Pawlenty’s Hope

It remains entirely possible, despite his summer slump, that Tim Pawlenty will win Iowa, and all the attendant money and momentum that comes with that feat. Hiring the daughter-slash-political-advisor of Mike Huckabee, who won Iowa in 2008, probably helps a little bit. If it means that Pawlenty may be lining up an endorsement from Huck himself, that could help substantially. Which, more broadly, is also a reminder that Pawlenty still has a shot at winning Iowa’s all-important evangelical voters. Mitt Romney might snap up most of the state’s moderate and not-very-religious caucus goers. But evangelicals remain up for grabs.

As Amy wrote Tuesday morning, Christian right leaders are eager for Texas Governor Rick Perry to enter what they consider an unsatisfying field. But if Perry doesn’t run, their obvious choices would seem to be Pawlenty and Michelle Bachmann, both of whom have strong evangelical backgrounds. (Gingrich flunks for multiple reasons. The two Mormons are problematic. Cain and Santorum are probably too marginal.) If Bachmann runs a solid and disciplined campaign–without giving up the electrifying style she perfected on cable TV–Pawlenty might be in deep trouble. If he can sow enough doubts about her competency and credibility as an electable nominee, he may yet wind up as the choice of religiously-oriented Iowa voters. Especially if he does wind up getting some help from the man those voters turned into a star in January, 2008.

Related Topics: gop 2012, Tim Pawlenty
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty No. 2), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay-marriage advocates — as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus