Bibi and Barack, the Sequel

I’ve already registered my skepticism that not much will come of Obama’s assertion yesterday that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

The statement is not, as many are claiming today, a demand for a return to pre-1967 borders: 1967 lines refer at most to the deployment of Syrian, Jordanian and Egyptian forces on the eve of the 1967 war. Nor is it, as many other are claiming, the first time an American President has called for a return to those lines: Johnson, Nixon, Ford and Carter all did.

Most of all, the statement is not a radical departure from prior U.S. policy and it will not change much in the run-up to September’s vote on Palestinian statehood at the UN.

It’s worth keeping all that in mind as the theatrics unfold around the meeting this morning between Netanyahu and Obama at the White House. I wrote a lengthy profile of their relationship a year ago, and it will be interesting to watch how deeply the two men allow themselves to get tied up in personal disputes today.

The substance of the disagreement between them today is really negligible–if there are problems between them — public, private or leaked — it says more about the relationship than about the reality in Israel and Palestine.

Related Topics: Diplomacy
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus