Dave Camp Cashes in on Super Committee Assignment

Tax reform, you will soon hear, can be good for everybody. But few will benefit more than those who write the legislation. On the same day that House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., got picked to join the 12-member Congressional super-committee that is charged with deciding the country’s spending and taxation fate, his political action committee sent out this invite:

Just think, for $2,500, you too can have “fun” as Camp’s PAC refills your wine glass over chats about mortgage interest deductions, profit repatriation and S-Corporation pass through rates.

We need no longer guess whether Pfizer will have a chance to play a role in the upcoming negotiations, thanks to the Pfizer PAC host duties.

As for the other members of the host committee: Susan Hirschmann is a lobbyist for Williams and Jensen, whose clients also include Pfizer, along with just about everyone else: PhRma, Visa, Brooks Brothers, American Bankers Association, Sunoco, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, AARP, General Electric, etc. She is a former chief of staff to former House Majority Whip Tom DeLay. Sam Lancaster, a former aide to Speaker Denny Hastert, now works for Comcast. Royal Roth works for UPS. Jim Rowland lobbies, appropriately enough, for the Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of America. Sally Vastola is the former chief of staff for former Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y. She now lobbies at Nixon Peabody, where Reynolds works as a “senior strategic policy advisor.” Consider this blog post an advertisement for their services.

And let us all raise a toast to Italy, a wonderful country, where politics, if you can believe it, is in an even more tawdry state of affairs.

Related Topics: dave camp, supercommittee, Taxes, ways and means, Lobbying
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus