In the Arena

The Wire War

Andrew Sullivan notes the similarity between The Wire and the actual intelligence campaign to get Bin Laden. But there were also striking similarities to the war in Iraq, oft-noted by some of my intelligence sources back when that war was flaming: In the tv show, the conflict between the slow-moving, hierarchical, unimaginative Baltimore police department and the horizontal, guerilla-like, constantly innovating drug gangs. Sound familiar?

In Iraq, success–such as it was–only came when the US military flattened out its decision-making structure, began dealing directly with (that is, buying) tribes and instituting a form of community policing (counter-insurgency) that provided security for the locals who in turn provided information about where the bad guys were. The special unit in The Wire was a classic, counterinsurgency/special ops force–down to the quirky, creative personalities of the team’s members. The drug dealers were a classic guerrilla insurgency, down to the chaotic, murderous rivalry among factions.

That’s one of the reasons I loved the show so much–it mirrored the reporting I was doing on the Iraq war. Another reason was that it was the first TV show that reflected the urban realities I’d reported on in New York during the 1980s and 90s. The final reason was that it was just so damn good–the 21st century equivalent of the grand, intricate 19th century novels. If you haven’t seen it yet, you’re missing one of the great cultural achievements of the past decade. And it never won an Emmy. Arrgh.

Related Topics: Miscellany
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus