Gingrich and Paul: A History of Bad Blood

This is Texas Rep. Ron Paul’s third presidential bid, but never before has he gone negative the way he has in recent weeks on former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Paul is spending $429,000 on television ads — a whopping amount, more than almost any other candidate — and much of that is in this 60-second buy in Iowa. The ad is brutal, highlighting Gingrich’s flip-flops and payments from Freddice Mac. When asked about it last week in New Hampshire, Paul said, “It’s nothing personal.” But, as for other politicians who’ve served under Gingrich’s leadership, it kind of is.

Paul has served three separate stints in Congress. One term from 1976 to 1977, followed by a second tour from 1979 to 1985. Then Paul was out of Congress for more than a decade. When he ran again in 1996, it was against party switcher Greg Laughlin. In the primary, Gingrich, then Speaker, and the National Republican Campaign Committee backed Laughlin, who lost in a landslide to Paul. As it is now, Paul’s campaign was fueled by a lot of national libertarian money.

The 1997-98 session marked the attempted coup against Gingrich, whose overreach would lead the party to lose five seats in 1998. That combined with his ethics woes, would force Gingrich from the House in 1999, complaining on his way out about “conservative whiners,” saying he wouldn’t lead a bunch of “cannibals” (ironically a usage coined by Jim Wright, the speaker Gingrich drummed out of office in 1990). One of those maverick, bomb-throwing conservatives? Ron Paul. So, is it any wonder why Paul is on a rampage to prove Gingrich’s “serial hypocrisy”?

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: 2012, ads, Congress, gop, iowa, newt gingrich, ron paul, 2012 Election
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus