Religious Leaders Launch Fast to Protest Budget Cuts

Earlier this morning, religious leaders and anti-poverty advocates announced that they will begin fasting to protest budget cuts that they argue “balance the budget on the backs of poor people.” Progressive evangelical leader Jim Wallis and David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, joined former Democratic congressman Tony Hall in calling on others to join them in the fast and on Congress to restore funding for hunger programs and other anti-poverty initiatives.

When he served as a congressman from Ohio in the 1990s, Tony Hall fasted for 22 days in response to budget cuts and the elimination of the House Select Committee on Hunger. At the time, the committee had a nominal budget and no power to appropriate or authorize funds–its termination was trumpeted as a budget-cutting measure but had virtually no practical effect except to eliminate a congressional body focused on the issue of mass hunger.

Wallis charges that similarly cynical politics are behind the current proposed cuts in programs that target the poor in the U.S. and internationally. “If this was really about fiscal responsibility, they’d go where the money was,” he told me by phone last Friday. “Every day we’re spending more in Libya than everything we’d like to keep in the budget. That’s turning around the Biblical imperatives and beating your plowshares into swords. You’re not going to solve the deficit with these programs. This is just mean. This is not believing the government should help poor people as a principle.”

Religious organizations from the National Association of Evangelicals to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops have criticized proposed federal budgets to means-tested programs as immoral and unjust. And Wallis, Beckmann, and Hall are attracting support for their fast from an array of partners, including the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Islamic Relief USA, and Meals on Wheels. They haven’t yet decided how long they’ll continue the fast, but Wallis issued an additional challenge to members of Congress who support cuts in anti-poverty programs: be honest. “I want to hear just one of them say out loud that every line item of military spending is more important to the well-being of the country than child nutrition, than child health and vaccinations. They’ve crossed a line, but they want to keep pretending this is all about fiscal responsibility.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • nflfoghorn

    To twist MM’s phrase, the Republicans just don’t care about you losing weight.
    .
    I’m not too keen on fasting as a means of bringing about change, although it goes hand-in-hand with prayer for those that use it. But the point is well-taken: Fed and state governments want to cut these services to, ostensibly, balance their budgets, but the net effect of such “cuts” is that: a) people suffer and b) $ shifts from one just cause to another, likely less-deserving, one.

  • freeinpa

    I wonder if we will hear the separation of church and state argument?

    Or if the left will now take up all causes supported by religious organizations

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Thanks, Amy, for posting this.

    “I want to hear just one of them say out loud that every line item of military spending is more important to the well-being of the country than child nutrition, than child health and vaccinations. They’ve crossed a line, but they want to keep pretending this is all about fiscal responsibility.”

    Good luck with that…because there’s another message being pushed:

    And she addressed calls for a GOP truce on social issues, saying, “We’ve been told we need a truce on social issues and I would highly disagree with that because social conservatism is fiscal conservatism.”

    /facepalm

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Amy. It’s too bad you (and others) have to label evangelicals as progressive or conservative for our clarity. I thought Jesus’ teachings leaned left; He certainly didn’t say, “Blessed are the rich.” Or maybe it really was, “Blessed are the cheesemakers.” Amy, is Hall going after state cuts as much as Fed ones? Many new R gov’s. are just as cutthroat as the TP’s in Congress, if not more so.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “I wonder if we will hear the separation of church and state argument?”
    .
    Based on your invocation of it here, you don’t really know what that means, do you?

  • allthingsinaname

    “Wallis charges that similarly cynical politics are behind the current proposed cuts in programs that target the poor in the U.S. and internationally.”
    .
    Cynical? I do not think so. Everyone knows the less money one has the less political capital one has. It has nothing to do with being cynical and everything to do with not caring.
    .
    The GOP just doesn’t care about you.

  • newfreedomblog

    Oh gee, the “Rev” Jim Wallis, Obama’s new spiritual advisor is fasting. Great news.
    .
    When will Wallis get a review here at TIME.com as to his social justice and socialist motives and advocation? Will this be before or after he starts eating again?

  • nflfoghorn

    FTW, MM!

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    As long as tax dollars are used to force people to help their fellow man, the cycle of dependency on the government will continue and God’s blessings won’t flow. However, if we Christians were all to do our part in loving our neighbors, the need for government intervention would be all but eliminated and prosperity would reign in the land. We have many organizations working to feed the hungry, etc., and they just need willing people to give of themselves in order to succeed. Read Matthew 25:35-40… http://www.compassioncentral.org.

  • nflfoghorn

    Jesus had socialist tendencies.
    .
    He turned water into wine and gave it out to the masses at a wedding.
    He knocked over the flea market at the temple.
    He fed 9,000 people by weapons of mass-production (WMP).
    And He said something about always having the poor around.
    .
    I don’t think He was necessarily dealing with a democracy at the time He was crucified, either.

  • hippooath

    How about we restore the American dream so people can succeed and fail and it isn’t stacked against anyone trying and for anyone that already have all the breaks? That way we don’t have to rely on Government and religion for the basic opportunity to live the American dream.

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    to nflfoghorn… I disagree that Jesus had socialist tendencies… He believes in giving through free will, not forced giving. He gave from the heart out of love, which is what He wants from us. He didn’t steal other peoples money (taxes) and give it away through entitlement programs.

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    I think that any dream that relies on either the government or religion instead of God is doomed to fail. Jesus doesn’t expect religion or government to help man succeed or fail. He expects us to love one another and when that happens, His blessings flow. (Matthew 6:33 seek first the kingdom of God and all these things (where to sleep, what to eat, what to wear) will be added to you.) The “Kingdom” of God is in serving one another from a loving heart.

  • allthingsinaname

    I guess it just depends on what Christian Values you want the Government to reflect.
    .
    The GOP just doesn’t care about you.

  • nflfoghorn

    But the compassion He showed on behalf of the downtrodden is stuff of which neocons want to get rid via social programs that have been around for decades. Back then they didn’t have Social Security, banks, or other safety nets. But there were tax collectors and doing things for “the least of these.”
    .
    You’re not saying all–or even a huge minority–of poor people steal from the rich (or don’t deserve compassion from the rich) are you?

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    The point is, I don’t want or need the GOP or DNC to care about me. They should stay out of the way and let us take care of ourselves and one another.

  • allthingsinaname

    So the Government of the People, by the People and for the People means nothing?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “He didn’t steal other peoples money (taxes) and give it away through entitlement programs.”
    .
    Give unto Cesar what is Cesar’s.
    .
    I may have left religion behind, but, I remember who Jesus Christ was, and he sure as hell wasn’t a fat bozo walking around dressed like George Washington holding an automatic weapon screaming that the president is a communist.
    .
    Cesar was a pretty nasty guy, yet, look for the part of the bible where Jesus got involved in politics.
    .
    It’s not there.

    .

  • Paul-no not that one

    ” He didn’t steal other peoples money (taxes) ”
    .
    So the “render unto Caeser” stuff was what?

  • afguy

    to nflfoghorn… I disagree that Jesus had socialist tendencies… He believes in giving through free will, not forced giving. He gave from the heart out of love, which is what He wants from us. He didn’t steal other peoples money (taxes) and give it away through entitlement programs.
    .
    Fine, Dwayne. When the time comes, be sure that you’re first in line to step up and tell Him what he REALLY meant.
    .
    Read the Parable of the Rich Young Ruler, (Luke 18:18-29) where he told that person “You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
    .
    It’s also got that little item about “rich man” and “eye of a needle”.
    .
    Now… tell us once again what he REALLY meant…

  • allthingsinaname

    “Render unto Cesar what is Cesar’s, and unto God what is God’s.”
    .
    Clearly he was talking to Cesar too.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Conservatives love: the constitution – except the many parts they totally disagree with and want to change.

    Conservatives love: Religion, unless it is somebody else’s religion, like Muslims.

    Conservatives love: the message of Jesus Christ, so long as that one does not give to the poor as they did in Jesus’s time through taxes as well as through charity.

    This isn’t your father’s Republican Party.

    This is the John Birch Society and proto fascists.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    He believes in giving through free will, not forced giving.
    .
    Incorrect.

    Deuteronomy 14:28, 29: “At the end of every three years, bring all the tithes of that year’s produce and store it in your towns, so that the Levites (who have no allotment or inheritance of their own) and the aliens, the fatherless and the widows who live in your towns may come and eat and be satisfied…”

    He didn’t steal other peoples money (taxes) and give it away through entitlement programs.
    .
    Thank God that the USofA isn’t a Christian nation, then.

  • fhmadvocat

    in response to 6.2

    Dwayne,

    Jesus did not consider paying taxes to be stealing (“Render unto Caesar”) and considered the love of money to be a curse.

  • outsider2011

    Anarchy now! right Dwayne?

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    Anarchy now! right Dwayne?
    .
    As long as it was faith-based anarchy, I don’t know if Dwayne would mind.

  • hippooath

    “I think that any dream that relies on either the government or religion instead of God is doomed to fail. Jesus doesn’t expect religion or government to help man succeed or fail. He expects us to love one another and when that happens, His blessings flow. (Matthew 6:33 seek first the kingdom of God and all these things (where to sleep, what to eat, what to wear) will be added to you.) The “Kingdom” of God is in serving one another from a loving heart.”
    .
    You know that you can love your fellow man without being religious?

  • afguy

    allthings,
    .
    I don’t think a lot of the Evangelicals actually believe the Bible any more. If they did, they’d actually try to “walk the walk” rather than spinning interpretation of what they read to benefit their personal moral and life decisions.
    .
    They definitely don’t expect anything like a punishment for their conduct here, even though that’s what’s foretold.
    .
    I guess the Judgment will be reduced into a great PR and legal campaign, where their lawyers (or they) try to explain away everything they did (or didn’t do) as “freedom of choice” and not a moral requirement He levied that MOST didn’t meet (and the VAST MAJORITY didn’t even TRY to meet).
    .
    They bet their bankroll on there NOT being any accountability (certainly has been how things have worked out to this point). Maybe they can talk the Almighty into waiving the rules for them one more time. Who knows – maybe they CAN “take it with them”.
    .
    They turned their time on earth here into a giant orgy of greed, acquisition and screwing over of their fellow man.

  • afguy

    …faith-based anarchy…
    .
    You know, grape, I THINK that’s sorta where we are heade at the moment.
    .
    And I don’t expect it to take too long before those of the “authoritiarian” bent start to resent other “authoritarians” telling them what to do and turn on each other.
    .
    Those people like being chiefs – being one of the “Indians” isn’t something they do well. Or even want to consider trying.

  • blueswede04

    @6.2
    .
    In a democracy, we excercise our free will when we vote for politicians who believe in workers’ rights, sensible regulations of the market to protect workers and consumers, and a strong safety net for the most vulnerable and those who have fallen through the cracks. That’s one way to show we care. Charity alone to solve societal ills has been tried before, in Dickens’ England for example, and it has never worked.

  • allthingsinaname

    Actually there are many non-aligned church congregations . There are no controls on these preachers, that is they make Christianity what they want it to be.
    .
    It is faith based anarchy. Even Christ set up a hierarchy .

  • allthingsinaname

    afguy, see my post 8.5

  • nflfoghorn

    “Charity alone to solve societal ills has been tried before…and it has never worked”
    .
    I’d say it hasn’t worked like some would want it to work. They go hand-in-hand.
    Most governments will collect revenues from its citizens to cover basic needs. Charitable contributions help with those needs – that’s why they’re tax-deductible.

  • afguy

    There’s a LOT of people out there who want to believe SOMETHING and there’s always a televangelist or one of those “I’m OK… you’re OK” types who will make them (and their financial contributions) feel welcome.
    .
    Even where I go to church (conservative Christian) there are a LOT of people there who just seem to believe that Jesus was the first Republican.
    .
    I hear the words “Eastern elites” and “liberals” uttered too much in Bibilcan and moral discussions to think that they get MOST of their religious info anywhere except Fox and Limbaugh.
    .
    They don’t know what they believe any more – except that something’s wrong… and the “liberals” must be to blame for it.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    I THINK that’s sorta where we are headed at the moment.
    .
    Dunno about that, but I think it’s odd how US Christians have gone from asking “What Would Jesus Do?” to “Who is John Galt?”
    .
    Sad, that.

  • http://grapemusing.blogspot.com/ grape_crush

    edit: …how some US Christians…

  • afguy

    I just saw some of my hyper-conservative Baptist relatives gushing on Facebook over Ayn Rand and how “prophetic” she was.
    .
    My point is that the religious conservatives are sorta united against the “liberals” RIGHT now but I think they’ve forgotten how many flavors of Christianity there are. The country was founded by Christians leaving Europe because the Protestants and Catholics were slaughtering each other (or them, as a side-note).
    .
    Only a matter of time before Christians turn on the Jews (or Buddhists, or any of the others) or before the Baptists turn on the Lutherans, the Methodists, the Presbyterians, or any other other 57 flavors of Christianity, because they don’t like how the economic or religious pie is being divided among the “insiders”.

  • freeinpa

    Especially when you use the liberal interpretations

    ” the Bush Administration has explained how public funds can be used at religious schools — where 86 percent of the private school population is enrolled — without violating the constitutional separation of church and state.- NYT
    .
    “The so-called “faith-based” initiative is a euphemism for taxpayer-supported religion. The initiative funnels taxpayer dollars to religious social service providers without adequate safeguards to prevent proselytism.- Americans United

  • afguy

    You have to have a sense of “charity” or society stops working.
    .
    Charity used to mean taking a plate of food to a neighbor who was sick. It was called “being a neighbor”. People were simply more aware of those around them than they are now.
    .
    You “knew” something was wrong when you saw a “routine” being broken or someone wasn’t where they always were at a certain time of day.
    .
    Today, we feel a need to keep others at arm’s length and do it quite well.

  • http://publius2000.wordpress.com publius2000

    Dwayne, I think you suffer from hyper-individualism. I had a pastor who stated that God created three institutions: family, church and government. If you don’t believe the latter is a God-inspired insitution, then why did the kings of Israel need to have God’s blessing? What about all the New Testament verses that said we should respect those who have been put in authority over us?

    Yes, we should give to charities of our choice, but this does not mean that our governments should renege on its duties of protecting its citizens. And, to have such nonsense being “blessed” by right-wing thinking pastors is beyond the pale.

    My suggestion to you is that you need to grow more in the faith and not be stunted by Ayn Rand-inspired, hyper-individualistic blather.

  • blueswede04

    I’m all for charity and volunteerism. It’s the notion that private charity alone can address poverty, lack of healthcare, poor workplace conditions and what not that I take issue with.

  • taxedmore

    I hope the food they are not using is being put to good use. These people always seem to forget – Everybody seems to have their reason and excuse for being “in need” of the money that somebody else expended part of their life earning. Nobody is “deserving” of somebody else’s money. Nobody is being “punished” because they cannot get “enough” of somebody else’s money.
    To those quoting from the bible – try the Tenth Commandment – don’t covet your neighbor’s property.
    Your neighbors expended a part of their life earning that property, money, whatever. You have no right to that part of their life.

  • southernbeale

    Amy, why so timid? Where I come from a “fast” to protest a political action is known as a hunger strike. Let’s call this what it is.

    And how truly ironic that American religious leaders are protesting a **Republican** budget with this radical action. Isn’t the national news media always telling us that all American Christians are right-wing, homophobic conservative Republicans who worship Free Market Jesus? I appreciate your blog post but I also fully expect this story to get buried by the national media, which doesn’t like to have its pre-fabricated notions of American religious life challenged.

  • afguy

    Oh, I agree. Neither government nor private can do the job by itself.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    i’m sure it’s only new to me, but i’m having a love/hate affair with the “beating our plow shares into swords” line.

  • 53_3

    So what you need to do is keep in mind that my urban community generates excess dollars, which go to your rural community because your tax base isn’t big enough to pay for all that infrastructure.
    .
    Including the Rural Technology Initiative(s) which helped pay for your ability to post here over the internet.
    .
    So I guess, by that same 10th Commandment, He commands that you forever farm dirt, ride horses, and dig holes in the ground to refrigerate your food?
    .
    What kind of god do you believe in?

  • 53_3

    It might not be:
    .
    The 10th Commandment, I just learned, is all about how rural (read “real”) America is coveting the money mine and others’ urban communities are generating to subsidize them.
    .
    This could really work out. Maybe we just let “real” America slide into the cesspool of abject poverty and starvation and I get to pocket 40% more of my tax dollars.
    .
    I’m really getting to like this war on income redistribution, too! It’s just too socialist for my taste….

  • afguy

    taxedmore,
    .
    I take it you and your neighbors have more than enough money to maintain the power and road infrastructure in your area by yourself? Pretty much anywhere you have or want to go?
    .
    Got your own fire department and paid for the equipment by your lonesome?
    .
    Garbage pickup? Running your own landfill? Never got any shots for disease?
    .
    How did that smallpox outbreak down the road work out? Didn’t have one? Why was that, I wonder?

  • fhmadvocat

    taxedmore,

    Haven’t you read the previous posts? How many times have we said “Render unto Caesar?” Last time I looked, the picture on any of your dollar bill denominations wasn’t yours.

    BTW, everything you own actually belongs to God. So it is important that you be a good steward with your money. Hopefully you are giving that tithe.

  • sacredh

    “The 10th Commandment, I just learned, is all about how rural (read “real”) America is coveting the money mine and others’ urban communities are generating to subsidize them.”
    .
    If you city folk quit supporting them by building their roads and paying them NOT to grow crops (i.e. sitting on their asses and getting paid for it), do you really want them moving to the city and f**king them up worse than they already are because they can’t drive to their protests in the country?

  • formerlyjames

    swiss, you have to admit it’s a catchy phrase. Madison Ave must have come up with it. But feel free to offer your own. Personally, to me, this whole thread is too weird. What Jesus and God say or want holds no meaning to me. I know good government and I know bad government when I see it, and people offering Jesus and God in support of either is just idiocy to me.

  • sacredh

    “What Jesus and God say or want holds no meaning to me.”
    .
    You’ll change your tune in January of 2013 when you get smitten by Mittens.

  • formerlyjames

    sacredh, I should have more accurately said, “What religious idiots argue that god and jesus say…”.
    .
    But anyway, I don’t know about 1/13 and Mittens. What is that?

  • Friar Tuck

    BTW, everything you own actually belongs to God.
    .
    Ain’t that a b!tch.
    .
    Nothing that’s “mine” is mine. You have to laugh at self-identified Christians who complain that the government is spending “their” money.

  • sacredh

    “But anyway, I don’t know about 1/13 and Mittens. What is that?”
    .
    That’s when President Romney gets sworn in.

  • sacredh

    “BTW, everything you own actually belongs to God.
    .
    Ain’t that a b!tch.”
    .
    What the hell does God want with my riding crop and cat-o-nine tails?
    .
    Btw, nice to see you back Friar Tuck.

  • Friar Tuck

    I poke my head around the corner occasionally when the Clarence Thomas of Time blogging-heads makes one of her posts.
    .
    I’m guessing here, but I think God probably files most of your stuff under “The Human Comedy,” particularly when you get your MIL involved. If the El Supremo finds it offensive, there’s always recycling (dust to dust!)

  • sacredh

    “I poke my head around the corner occasionally when the Clarence Thomas of Time blogging-heads makes one of her posts.”
    .
    Don’t get me started on another rescue mission to the Vatican dungeons.
    .
    “I’m guessing here, but I think God probably files most of your stuff under “The Human Comedy,”
    .
    And here I thought they got labeled as Toxic Sludge.

  • apr2563

    freeper: Does that mean you don’t think Martin Luther King and other clergy should have marched on behalf of civil rights? Should Caesar Chavez not fasted for farm worker rights? Maybe Ghandi was wrong to fast to protest the Raj. The Irish fast to end discrimination in Northern Ireland against Catholics was wrong?
    .
    If you don’t understand the difference between speaking from morality for the poor and demanding adherence to a theocracy, you are beyond understanding.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Freak,
    .
    The government has always and will continue to – without objection – assist faith based organizations doing social services so long as they continue to put up an accounting firewall between their evangelizing and their social work.
    .
    In the Northeast Corridor, about one third of the hospitals (by my own estimate) are run by the Catholic Church. However, all money going to priests (which isn’t that much since they are unmarried men) church buildings, organs, the Saint Patrick’s Day dance are raised privately even if it is across the street and, sometimes even cautiously separating an individual administrator’s hours between being paid by the hospital, which gets federal subsidies, and the church which does not.
    .
    The “faith based initiative” allowed that firewall to come down. This meant that some storefront church could have it’s minister spend half of their time evangelizing and the other half running a youth sports team and get 100% of his pay and rent on his storefront paid for with tax dollars.
    .
    Nobody wants their tax dollars to pay for somebody of another religion to knock on your door to convert you or to hand out fliers on the street about why their church is the best and yours isn’t.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Tax,
    .
    Who do you think it is easier to get a free lunch from?
    .
    1) Your volunteer, sweet kids running a homeless shelter who do not check social security numbers to find out that there may be even millionaires sneaking in to gobble up the food?
    .
    or
    .
    2) A government agency which requires ten thousand forms to be filled out before you can get $9 worth of food stamps.
    .
    Get real.
    .
    The government protects taxpayer money and if you lie to them, you go to jail for fraud while if somebody lies to the preacher’s son his girlfriend at the soup kitchen, you might, at worst, get some dirty looks.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “do you really want them moving to the city and f**king them up worse than they already are because they can’t drive to their protests in the country?”
    .
    Interesting idea.
    .
    I am split on what would happen.
    .
    Half of me says that they would bring suffering and misery to urban life, but, the other half of me figures that when they discover that Muslims fix cars, pour coffee, fix computers, do accounting just like anybody else and if two gay dudes down the street lock their door and don’t make any noise about it, if you don’t think about what they are up to, you won’t be too grossed out about their gay sex and, eventually become liberal.
    .
    Hard to say.
    .
    I tend to lean toward cities make people liberal and rural areas turn most people into conservatives, but, to be safe, lets keep the conservatives in the cornfields to be safe.

  • formerlyjames

    I am happy to see you 2 meet up again. The ultimate heathen infidel and the good friar. It’s been too long.

  • sacredh

    formerlyjames, I may be mistaken, but I think the good friar and I agree on far more things than we disagree on. We could be identical twins if we weren’t completely different.

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    8.1-8.10 I’m definitately not anti-government or an anarchist. I was responding to the person who said that the GOP doesn’t care about me. The GOP and DNC aren’t the government they are political parties. I fully respect those in authority over me and I also respect the freedom to vote for those with whom I agree.

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    6.3 I didn’t suggest that the poor are stealing from the rich. I said that Jesus isn’t a socialist. He gave from a willing/loving heart. He wasn’t forced to do anything. He didn’t give compassion because people deserved it. He gave compassion because he loves us regardless of what we deserve.
    6.6 I would never presume tell Jesus what He meant. However, in the scriptures you referenced, Jesus didn’t force the young ruler to give everything away. He forced the ruler to choose between love or money and the ruler seems to have chosen money.

  • http://whileiblog.wordpress.com Dwayne Castle

    8.1-8.10 I posted my general response at 6.11.
    8.10 I’ve never read/heard Ayn Rand and I’ve not looked up the definition of Hyper-Individualism. I do agree with you that the government has a duty to protect its citizens. I believe even more so that we as individuals have a responsibility to care for our neighbors (regardless of their religion- as 9.0 patric appears to be saying). I know that there are many who are quick to spend other peoples money, or demand in which manner it be spent but aren’t as free with their own. I don’t know how anybody can disagree that the benefits of willingly giving of ourselves is much better than the benefits of forced giving.

blog comments powered by Disqus