nathan Sproul, a former executive director of the

Arizona Republican Party. Sproul’s 2004 voter registration project was

investigated by the Justice Department and the attorneys general in

Arizona, Nevada and Oregon as claims of fraud emerged, but no charges

were brought. As Brad Friedman noted

on his Brad Blog last week, despite Sproul’s checkered past, Mitt

Romney’s campaign hired him as a political consultant late last year.

Friedman

also noted that the voter form scandal, along with the recent

revelation of a video showing a GOP voter registration worker screening

out Democrats, is far worse than the claims made against ACORN over

fraudulent voter registration in the past. Even before the latest news

of suspicious voter forms, Friedman noted:

 http://www.salon.com/2012/09/3...

ahandout
ahandout

I'm sure Barry will find her a job in Chicago.

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

DNC does the right thing: Paul gets angry bold.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

Just yesterday the DNC line was that the video was edited. Today the gal's gone. New information, Don?

ahandout
ahandout

Susan Rice, when you are finished celebrating LGBTs, do you think it would be too much to ask if you could tell the f ing truth about Benghazi?

 http://twitchy.com/2012/10/11/...

Priorities.

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Which upsets you more, the fact that she's not talking about Benghazi 24/7 or that she's supporting LGBTs?

ahandout
ahandout

 The lies that Obama and his team of fools spread is what is upsetting.  You do realize that they gave cover to, and spread violent anti-American protests.

MrObvious
MrObvious

You do realize that they gave cover to, and spread violent anti-American protests.

You do realize that this is a bunch of stuff?

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

That she lied to family members of the victims.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"Hyperbole. This is why I don't take you seriously Paul."

=====================================

Horrors! The people who follow me around like groupies don't take me seriously. Why is that as credible as an Obama promise?

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Who says I'm following you anywhere? I post on Swampland, you post on Swampland. There is no following Paul, tone down your ego.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

Sure, Don. If you want to go with that, be my guest.

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Paul, I'm not following you anywhere.  I hate to break this to you but this isn't your personal blog - get over yourself.

MrObvious
MrObvious

So when you reply to others then you're following others around?

You know how a comment section of a blog works right? There's this reply button - someone comments, others reply. And since ahandout likes to respond to you and you to him it's my guess that you're stalking each others.

Again with your pathetic fallacies.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

"Was it available within 24 hours Paul?"

===========================

 

"They DID know: Now White House admits they knew 'within 24 hours' that Al Qaeda was behind Libya attacks despite confusing public statements"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

So, why the two weeks of blatant lies?

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

I recall having this exact same conversation with you some time ago. They labeled it a terrorist attack to free up resources to pursue it and then held off on announcing it until it was confirmed. Not that you care either way.

ahandout
ahandout

 They sure knew that four Americans were killed, yet Barry went on 60 minutes and referred to them as "bumps in the road."  Then he continued campaigning.

ahandout
ahandout

Another loony liberal out of touch, out of her mind, defends Barry.  This time it's the DNC chair.  Obama fears the truth; he is desperate to hide it.

How un-American is it to leave our diplomats defenseless even after they beg for more security?  How un-American is it to blame it on a stupid youtube video, spreading more violence throughout Muslim countries?  Barry built that.

http://weaselzippers.us/2012/1...

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 weaselzippers? Honestly where do you trolls find these sites?

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 How un american is it to cut funding and then shout about for political points?

DonQuixotic
DonQuixotic

Not quite as un-American as parading about a dead ambassador in a desperate bid to win political points in an election year.

ahandout
ahandout

 Why don't you watch that "horrible video" DQ?  It's a freakin' joke, just like Barry blaming an Al Qaeda attack on a youtube video. 

It's not anywhere nearly as horrible as a Quentin Tarantino liberal, garbage film.

But Barry's out for justice.  He's arrested the film maker.

paulejb
paulejb

DonQuixotic,

It's always the cover up which is worse, Don. These political hacks in the Obama regime have learned nothing since Watergate.

mantisdragon91
mantisdragon91

 And they had so many good lessons on coverups from the Bush administration.