Four Hidden Messages In Obama’s 2012 Reelection Launch

If you haven’t yet seen it, here is the video that President Obama is using to launch his 2012 campaign.

Notice anything? Here’s what I saw:

1. The new slogan–”It begins with us”–is not a statement of fact. It is an aspiration, and it may yet be a reach. Presidential campaigns don’t begin collectively. They begin with the candidate, who hopes to excite people and usually fails. But Obama is determined to once-again sell his campaign as people-powered and bottom-up, even as he builds another classic top-down messaging operation that will rely heavily on high-dollar donors. In 2008, Obama largely succeeded in this sales pitch, rallying hundreds of thousands of volunteers to his cause. But since 2008, his self-described movement has gradually eroded, and the grassroots organization that Obama set up with his old email list, called Organizing for America, has struggled under the twin mission of serving the president’s interests and serving the interests of its members. (Most recently, the White House was forced to awkwardly deny that it was involved in OFA efforts to encourage union protests in Wisconsin.) Will Obama be able to remake the magic? Maybe, but organizing depends on rallying around a common foe, and many of the common foes that united independent and liberal voters in 2008–George W. Bush, the Iraq War, a sense that Republicans were to blame for government dysfunction and national decline–are not so evident today.

2. While Republicans worry about appeasing the base and winning the primaries, Obama will be running for the general election from the start. Look at the video’s opening montage: A corn-field, a small-town church, a row of middle class homes with the stars and stripes flying on the stoop. These are not the scenes of places where Obama will find most of his voters in 2012. (In 2008, he won urban voters, who made up 30% of the electorate, by 10 points, and lost rural voters, who made up 21% of the country, by about 2 points.) Obama knows that the 2012 election will swing on a whether he can perform well on the margins between rural and urban, so he will be doing everything he can to win back those parts of the country where folks fly the stars and bars at the front door. Let’s just pray he doesn’t start wearing a Carhartt jacket.

3. Obama is telegraphing his target demographics. Just look at the people who speak: A Hispanic woman from Nevada, a white guy from North Carolina, a peach-faced college kid, a white woman from Colorado, a black woman from Michigan. Notice the emphasis on women, who fill in just about every b-roll shot from the video. If you find yourself in one of these demographics, expect to be getting more junk mail than the rest of us over the next few years.

4. Obama will be running on his character. The most interesting quote of the video comes from the southern white guy. “I don’t agree with Obama on everything. But I respect him and I trust him.” Consider what an extraordinary line this is for a video meant to recruit volunteers to organize for a presidential campaign. Have you ever met a campaign organizer that goes door-to-door or works the phones for a candidate that they admit they don’t agree with? The reasoning behind this line can be found in a recent Associated Press poll. As of late March, 53% of the country approved of the way Obama was doing his job as president. But 59% said they had a favorable view of Obama, 59% said Obama “cares about people like” them, and 84% said he was a likable person. Obama would rather make his pitch to 84% of the country than from 53% of the country. That white guy from North Carolina represents the gap between.

Related Topics: 2012 campaign, Barack Obama
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • chupkar

    I’d like to see a comparison of “messages” from campaign runs of sitting presidents. I mean, you just cannot run like a virgin(ish) candidate. And if it is so weak, those GOPers are sure hanging back for no reason. Of course if Bachmann continues to outstrip Romney in raising money, that ought to be enough to get every half sane liberal and libral leaning person to the polls.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Look at the video’s opening montage: A corn-field, a small-town church, a row of middle class homes with the stars and stripes flying on the stoop. These are not the scenes of places where Obama will find most of his voters in 2012.”

    .
    Fairy tales and Unicorns.
    .

  • allthingsinaname

    I think the intent is to bore us into submission.

  • sacredh

    “Will Obama be able to remake the magic? Maybe, but organizing depends on rallying around a common foe, and many of the common foes that united independent and liberal voters in 2008–George W. Bush, the Iraq War, a sense that Republicans were to blame for government dysfunction and national decline–are not so evident today.”
    .
    There’s the Tea Party. There’s Michele Bachmann. There’s Sarah Palin. I think the flip side of the coin is what kind of magic will the republicans be able to conjure up? Worker’s rights are being assualted. The republicans are threatening a government shutdown. Popular programs are being cut by the republicans. There’s plenty of issues the democrats can rally around. It may be more evident than you believe.

  • chupkar

    Worker’s rights, child labor laws, not one jobs bill. Running on social issues will not cut it. It’ll be a case of firing up your own side and as we see, none of the 2010 elections were huge landslides and they have managed to alienate half the independents that voted for them already.

  • allthingsinaname

    Rallying around the opposition is what the GOP does. It doesn’t work for the rest of us. It isn’t enough to be anti, we need to be pro.

  • michaelfury
  • propman

    “folks fly the stars and bars at the front door”
    MS WTF.
    .
    The stars and bars is the nick name for the flag of the Confederate State of America, not the rebel battle flag of the Confederacy, but the national flag of the CSA.
    .
    I think you mean the “Stars and Stripes”. Nick name for the flag of our nation.
    .
    In my suburban neighborhood, someone flying the rebel flag would be identified as making a racial statement. Someone flying “the star and bars” would just evoke confusion as to what country they hailed from.
    .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America#First_national_flag_.28.22the_Stars_and_Bars.22.29

  • americanwithabrain

    It’s sad if the best the Democrats can do is run on a “Look, their candidates suck worse that our incumbent!”

    And that statement that Obama is STARTING to campaign is laughable. He hasn’t stopped campaigning and started being President yet.

    Hope and Change. I hope we can change the president in 2012.

  • lreed580

    4.1 Absolutely agree. Although I don’t live in the states with Republican governors who are trying to enact legislation that is out to eliminate workers’ rights and cut programs that benefit the working class and poor while giving tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations, I am following it closely and contributing when and where I can. I’m really encouraged by their passion and commitment.

  • nflfoghorn

    AWB, that’s politics as usual. Ever hear a Republican guy say they’re “intellectually superior” to their opponent? No? Then they go for the patriotic angle and the tax cut thing or the morality stand. Never “my policies are better than my opponent’s.”

  • http://scrimbul.wordpress.com scrimbul

    @allthings
    .
    I’m pro-sanity. Are you?

  • allthingsinaname

    Do you have a point to make? If so, I sure wish you would let me in on it.

  • http://scrimbul.wordpress.com scrimbul

    @allthings
    .
    I’ll decide if I have a point once I understand yours.
    .
    The implication is that there is no sane sustainable difference between the (admittedly rare) policy ideas that rustydog and 3xfired and Michelle Bachmann. Keeping those individuals out of the mainstream is the responsibility of every moderate thinking individual, not just ‘lefties’.
    .
    And honestly outside of evangelicals and media moguls trying to make a statement, as a nation we’re more ambivalent to social issues than the GOP would like to believe, barring abortion. But social issues are all the GOP has.
    .
    If you don’t think sending the GOP into the wilderness for good isn’t a noble goal at this point, like putting down a rabid dog (2010 was their chance to prove it wouldn’t be the year 2000 to 2008 all over again) then I don’t know what to tell you. There’s nothing at all wrong with the things conservatives want or the fact that they feel a little more insecure in today’s world than the rest of us, but their representatives are atrocious and the anti-intellectual worship needs to stop immediately.

  • americanwithabrain

    Pro class warfare? Evil rich, downtrodden poor?

    Let me show you the questions “collective bargining” addresses:

    Why should union members have to pay ANYTHING for retirement and insurance?

    Why should paychecks stop just because of retirement?

    Why should union members have to worry about being fired for being a poor (or non) performer?

    On the other hand, out here in the real world…..

    I, as a non union worker, pay part of my insurance and pay into my 401K, and that is as it should be. It’s called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY– try it sometime.

    My paychecks stop when I retire, it’s up to me to take care of myself after retirement. That’s also how it should be.

    If I perform poorly or not at all, I get fired. That’s as it should be. I don’t need union goons threatening my employer for rightfully firing me.

    We live in a free, capitalist economy. If the economy takes a dive, or some lunitic gets elected president and spends like there’s no tomorrow on bailouts and health care entitlements (God Forbid; oops, too late), and my employer’s business goes south and he has to lay me off or let me go, that is as it should be. Tough for me, but I don’t want union goons telling my employer he has to sink his ship in order to keep a bunch of people he can’t afford on the payroll.

    Unions can’t accept this, because people without jobs can’t pay union dues, and that’s the #1 consideration, keeping dues coming in. Even at the expense of destroying businesses. They almost killed the American Automobile industry.

    Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.

  • freeinpa

    “Rallying around the opposition is what the GOP does. It doesn’t work for the rest of us.”
    .
    And being in a constant state of delusion and lying to themselves is what works for you and the Dems. It is the only explanation that could be if you actually said the above with a straight face

  • allthingsinaname

    It isn’t enough, this fight has been going on longer than you have been alive. It is repeated over and over again, it never changes.
    .
    No I am not happy with just getting them out of office, they just return; why is that? Because of the bold action of the Democrats?
    .
    You throw bones at dogs. You fetch I am sick of it.

  • americanwithabrain

    Also, it will be interesting to see if HIllary is going to challange Obama. I’m sure that Democrat powers-that-be will do everything in their powers to prevent this, but she has ambition that is absolutely unbridled, and I don’t think she pictures her legacy without a stint in the oval office. I enjoyed the verbal blood-letting in the ’08 primary debates. Seeing Hillary and Obama point out what crappy candidates they both were was entertaining. And.. I agreed with both of them, a rare occurence!

  • paulejb

    The message appears to be that it is all the fault of disinterested Democrat voters. Barack Hussein Obama has been working like he has never worked before and the lazy, good for nothing Dems all stayed home in 2010. Obama is telling his people that they had better wake up if they expect the government gravy train to continue to roll.

  • paulejb

    How is Obama going to explain this disappointment? None of this appears to have come to fruition.
    .

  • paulejb

    nflfoghorn@8.1,
    .
    “Ever hear a Republican guy say they’re ‘intellectually superior’ to their opponent.”
    .
    Of course not. It is rude to state the obvious.

  • newfreedomblog

    “The rise of the oceans will slow, the planet will heal. People who are jobless will have jobs. I am Barack, the anointed One. Believe!!”
    /

  • shepherdwong

    …a sense that Republicans were to blame for government dysfunction and national decline–are not so evident today.
    .
    Are you f@cking kidding?! Inasmuch as that may be true, it’s because your industry has failed miserably to do its job to inform the public (again). Republicans are government dysfunction. It’s their raison d’etra. And your readers have to explain that to you. Just pathetic.

  • newfreedomblog

  • americanwithabrain

    “I’ll decide if I have a point once I understand yours.”

    This statement reminded me of Pelosi’s famous “We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It”

    Don’t let you lack of a point stop you from making statements. It’s the liberal way.

  • americanwithabrain

    Now that’s bi-partisian if I ever heard it.

    All black and white, no gray area. And no gray matter.

  • sacredh

    “Of course not. It is rude to state the obvious.”
    .
    It’s also rude to lie.

  • http://scrimbul.wordpress.com scrimbul

    @allthings
    .
    I can’t possibly be the only individual that realizes the GOP pre-90′s and post 1994 are two totally different polarized animals. I’ve been alive less than half of the years of the majority of commenters on the board.
    .
    Things are shaping up to be very different this time around just like you want. You can’t get rid of moronic representatives of either party, they are a cancer. But you can contain it until you find a way to cure it. Just because Blue Dogs helped squander that advantage the last four years doesn’t mean they will screw it up again, as electoral memory these days is shaping up to be much longer than it used to be.
    .
    I honestly think there is no individual that understands this better than Boehner lately. I don’t agree with him, and he’s made some public statements that are pretty clearly appeasement of his own party but I don’t envy the position he’s in, having to find a way to push a legitimately conservative agenda with this pack of idiots called the Tea Party plus all the old idiots in tow.

  • paulejb

    sacredh@8.3,
    .
    Sure, but Democrats do it so well, especially Barack Hussein Obama.

  • shepherdwong

    Bipartisanship is for morons. All gray area, no gray matter.

  • paulejb

    shepherdwong@14.2,
    .
    Want a one party government, wong? They have one in China.

  • http://obamasociety.wordpress.com obamasociety

    My blog is about Obama so I think that if you are interested in him than maybe you should go and check out my blog.
    I would love it if you could read and comment on my blog.

    http://theunitedsociety.blogspot.com/

  • shepherdwong

    Want a one party government, wong? They have one in China.
    .
    We’ll be there in no time, if liars and morons (and “journalists”) keep acting as if Republicans care about anything except complete corporate control of government.
    .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

  • http://obamasociety.wordpress.com obamasociety

    My blog is about Obama so I think that if you are interested in him than maybe you should go and check out my blog.
    I would love it if you could read and comment on my blog.

    http://theunitedsociety.blogspot.com/

  • fhmadvocat

    in response to 9.1

    While I am not one for class warfare, class warfare is going on and the Very Wealthy are winning.

    If you look at the last 40 years, the income of the middle class has been stagnant and the very rich has been going up and up and up.

    There is a saying that a chain is only has strong as its weakest link. There was once upon a time when this country had a strong middle class. Now the middle class is being strained and we expect our workers to work for Walmart size wages and we wonder why our economy hasn’t picked up. Every country has its rich class. It is the standard of the living of the middle class which measures how well a society is doing.

    In an ideal world, wages should have gone up with the level of productivity. Instead, wages lag way behind and owners keep most of the money gained by increased worker production.

    Companies are making record profits, hoarding the cash and are not hiring. Considering the record profits, how can you blame that on Obama? As far as the bailout, that was George Bush who bailed out Wall Street. Sure Obama bailed out the auto industry, but it has been done before. And most of that money has been paid back.

    I am a white collar worker, never formally belonged to a union, but before unions, America was a second rate economic power. We have a powerful middle class because unions made it possible. Every person who was not born wealthy, who has a good job owes a debt to what unions did for this country. There would be no middle class without unions.

    As far as the public worker’s union in Wisconsin, they agreed to pay into their pension fund and to pay for their insurance like the private sector. The governor has worked to break the union and is suffering from backlash. That is because Scott Walker did not campaign on breaking the unions when he was running for office.

  • paulejb

    shepherdwong@14.4,
    .
    Are you referring to the crony capitalism that goes on between the advocates of big government and big corporations? If you are, than your problem is with the party of big government. Just look at the cozy relationship between Democrats and Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs alone gave Obama a cool million bucks in 2008.

  • apr2563

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/201104040008
    .
    The liberal media:
    .
    Will Media Give Monday’s Nationwide Union Rallies As Much Coverage As Tiny Tea Party Event?
    .
    By the way, by the time Republicans get through demonizing all minorities, Muslims, AARP, homosexuals, young people, teachers, fire fighters, police officers, nurses, airline pilots, blue collar union members, etc., they will have a small constituency made up of bigots, theocrats, and the very wealthy.

  • russpoter

    His negatives are above 50% (danger zone) and no one with a brain believes a word he says (“Hope! Change! Conned you good!”). He’s so weak, he has brought out a flood of candidates who know his NANNY-STATE can be beat — even Trump.

    OK — play the race card — that’s all you Regulation Nazis have.

  • 4chris10s

    He may be a nice guy, but I don’t believe it and I still don’t trust him.

  • tanboontee

    Have we not heard enough of his sales talk?

    Has he reached what he promised before?

    A democrat would win the next presidency, practically by default, thanks to the lack-luster and sickly GOP. (vzc1943)

  • shepherdwong

    Just look at the cozy relationship between Democrats and Goldman Sachs.
    .
    Right, bankers love Democrats more than Republicans.

    The whole point is corporate control of the entire apparatus of government, you dishonest, partisan moron. The corporate borg doesn’t care what party it’s buying, it’s collecting the entire enterprise. The other point is, there remain perhaps a handful of US Senators, a score or two of US Congressmen (mostly in the Progressive Caucus) and a minority of federal and Supreme Court judges who aren’t owned and controlled by corporate interests, and they’re all Democrats. You’re on the wrong side of the class war.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/04/27/wall-street-rules-help-gop-fill-campaign-coffers/

  • paulejb

    shepherdwong@14.6,
    .
    All big business types love big government types. Together that pass tax laws and regulations that squeeze out the little guy to keep him from competing with the big boys.
    .
    It is the Democrat party which is in bed with the big corporations. They think alike and their goal is control..
    .
    You, my friend, are just another dupe who believes the line that Democrats are for the little people.

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    Did you guys notice, around 1:15 sec, the adult Hispanic man who is outside nonchalantly playing a pink Nintendo DS on a bright sunny day?

    It seems that Obama is also, if subtly, trying to appeal to nerds, men who live with their parents, and gays all at the same time.

    Or am I just assuming?

  • http://lindseyb89.wordpress.com lindseyb89

    Couldn’t of said it any better myself!

blog comments powered by Disqus