Debt Ceiling Negotiators’ Task: Getting Cantor to Deal

Updated

There’s currently a lot of movement on the chess board of Washington’s debt ceiling game, and much of that action has one goal: returning the pieces back to their original positions — the king next to the queen and the pawns all in a row.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s startling proposition on Tuesday that Republicans drop all hopes to cut spending along with raising the debt ceiling and satisfy themselves with the political victory of three symbolic votes on deficit reduction was met with openness from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the White House. It was also met with furious rejection from House Republicans. Why? Because McConnell’s proposal, along with almost every other move made outside of the GOP freshman class and the House majority leader’s office is all about getting Eric Cantor to compromise.

There is a historic – if more modest than what Obama and Boehner were pulling for – deficit reduction deal on the table. Republicans could walk away from this claiming they cut nearly $2 trillion from the deficit. The sticking point is revenue increases. There’s even a Grover Norquist-endorsed solution to that problem: offset the new revenues with an Alternative Minimum Tax fix. But Cantor is holding his ground unless the package is completely revenue neutral. If he doesn’t get on board, he risks splitting the GOP conference – not to mention potentially bringing down the economy. If it’s insanity, as David Brooks wrote last week, to walk away from the grand bargain — this was the best deal Republicans were going to get in their lifetimes — it’s arguably suicidal to walk away from the smaller package and let the debt ceiling lapse.

Do Reid or Obama really like Mitch McConnell’s offer? No, but sources tell me their openness to it signifies their feeling that even McConnell’s crazy contingency plan is more sane than the intransigence they are seeing from Cantor’s camp inside the negotiating room. Democrats argue they have given significant skin to this deal and it’s unrealistic for Cantor to expect to get a deal without conceding anything. Cantor’s quandary is how to compromise without becoming compromised himself in the eyes of purist freshmen lawmakers. And McConnell’s timing in floating a contingency plan trial balloon implicitly calls into question Cantor’s ability to reach an agreement with Democrats.

Both McConnell’s plan and the White House’s continued push for a grand bargain can be interpreted as closing ranks behind Boehner. If Dems were to accede to Cantor’s demands, it would further weaken Boehner’s speakership — allowing Cantor to succeed where he failed. That’s why all sides are pushing Cantor to give in. With the economy — and possibly the GOP’s prospects at the polls — in his hands, everyone is focused on what Cantor will do.

Update from Cantor’s office:
Eric has approached the debt limit negotiations under Speaker Boehner’s directive to find spending cuts commensurate with the amount of the debt ceiling increase.  Since President Obama has said he would veto any increase that doesn’t carry through the election, that amount is at least $2.4 trillion.  Eric simply is representing the views and principles of the House Republicans that he was elected to lead.”

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Boehner, debt talks, eric cantor, mcconnell, obama, Congress
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus