Perry Concedes Immigration Hawks Are Capable of Empathy

In an interview with conservative outlet Newsmax, Perry walked back his remark that critics of instate college tuition for illegal immigrants in Texas didn’t “have a heart,” calling it “over-passionate” and “inappropriate.” The comment had really rankled quite a few conservatives, who, even if some of them were willing to give him a pass on the policy, weren’t thrilled about being called emotionless monsters on a Republican debate stage.

Perry hasn’t changed his mind on the merits of the program — he’s still using a states’ rights defense, which you can hear at around the six-minute mark in the video above — but he seems more willing to concede points to conservative critics than his chief rival and fellow heretic Mitt Romney. Again, Perry hasn’t actually backed off much on the substance of his primary heresies — the immigrant tuition issue and his decision to mandate the HPV vaccine for teenage girls — but he’s now toned down the rhetoric on the former and ceded that an executive order was the wrong way to go about the latter. Romney, meanwhile, has had little ground to give on the main blasphemous mark on his record, the health reform plan he enacted in in Massachusetts that served as a model for Obama’s national overhaul, or his rigorous defense of its merits. Of course, he did write a book called No Apology….

Related Topics: Republican Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus