Senator Scott Brown (R-Jerksville)

Let’s stipulate that Elizabeth Warren should not have responded when debate moderators asked her to comment on Scott Brown’s decision to pose in Cosmopolitan magazine years ago to pay for college. In fact, let’s stipulate that no candidate should ever comment on another candidate’s physical appearance, clothed or unclothed, or say anything that causes voters to visualize any candidate’s body. Please.

There was nothing to be gained by Warren’s dig that “I kept my clothes on” during college. Nothing. But even so…ARE YOU KIDDING ME, SCOTT BROWN? On a Boston radio show this morning, the junior senator from Massachusetts was asked if he had an official response to “Warren’s comment about how she didn’t take her clothes off.” As it happens, Brown did: “Thank God.”

That’s the sort of comeback you make to your sister at the Thanksgiving table, and even then you’d get slugged for it. It’s the kind of snarky insult that would be at home in a comments section. Politicians do know that when they’re on the radio, other people can hear them, right? Last week, Michele Bachmann thanked a radio caller for saying that he’d vote for serial killer Charles Manson over Obama. And now Brown makes this crack?

Apparently, the idea that politics is an extension of junior high has not faded along with Sarah Palin’s political relevancy. Nor has the double-standard for female candidates when it comes to appearance. Wear the same pantsuit too many times or have a bad hair day, and all the talk is about how you look. Invest in a make-up artist and a spiffed-up wardrobe to avoid those issues, and you get dinged for caring too much about how you look.

I hope Scott Brown is already regretting his mean girl snark this morning. But if not, he might want to look back at how female voters responded when Rick Lazio bullied his way into Hillary Clinton’s personal space in a 2000 Senate debate or when Barack Obama told her she was “likeable enough” during the 2008 primaries. Or he could watch any teen comedy made in the last three decades. Everyone knows that the popular jerk who ridicules the ordinary girl may get laughs from his buddies, but by the end of the movie he’s the loser, usually headfirst in a snowdrift or mud-spattered and sputtering.

Related Topics: elizabeth warren, scott brown, 2012 Election
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus