In the Arena

We Have Big Noses, Too

I interrupt my personal boycott of the artist formerly known as Glenn Beck because…I just can’t resist this. Here is what Beck said about his recent sojourns in the Holy Land:

 ”I love the Israelis, he said. “I love the Jewish people. But they drive me out of my mind when they talk over each other. They’re constantly talking!”

Beck compared being around Jews in Israel to a family that had eight children. “Eating dinner at their house was like having dinner in Israel,” he said. “Everybody is just talking at the same time, you can’t even think!”

Perhaps those Jews foolish enough to speak to Beck should speak more slowly, and use simpler words, and even simpler ideas, so that he can understand them. I’d also encourage them to ask Beck the following question: “Do you believe–as the more militant members of Hizballah do–that the existence of the state of Israel presages a cataclysmic battle on the plain of Meggido [Armageddon]…and that after that battle Jesus [or, perhaps, the Mahdi] will return and the Rapture will ensue, featuring the incineration of all those who don’t believe in the appointed messiah?” Ask it slowly. Demand a yes or no answer. Then offer to provide Beck with a nice taxi to Ben Gurion airport.

Related Topics: Viewpoint
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney

    On Education, Romney Seeks Distance from Obama–and Bush

    In a speech at the Latino Coalition’s Annual Economic Summit in Washington DC on Wednesday, Mitt Romney called the U.S. education system a failure. Every child deserves a quality education, he said, particularly minority students who are consistently under-served. Fixing it, according to Romney, is the “civil rights issue of our era.”

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

blog comments powered by Disqus