Is Tim Pawlenty the Process-of-Elimination Candidate?

That’s part of the takeaway from Crowley’s magazine profile, hitting newsstands Friday:

But in a strange way, the stars could be aligning for Pawlenty. It’s been said that the 2012 Republican campaign has been a gong show, featuring more dropouts than volunteers. (Mike Huckabee, Haley Barbour and Trump have all stepped back in recent weeks, and Sarah Palin is a question mark at best.) After months of uncertainty, the GOP field seems to have congealed around a handful of candidates who could plausibly win the nomination: Pawlenty, Newt Gingrich, former U.S. ambassador to China Jon Huntsman and the consensus front runner, Mitt Romney. “Pawlenty is a very credible candidate for the nomination,” says former GOP chairman Ed Gillespie. “I would not be surprised if at the end of the day it comes down to him and somebody else.” In an unusually weak 2012 Republican field, it’s just possible that Tim Pawlenty will be the last Republican standing.

The “somebody else,” as Crowley goes on to point out, is probably Romney. Pawlenty’s path to a nomination squarely depends on uniting Republicans uncomfortable with elements of Romney’s much fussed-over history. And that, essentially, is how Pawlenty is selling himself:

“I think I’m the one candidate in the race who can unite and excite the whole conservative movement and the Republican Party,” he says, arguing that he can appeal at once to conservatives focused on social issues, the budget and national security. “I think most of the other candidates are going to appeal to one of those buckets. But I can appeal to all of them deeply and authentically, and I’ve got the record to back it up.”

Related Topics: 2012, gop, mitt romney, Tim Pawlenty
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus