What Jed Bartlet Would Have Thought of Barack Obama

Barack Obama is still all about message discipline these days. What was once “Win The Future” is now “Pass The Bill.” And when it comes to deficit reduction, the catch phrase is “Fair Share,” to be repeated at rallies, in formal addresses and in background comments from senior aides. Ain’t nothin’ new, of course, about “Fair Share,” a phrase that harkens back to old union organizing pitches. Bill Clinton used the phrase back in 1992, in one of his campaign brochures.

But there was a time, about a decade ago, when “Fair Share” fell out of the liberal-centrist canon. How do I know? Just watch this bit of footage from an episode of the West Wing, which first aired May 2, 2001, where Rob Lowe delivers lines written by Aaron Sorkin, rebuking the progressive radicals in his party. Ah, those were the days.

Another funny thing about this: Lowe’s character says “The top 1% of this country pay for 22% of this country.” How quaint. Income inequality is such that the top 1% today is far richer, relative to everyone else, than they were in 2001, which means they pay a greater share of the total income tax pie, even though their tax rates are lower. The current richest 1% now pay much more as a share of the total federal income tax pool–40% in 2007, for instance.

Another thing: Though Sorkin, an outspoken liberal, wrote the script to describe the position of his liberal fictional President, the storyline for this episode was written by Pat Caddell, the old Democratic consultant, who has since become a former Democratic consultant best known for criticizing Democrats on Fox News.

Related Topics: aaron sorkin, Bill Clinton, pat caddell, west wing, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus