Morning Must Reads: Survey

  • The scope of Obama’s upcoming stimulus proposal remains unclear.
  • Alan Krueger, the new White House Council of Economic Advisers chair, may be better equipped to offer small bore creativity than a grand design to increase demand.
  • A quick survey of Krueger’s academic work.
  • The White House distributes talking points for 9/11′s 10th anniversary.
  • Peter Kaplan’s New York essay is not a bad place to start the decennial retrospective.
  • Rick Perry is out front in another national poll.
  • He’s returned to calling Social Security a “Ponzi scheme” and recommending his book on the trail.
  • Not a conversation Mitt Romney should be having:

It’s not accurate, Romney said, simply. The application he made, two years ago, was to double the living space by turning one story into two. The “quadrupling’’ was a measurement of added nonliving space, including a basement and garage.

  • Matt Ygelsias imagines Gore’s presidency.
  • With some time out of the public eye, health reform becomes less polarizing, but not any more popular.
  • Kentucky’s Democratic governor brags, “we reduced the number of state workers to the smallest level in almost 40 years.”
  • And Bachmann’s name fools Jewish donors. (C’mon, double n?)
Related Topics: Must Reads
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney

    On Education, Romney Seeks Distance from Obama–and Bush

    In a speech at the Latino Coalition’s Annual Economic Summit in Washington DC on Wednesday, Mitt Romney called the U.S. education system a failure. Every child deserves a quality education, he said, particularly minority students who are consistently under-served. Fixing it, according to Romney, is the “civil rights issue of our era.”

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

blog comments powered by Disqus