Yes, Let’s Kill Ethanol Jobs

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO— As corn ethanol’s Public Enemy Number One – did my plaque get lost in the mail? — I’m thrilled the Senate voted to kill the industry’s fiscally and ecologically ludicrous tax credit. But it was galling — if not too surprising – to hear Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, complain that the “ill-advised” vote would “pull the rug out from under industry.”  That’s the whole point! This particular industry is accelerating the global food crisis and global warming.  Its rug should have been pulled out long ago.

Vilsack also said killing this agribusiness boondoggle would kill jobs, but it should help create jobs in the fledgling advanced biofuels industry. In fact, while the Senate was voting, I happened to be visiting the kind of next-generation biofuels firm that will thrive long after corn ethanol disappears.

The company is called Solazyme, and it re-engineers algae to turn just about any kind of feedstock — sugar cane, switchgrass, crop wastes, whatever — into jet fuels, diesel fuels, and just about any kind of  oil. It’s leveraging the power of evolution—algae naturally produce oil — to create renewable low-carbon alternatives to petroleum that won’t divert so much farmland from food into energy. These aren’t pie-in-the-sky ideas that might work someday; Solazyme is already starting to sell fuel to the Navy. It’s also making oils for nutritional supplements, skin creams, chemicals and other products. Today I got to eat chocolate ice cream made out of algae, with one third the fat and one tenth the cholesterol of regular chocolate ice cream. It tasted like chocolate ice cream.

And did I mention that Solazyme just went public?

There are a lot of interesting companies in the advanced biofuels space, but for years they’ve struggled to raise capital while the smart money has poured into corn ethanol plants, because federal policies virtually assured their success. (Until those federal policies drove the price of corn so high that the plants got into trouble, which is a separate story.) Even if the ethanol tax credits and a companion tariff on foreign ethanol disappear — which would require the cooperation of the House and President Obama — corn ethanol still gets plenty of government help. Congress loves shoveling money to farmers, but in this case, we’d be better off paying them not to grow fuel.

As a Corn Belt senator, Obama was a huge corn ethanol booster. His administration — including Vilsack — has promoted research and development for advanced biofuels as well. His stimulus bill—yes, that again —included $800 million for biomass projects, including $22 million that will help finance Solazyme’s first commercial plant in Peoria. And some high-ranking administration officials — I’m thinking of a certain Nobel laureate —are well aware that corn ethanol is a dud, even worse for the planet than gasoline.

But ethanol subsidies are not dead yet.  “We need reforms and a smarter biofuels program, but simply cutting off support for the industry isn’t the right approach,” Vilsack said. Oh, it’s exactly the right approach. If you want a smarter biofuels program, getting rid of the dumbest giveaway is the obvious way to start.

Related Topics: biofuels, California, ethanol, obama, vilsack, Viewpoint
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus