Daniels Will Sign Abortion Bill

Governor Mitch Daniels, the man who proposed a “truce” on social issues, will sign a bill restricting abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and making Indiana the first state to choke off government funding to Planned Parenthood clinics. The AP reports:

Daniels said he supported the abortion restrictions from the outset and that the provision added to defund Planned Parenthood did not change his mind. He said women’s health, family planning and other services will remain available.

“The principle involved commands the support of an overwhelming majority of Hoosiers,” Daniels said in a statement announcing his intention to sign the bill when it arrives on his desk in about a week.

But doing so also puts Daniels’ state at risk of losing $4 million a year in federal family planning grants likely to be cut off because of the legislation. Daniels, known as a fiscal hawk, did not address the loss in his statement.

His decision will inevitably lead to chatter of a presidential bid, but his hands were pretty much tied. A veto could’ve sparked a conservative backlash against him, both from statehouse Republicans in Indiana and social conservatives nationwide. He could have opted to let the bill languish on his desk for a few days, at which point it would have become law anyway, but that would’ve invited both conservative discontent and opened him up to charges that he’d simply ducked a tough choice. That he announced his decision late on a Friday afternoon might say something about his eagerness (or lack thereof) to see the story carried widely in the national media.

Daniels was always pro-life, but his conservative legislature put him in a tricky spot. If he does have presidential ambitions, this kind of legislation can be a great asset in a GOP primary — and a serious albatross in a general election. Earlier this year, Daniels managed to convince Republican allies in the legislature  to back off a “right to work” bill restricting labor unions in the state, arguing that Democrats’ protests and procedural maneuvers would sabotage the rest of his agenda (and that he’d already addressed collective bargaining issues.) This time, he couldn’t escape the dilemma.

Related Topics: Abortion
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus