Wishful Thinking in Afghanistan

Many good things may come from the death of Osama bin Laden. But the prospect that thousands of Taliban fighters will suddenly lay down their arms seems unlikely to be one of them–despite this hopeful assessment by Maj. Gen. John F. Campbell of the 101st Airborne Division:

[T]he images of Bin Laden living in comfort in a Pakistan safe house may undermine the morale of frontline insurgent fighters, General Campbell said, coming as some insurgent foot soldiers are said to be expressing frustration with their leadership’s commanding from the relative safety of Pakistan.

“I think the insurgents are going to say, ‘Hey, you know, why am I doing this?’ ” he said. “And I think there’s great potential for many of the insurgents to say, ‘Hey, I want to reintegrate.’ ”

The Obama White House has promoted an image of bin Laden lounging comfortably in a “million dollar compound.” And, sure, he wasn’t holed up in a cave. But he clearly wasn’t living “Big Willie style,” either. The video footage of bin Laden watching himself on TV, in particular, depicts a tired old man trapped in a dingy little room. (By the way: The bin Laden fortune wasn’t enough to buy a flat screen?) The Hearst Castle this was not.

More important, precious few Taliban insurgents were fighting for bin Laden to begin with. Most see themselves, as Joe has explained, waging a nationalist war of Pashtun liberation. It seems rather unlikely that substantial numbers would suddenly quit that fight simply because Osama was enjoying satellite TV in his cruddy compound rather than, say, subsisting on bats in some gloomy Waziristan cave.

Related Topics: Afghanistan
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus