Dept. of Verbiage and Lame Apologies

Texas state Representative Larry Taylor had the following to say about making timely claims payments to the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association at a Thursday hearing in Austin: “Don’t nitpick, don’t try to Jew them down.” He then added, “That’s probably a bad term.” No, that’s definitely a bad term.

His subsequent apology was even lamer. “At a legislative oversight committee hearing today, I inadvertently used a phrase that many people find offensive,” read the statement released by his office. “I corrected myself immediately when I realized what I had said. I regret my poor choice of words and sincerely apologize for any harm they may have caused.”

Where to begin. He didn’t say anything “inadvertently.” It’s not like it was a mispronunciation of “bargain.” He might not have realized members of the press were listening, but it’s not like he has Tourette’s. It doesn’t really matter if “many people” find the term offensive, it matters whether or not he subscribes to the anti-semitic stereotype that’s at the root of this usage. I don’t even know what “I corrected myself immediately” means, but as for his actual apology, most of the harm his words caused were to his own image and I don’t doubt he does regrets that.

Antisemitism is still a part of American life, especially in the south. That’s the problem. Not that politicians sometimes forget that they shouldn’t express it while conducting public business.

Related Topics: Miscellany
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus