Eric Cantor and Barack Obama Finally Agree On Something

Here is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) in an interview today with the Wall Street Journal:

People are tired of the pain. They want to be given some hope. I think that sensible prudent fiscal management will be a foundation for that. We need to lay out a vision for how America can lead again, for how our young people, our students coming through school now, will have the opportunities that we have, and to make sure that we will be able to innovate, and compete in this country. Those are the real themes politically that will be most prominent as we go towards November ’12.

Here is President Barack Obama in his 2011 State of the Union:

We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time.  We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world.  We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business.  We need to take responsibility for our deficit and reform our government.  That’s how our people will prosper.  That’s how we’ll win the future.

Notice anything?
One of the great ironies of the last several weeks in Washington is that both parties have been reading the same polls. They know what the American people want to hear, a sense of hope, that can-do attitude that America has long embraced at the center of the national narrative. Yet the policy differences about how to fulfill this desire are so far apart that the effect is just the opposite. The nation’s political leaders, rather than lay out a vision for how America can lead again, have demonstrated both domestically and internationally how little hope there is for clear leadership anytime soon. Partisan interests have trumped the common good.

But that won’t stop either side from speaking in the same broad terms about the way forward.

Related Topics: Government
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus