Could Last Week’s Spending Compromise Fall Apart?

Update, 3:35 PM

By a 260-167 vote, the bill has passed the House with bipartisan support. HR 1473 will keep the government open through Sept. 30, the end of the 2011 fiscal year. Fifty-nine Republicans broke with their party to vote against the deal, a spike from the 28 who supported the one-week bridge resolution that bought time for lawmakers to craft the bill. Eighty-one Democrats supported it. Without Democratic support, the bill would have failed. 

It was tempting to forget, in the wake of the agreement to avoid a government shutdown, that party leaders don’t govern by fiat. The deal struck Friday night by John Boehner, Harry Reid and President Obama was merely a framework. Since the details were unveiled in the early hours of Tuesday morning, the rumblings of unease that provided a backbeat to the negotiations — drowned out for much of this week by all the shouting about Paul Ryan’s budget and President Obama’s rejoinder — have returned. Yesterday the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the deal will trim federal outlays by $352 million during the remainder of the fiscal year, which is less than 1% of the $38 billion splashed across triumphant press releases. The comparatively meager figure heightens the risk that House Tea Partyers and deficit hawks, who were already irked by the compromise, could rebel in large enough numbers that John Boehner is forced to find a cohort of moderate Democrats to push the deal over the finish line.

“A lot of guys will flip,” says a House Republican aide, who expects Boehner will find 218 members to pass the CR, but that the margin will be “really narrow. They’re whipping hard for votes.” Segments of the conservative base have declared open war against the heretics who waffle on their commitment to cost-cutting. RedState’s Eric Erickson argued in a blog post this morning that Republicans who vote to cut just $352 million –”that’s million with an ‘m’“– should be “driven into the street by the Tea Party movement and horsewhipped.” For his part, Tea Party Patriots’ co-chair Mark Meckler suggested, as he often does, that GOPers aligning behind this deal or a debt-limit hike face the possibility of a primary.

At a press conference this morning, Boehner allowed that the CBO estimate had “caused some confusion.” In an argument tailored t0 reassure his members, Boehner said the debate over federal spending in Washington had “shifted 180 degrees.” A number of House freshmen have said they’ll support the compromise as the opening ante in the long, high-stakes poker game that’s just getting started. Even the deal’s skeptics are eager to close the book on the CR and move onto bigger skirmishes over the 2012 budget, which the House is debating this morning, and a debt-limit issue that both parties are portraying as “Armageddon.”

It’s hard to predict exactly how House Democrats, who were frozen out of the negotiations over the 2011 spending bill, will come down. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, who snapped at a senior White House official Wednesday for failing to solicit her caucus’s input, said she hadn’t made up her mind about the bill. “It’s pretty evident the House Democrats were not a part of that agreement,” Pelosi said. “I feel no ownership over that or any responsibility to it, except that we do not want to shut down the government.” Even if Boehner’s hard-liners defect en masse, he should still be able to nab a number of Democrats, Pelosi acknowledged. “I’ve always thought that if he didn’t get to 218 on his own, there would be Democrats who could put it over the top,” she said, adding that “the fact that many of us have an unease with what’s in there should signal to Republicans” that the pact is favorable to the GOP. But a House Democratic aide predicted to the Huffington Post that as few as 50 Democrats would support the measure. Pelosi said Democrats are not whipping their members, but minority whip Steny Hoyer is supporting the deal. Moderate Democrats seem likely to follow his lead.

Even if it seems poised to pass, a deal that seemed almost an afterthought amid the hoopla this week could wind up a lot closer that most people anticipated. Stay tuned.

Related Topics: Budgets
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • square1

    Kudos to Obama to obtaining the best deal that he could possibly get without the support of the minority leader.

    Sure, some might quibble that the deal could have been better if Obama didn’t shoot for a “majority of the majority” as Boehner wanted. But there will always be critics.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    So Boehner, desperate to make a deal, either didn’t bother to read the fine print or lied to his fellow House Republicans. Or both.

    I don’t see an easy way out for Boehner on this one.

    If Boehner tries to force the deal through the House, the Teabaggers will eat his – and the GOPers who vote with him – lunches.

    Boehner can’t work with the House Dems – cause they will have to get something they want in order to support the deal…and then whatever concessions he makes have to somehow garner enough support from his own people to get the deal through.

    Even if he’s able to get enough support in the House, there’s still negotiations with the White House and Senate…and threatening to shut down the government again? Can’t go to the well on that again; blame will get placed purely on Boehner and the rest of the GOP House for reneging, disarray, and general dumbarsery.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Meanwhile…

    (via)

  • Ivy_B

    It just passed the House, 260-167.

  • theotherjimmyolson

    I liked it G-C.

  • hippooath

    Loved it – where’s the GOP ‘It’s a like’ guy?

  • hippooath

    like=lie

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Without Democratic support, the bill would have failed.

    Apparently they waited a looong time to cast their votes.

    Note to Obama and Boehner: House Dems are still a wee bit relevant.

  • Ivy_B

    However, the House is now re-inserting defunding Planned Parenthood. So much for agreement.

  • outsider2011

    Close the gov’t, and let the GOP reap the voters wrath

  • Ivy_B

    Sorry, that was the Senate trying to defund Planned Parenthood. Failed.

blog comments powered by Disqus