The Grand Legal Mortgage Morass

If there’s one takeaway from the news that the Federal Housing Finance Agency will sue a dozen big banks for peddling disastrously overvalued mortgage-backed securities in the the run-up to the financial crisis, it’s that the handful of major suits brought against Wall Street since 2008 have never been further from resolution.

The FHFA, which oversees federally-backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is essentially seeking to recoup billions in losses absorbed by the now government sponsored entities when the housing market went bust, arguing that investment banks knowingly misled Fan and Fred when they sold them gilded packages of bad loans. In many ways mortgage securitization is the scandal at the root of the financial crisis — and the area in which crusaders like New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman hope to bring future complaints — but there are other considerations. The housing market is still in terrible shape, the Obama administration’s efforts to stanch the bleeding have largely failed, and 50 state attorneys general are in the middle of negotiating a potentially massive settlement with the banks over rampant foreclosure fraud. These pieces don’t move independently of one another.

In order to get banks to provide mortgage relief, state negotiators may offer them immunity from future prosecution as part of the foreclosure fraud settlement. Exactly what that immunity would cover isn’t clear: The Obama administration argues it wouldn’t preclude securitization suits, but Schneiderman broke publicly with other negotiators over just this issue last week. Either way, the announcement of a new major suit over securitization will undoubtedly muddle the foreclosure settlement talks, and, likely to the chagrin of some at Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, make them more difficult to resolve anytime soon.

The FHFA’s new challenge is hardly a slam dunk either. It filed a similar suit against UBS in July and, according to the Times, those negotiations “have yielded little progress.” In reality, the agency’s latest move may be one of sheer necessity. It’s been almost three years since the government put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship and the statute of limitations expires next week.

Related Topics: Housing
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

blog comments powered by Disqus