The Federal Reserve’s Rule-Making Secrecy

The Wall Street Journal has a thoroughly reported story today on the rise in regulatory secrecy at the Federal Reserve. On 45 of 47 of the draft or final regulatory measures voted on by members since the passage of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill in July 2010, the Fed’s five voting members have e-mailed their votes in, rather than holding the votes in public meetings. The lack of public meetings is a change from the past: In the 1980s and 1990s public voting on regulatory issues were more frequent.

The Fed has been making an effort to appear more open in other decision making areas recently, holding regular press conferences and increasing the information it releases about its monetary policy decisions.

But this new show of transparency hasn’t extended to regulation. The Fed is currently working on 250 rule-writing projects, the Journal reports. Daniel Tarullo, a Fed governor appointed by President Barack Obama and in charge of the rule-writing effort, told the Journal open meetings aren’t always good. “You can have a scripted meeting that does not show any engagement at all,” he said.

MORE: The Street Fighter

Related Topics: federal reserve, Federal Reserve
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus