MarkBenjamin

Cain Accuser’s Former Boyfriend Corroborates Her Account

The former boyfriend of Sharon Bialek, the woman who has accused Herman Cain of groping her back in 1997, backed up some of Bialek’s story on Monday. The press conference by Shreveport, La., pediatrician Dr. Victor Zuckerman won’t sink Cain’s presidential aspirations, but it does add some credibility to Bialek’s assertions. 

Zuckerman said Monday that both he and Bialek met Cain at a National Restaurant Association event in Chicago in the late 1990s. “Mr. Cain engaged both of us in conversation,” he said, echoing Bialek’s chronology. Zuckerman said he later encouraged Bialek to ask Cain for help looking for a job, as she has said.

Zuckerman also alleged that Bialek had complained to him back in 1997 that Cain responded to her request for help with an unwanted sexual advance. ”When she returned, she was upset. She said that something had happened and that Mr. Cain had touched her in an inappropriate manner,” Zuckerman recalled.

The new information is not a game changer. But it makes Cain’s claim that the “Democrat machine” is behind the allegations look all the more absurd. Either conspiring opponents convinced Zuckerman–who described himself as a registered Republican–to participate in an elaborate plot by several women to falsely accuse Cain of sexual harassment, or the simplest explanation may be the correct one.

Related Topics: herman cain, sexual harrassment, Sharon Bialek, Controversies
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus