In the Arena

20 Days Till Iowa: The Paul Boomlet

This is one of those days when you can feel the zeitgeist twitch–is it possible that Republicans are already cooling on Newt Gingrich? Well, yes. Newt is the ultimate political impulse buy. He’s terrific at the periphery of the Republican debate, but when he starts moving toward the middle of the stage, and getting more time, and saying more things…people begin to think: Ahhh, Newt? That smartypants? Oh, now I remember why I don’t like him!

And so we have the first, faintest twinkling of poll-fizzle–an Iowa outlier, the PPP poll, had Newt up by only 1 measly point over Ron Paul yesterday. Today, the Bachmann and Perry campaigns are leaking internal polling that has Newt stalled (if you can believe those campaigns)…and the meaningless national tracking polls have Newt stuck around 33% or so. Nothing you can really grab onto, just a feeling, a twinge, made more plausible by two other factors:

1. The anti-Newt attacks by Romney, Paul and Perry have been quite good. Granted, Gingrich is a fat target–but Romney is right to play the “zany professor” card and Freddie Mac cards. “Moon colonies” seemed a lesser line of attack during Saturday’s debate, but the more I think about it, the more it lingers and makes Gingrich seem extravagantly….weird, in a very non-Iowa way. And the fact that Gingrich took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac is a giant, sucking wound, which Romney is picking at successfully on a daily basis. (Today, the Romney campaign unearthed a clip of Gingrich saying–in his flippant, sneery way–that those who profited from Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac should pay off the mortgage lenders’ debts.)

2. The Uncomplicated Crankitude of Ron Paul. He is what he is. He neither flips nor flops. Some of his positions are incomprehensible, others are anathema to Republicans–although his peaceable foreign policy does have some resonance in Iowa, where the locals were traditionally more interested in selling corn to the commies than in nuking them. Both Romney and Gingrich are just too hard to assimilate–all those mind-bending rationalizations for mind-changes on stuff that most conservatives don’t have to think twice about, plus Romney’s Mormonism and Gingrich’s Mammonism. Paul is the ultimate feel-good parking place, an honest man and, today, the winner of the coveted Andrew Sullivan endorsement.

All these doubts add up to unease about Gingrich, and a slight Paul boomlet, which may or may not turn out to be significant. I suspect that the next zeitgeist wrinkle will be a renewed Rick Perry, still dumb but finally accessible, as he begins a 10-day Iowa road trip today in Council Bluffs.

Related Topics: 2012 Election, In the Arena
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus