Grim Mideast Reality Curtails Obama’s Reformist Vision

REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

In his much-hyped speech on the Middle East scheduled for Thursday, President Barack Obama will argue that the region’s anti-autocratic uprisings and the death of Osama bin Laden have laid a foundation for democratic and economic change.

But the most urgent issue of the day will be unaddressed: how Obama, or anyone else for that matter, can prevent a new outbreak of violence between Palestinians and Israelis that could terminally damage hopes for peace in the region, and undermine the prospects for moderate change in the Arab world.

There’ll be plenty of talk on other issues, some of it consequential, some of it diversionary. Obama will unveil a multi-billion dollar program to aid the democratic transition in the region through economic reform. Around $1 billion will come in the form of loan guarantees; more will come from repurposed debt forgiveness; still more will come from international financial institutions like the IMF and the World Bank.

The financial aid will be as much defensive as proactive. The political upheaval in Tunisia and Egypt have dramatically reduced economic activity, shrinking tourist income and threatening to derail the economies of those two countries, whose political transformations one senior administration official said Wednesday are “hugely important” for the future of the region.

Obama will also highlight new sanctions against Syrian leader Bashar al Assad, and adopt some of the tough language recently used by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden to rebuke him. That break from weeks of modulated criticism reflects the growing conviction held by members of the Obama the administration that the already weak Assad will not soon recover from the uprising in his country, only becoming more beholden to Iran and less amenable to warming relations with the west.

But what of defusing mounting tensions between Palestinians and Israelis? Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who recently reunited with Hamas, is pursuing UN recognition for an independent Palestinian state and will almost certainly get it in September. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, eager to secure U.S. and European opposition to that move, made symbolic concessions in a speech to the Knesset Monday. But Netanyahu also signaled he is preparing for conflict with the Palestinians by declaring that their primary and overriding aim remains the destruction of the state of Israel.

The risky Palestinian move for statehood, combined with Netanyahu’s continued reactive approach to peace, is already heightening tensions. “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s foreign-policy address to the Knesset on Monday made one thing clear: He is preparing for a confrontation with the Palestinians,” wrote Aluf Benn Wednesday in Ha’aretz. Says one Israeli diplomat: “Any little thing can ignite the whole area now.”

That is the really urgent issue now, and unless Obama has a way to address it, lofty talk of regional democratic transformation will ring hollow.

Related Topics: abbas, mideast, netanyahu, obama, Diplomacy
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus