Bachmann’s Keywords: Against, Won’t, Didn’t

In a new ad set to run statewide in Iowa, Michele Bachmann concentrates on the fiscal-conservative leg of her stool. Still in the early courting stages with Hawkeye voters, she regurgitates her biography first (Iowa-born, tax lawyer, mom), and then she speaks out against the bailouts, against the stimulus and against raising the debt ceiling. “We can’t keep spending money that we don’t have,” she says at the heart of the spot.

Absent are any mention of accomplishments outside her personal life, which can partly be credited to the fact that she’s running a folksy campaign with a concentration on grassroots and personality that is leading some to call her “Huckabee 2.0.” But it’s also a reminder that hers is The Campaign of Didn’t and Won’t. With few legislative accomplishments of her own to draw on, she presents herself as the foil to unpopular policies crafted by others. Capitalizing on the disgruntled zeitgeist is surely a smart move. The question is whether submitting a stack of “no” votes (and promises of more “no” votes to come) is going to hold up as a primary qualification for being President.

The campaign hasn’t said how big the ad buy was, though they called it “significant.”

Katy Steinmetz is a reporter at TIME. Find her on Twitter at @KatySteinmetz. You can also continue the discussion on TIME’s Facebook page and on Twitter at @TIME.

Related Topics: bailouts, debt ceiling, iowa, Michele Bachmann, stimulus, Ads
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus