Newt’s Closing Argument: Just Glad to Be on the Team

Michael Scherer directs me to this new ad from Newt Gingrich, an upbeat composite of debate talking points on the economy. It’s reportedly a “major buy” scheduled to run through next week in Iowa–his closing argument. It’s also a very odd choice for this moment in the race.

The ad, entitled “Winning the Argument,” basically has a general election thrust. Obama sucks. The economy sucks too. Small government will fix it. But there’s already a candidate winning with that particular argument, and he’s the one standing between Gingrich and the nomination. Mitt Romney gets a lot of screen time here and not the bad kind, he’s just smiling or nodding in the background.  Newt ends up looking like he’s just glad to be on the team, as much surrogate as candidate.

That might be in keeping with the encomiums Gingrich has bestowed on positive campaigning this year, but it’s not in keeping with the sharper tone his team has pledged to take in recent days. Nor is it any way to win the nomination.

Related Topics: mitt romney, newt ginrich, Ads
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus