Perry Embraces Israel, Bashes Obama on the Middle East

Rick Perry’s foreign policy remains, in important ways, a work in progress, and a source of some anxiety for Republican foreign policy neocons. But speaking in New York on Tuesday morning, Perry made two things crystal clear: his more-or-less unconditional support for Israel, and his opposition to the Obama administration’s controversial efforts to pressure Bibi Netanyahu over settlement activity. Calling for an immediate return to direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, he also reiterated his strong opposition to the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations. Perry warned that U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority should be “reconsidered” if P.A. leader Mahmoud Abbas doesn’t abandon that effort.

Perry also blasted Obama for an overall “Middle East policy of appeasement,” characterized by what Perry calls time-wasting efforts to negotiate with Tehran and Damascus. “We have been complacent in encouraging revolt against hostile governments in Iran and Syria and we have been slow to recognize the risks posed by the new regime in Egypt and the increasingly strained relationship between Israel and Turkey,” Perry said. On Iran, Perry offered that standard line that “all options must remain on the table” to prevent Tehran from developing military nuclear capability. (Perry has demonstrated some prior interest in Iran: namely his efforts to force Texas to divest its holdings from the country, which he has said “has a clear terrorist focus.”)

None of this should surprise anyone who follows Republican policy on Israel, as Perry’s positions sync with most every other Republican presidential candidate and congressional leaders. It remains to be seen whether Perry will make the de rigeur pilgrimage to visit Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

P.S. It’s worth noting that, unlike the last big national security speech by a GOP candidate–the somewhat more combative remarks of the since-departed Tim Pawlenty, Perry didn’t make fun of the famous “lead from behind” descriptor of Obama’s foreign policy. It would seem that the fall of Tripoli has retired that one, at least for now.

Related Topics: Rick Perry
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus