House Republicans Hold the Line on Spending Cuts

TPM’s Brian Beutler reports that House Republicans are prepared to reject a White House offer to cut more than $30 billion from the federal budget over the remainder of the 2011 fiscal year. The sticking point, Beutler writes, is a dispute over whether some of the money should come from mandatory spending programs:

Democrats are pushing for such cuts, which include the big entitlement programs, though the specific cuts they’re proposing remain unclear. In an ironic twist, Republicans oppose those cuts and want to limit the negotiations to non-defense discretionary spending, a smaller subset of the federal budget.

(The irony, of course, is that the GOP has pledged to include provisions to reform entitlement programs in its own 2012 budget, slated for a roll-out early next month.)

With the prospect of averting a shutdown darkening by the hour, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid blamed the impasse on the GOP’s Tea Party wing. “The biggest negotiation isn’t between Republicans and Democrats, it’s between Republicans and Republicans,” the Nevada Democrat said. “The infighting between the Tea Party and the rest of the Republican Party, including the Republican leadership in Congress, is keeping our negotiating partner [from] the negotiating table.”

Reid certainly has cause for frustration. House Republican leaders have used the specter of a Tea Party revolt to pull off a coup: they’re poised to get everything they originally wanted, plus additional concessions should they cajole their conference into accepting them. Less than two months ago, House Budget Chair Paul Ryan unveiled the party’s target figure for 2011 spending reductions: $32 billion. It’s roughly the same sum House Republicans are now balking at. For all the predictions that the Tea Party would box John Boehner into a corner, Republican leaders have so far wielded their rank-and-file hard-liners as a negotiating weapon. Of course, it’s hard to say how much control Boehner actually exerts over the Tea Party caucus. By raising the stakes of the spending debate ever higher, they could just as easily be setting the Speaker up for a bruising fall.

Related Topics: Budgets, Harry Reid, John Boehner
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    For the sake of the bigger picture, it’s worth noting that, in the current context, with gov’t bond rates at low levels, unemployment at a crisis level, low interest rates, and businesses hoarding cash despite rising corporate profits and skyrocketing stock prices, cutting government spending is completely insane and contrary to basic Econ 101 principles.
    -
    And, of course, we could balance the budget without too much work– return tax rates to pre-Bush Tax Deferral levels, stop occupying foreign countries that hate us, and we’re most of the way there. See: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/11/13/weekinreview/deficits-graphic.html?choices=809205qv

  • Ivy_B

    Digby as usual has a lot of great perspective. The whole post is worth a read.

    So now they’ve come back with another 20 billion in cuts. As I wrote at the time:

    I think that tax cut “deal” may have made the administration stupid.

    The GOP objective isn’t to “get a compromise” or “split the difference” so everyone in the Village will drool all over them because they are so awesomely bipartisan. It’s to get what they want. They really, really, really wanted those tax cuts for the wealthy and they got them. Now they really, really, really want spending cuts.

    Arguing over semantics or even arithmetic with these people is to fundamentally misunderstand how they operate.

    If this keeps going on this trajectory, when all is said and done you are probably going to be asked to clap very loudly for a deal that is essentially draconian cuts in government at the worst possible time in exchange for not cutting some programs you like. That’s what constitutes a “victory” for a Democratic president and Senate these days. The good news is that Gloria Borger and Andrea Mitchell will say it’s a brilliant example of bipartisan compromise and the president’s approval ratings will undoubtedly improve for at least two weeks. So that’s something.

    Update: Dday adds even more context:

    There’s no question that Republicans played the “Bad Cop, Insane Cop” game very expertly. But it was apparent from the moment that Democrats allowed the 2011 budget to be decided on the watch of the new Republican House that there would be a massive reduction like this. They failed to finish a 2011 budget resolution as part of the deal for extending the Bush tax cuts for two years. They failed to incorporate an increase in the debt limit into that as well. As a result, they forced themselves to negotiate with a bad hand. And they’re not the best negotiators in the first place.

    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/big-deals-budget-talks-go-exactly-as.html

  • http://nakedempire.wordpress.com nakedempire

    lets move beyond money……..bankers are not needed….

    http://nakedempire2.blogspot.com/

  • square1

    The administration isn’t stupid. They just don’t want what you want.

  • sacredh

    Before I left work this morning they having an interesting discussion about the Tea Party and the budget cuts. A couple of the younger guys are gung ho supporters of the Tea Party. Three guys had planned to retire at the end of the year. One of them said this morning that he was worried about his retirement getting cut so he isn’t going to retire for a few more years. I hit retirement age last June and I decided not to retire because of the same concerns. We had another guy postpone his retirement last year because of the exactly same thing. There are only 16 employees where I work.
    .
    We’ve got 2 more guys in their 60′s that decided a couple of years ago that they wouldn’t retire until they were physically unable to work anymore. There’s a third of the employees that aren’t making way for the younger guys. If we get a budget cut, they’ll be the first to go. Us older guys aren’t leaving because we don’t like what we see and the direction we’re heading. The younger guys (30′s and 40′s) are cutting their own throats by voting against their own best interests.
    .
    Counting holidays, Sundays and shift differential, we make over $8000 a year more than the guys that are waiting for us to retire. They want us to retire. We want to retire, but government employees are high on the hit list of the republicans so we’re not going. The guy that announced this morning that he changed his mind had a few words for one of the younger guys that groaned when he said he was staying. “Go ahead and moan. Go to your Tea Party rally. You’ll have all the free time you want when you get laid off”.

  • nflfoghorn

    Tax cuts and spending cuts DON’T WORK.
    .
    Tax fairness combined with minimal spending cuts ACROSS THE BOARD have worked. And WILL work.
    If only we had somebody with enough guts….
    _________

    This is the Tea Party.
    .
    This is your brain on the Tea Party.
    .
    Any questions?

  • apr2563

    Republicans: Those nasty Dems want to cut SS.

  • 53_3

    touche…

  • 53_3

    Republicans: Those nasty Dems are racist.

  • 53_3

    Republicans: Those nasty Dems started the Great Recession.

  • sacredh

    53_3, they’re closing a couple of installations in our district this year and they’re giving the guys that work on them the opportunity to transfer. Unless there are more retirements than they expect, the younger guys are going to be out the door. They’re voting for republicans that want to cut their wages, benefits and the workforce and yet expect the democrats to protect their jobs. It makes no sense to me. They also want us to retire when we face some uncertainty about our retirement so that they are safe. I don’t know what world they’re living in, but it isn’t the real one.
    .
    I am concerned about them and their families, but I’m more concerned about me and mine. There’s another guy that has a daughter that’s only had next year left before she gets her teaching degree. With all the attacks on teachers and possible pay cuts, she’s decided to switch to nursing. He’s looking at a wasted three years of college and he’s going to have to foot the bill for several more years of college. He was planning to go in three years but he thinks that is out of the question now. Those clowns are voting themselves out of their jobs. I wish them luck in finding another job making 50+k a year with the benefits we have.

  • sacredh

    On a related topic, when I talk to people at other installations, it’s the same story. Retirements are getting delayed or taken off the table. It amazes me that they’re thinking that things will just “work out”. For things to work out for them, we’re going to have to put their welfare above that of our own and our families. To me it seems more like an alcoholic expecting a neighbor to give up their food money so that they can stay drunk.

  • paulejb

    Harry Reid on the horror of spending cuts.
    .

    .
    Spending cuts will mean that tens of thousands of people will cease to exist.

  • textee

    Fairy Reid has gone from giving aid and comfort to the enemy in Iraq who were killing and attempting to kill American service personnel (even going so far as to declare that America’s military had “lost” to Reid’s allies, i.e., America’s terrorist enemies in Iraq) to now giving aid and comfort to enemies of the American taxpayer, to wit: the blood sucking parasites (aka Democrats) who confiscate the property/wealth of the pro-America community.

    I hereby request that all Democrats affiliated with the pro-America community stand up to Fairy Reid and his mind-numbed band of America hating allies, to wit: the pagans, the atheists, the marxists, the socialists, the tree huggers, the earth worshippers, the flag burners, the draft dodgers, the race baiters, the race hustlers, the America haters, the al Qaeda lovers, the Washington/New York/American press corps and the fundamentalist homosexualists.

  • paulejb

    Harry Reid on jobs…
    .

    .
    What?

  • paulejb

    What Harry Reid thinks of you…
    .

    .
    He mat be right about some of you.

  • textee

    Add the red-eyed, frothing at the mouth, hysterical feminists to the aforesaid list of Fairy Reid’s America hating allies.

  • paulejb

    Okay – Try this instead…
    .

  • paulejb

    Remember people — Cutting $61 billion from a $3700 billion budget will mean the end of life as we know it..
    .
    And if you believe that, we have some seaside property in Utah that might interest you.

  • pintortwo

    House Republican leaders have used the specter of a Tea Party revolt to pull off a coup: they’re poised to get everything they originally wanted, plus additional concessions should they cajole their conference into accepting them.
    .
    Utterly, completely and sadly.. this is not surprising. Whatever the elite corporats want, that’s Congress will provide. The elected just look to assign blame or take credit as they can along the way.
    .
    .
    .
    Hey, has anyone heard about how that Coburn ordered GAO report (link) detailing budgetary redundancies -believed to show about $100 billion of trimable waste- has effected either party’s budget proposals…? If they answer is that it has had no effect (as I expect) they we can conclude neither party is concerned about the deficit or govt efficiency– only elections.

  • paulejb

    pintortwo@14,
    .
    Wrong. The last thing that big corporations want is a cut in the Federal Budget. They certainly have no desire to see a smaller government. Big government and big corporations go hand in hand. Government regulations squeeze out small businesses. Government taxes prevent small businesses from growing..
    .
    No, pintor, the last thing big corporations want is a smaller, less intrusive government. That would mean that they would have a more vibrant competition.

  • pintortwo

    Paulie, “smaller govt” means less progressive taxation and more tax loopholes. It means no penalties for polluters. It means banks can do what they want without repercussion. It means no public option to compete with. No anti-trust laws. No limit on political/lobby donation and 527 spending.
    .
    Big corporations want less govt money going to us and more to their businesses –expensive healthcare, military construction, overseas oil exploitation, etc. A lack of govt regulations means that smaller corps can’t compete on a level playing field with the bigger cos which can collude to their advantage. The most important thing big cos, including media, want from the govt is smaller, less intrusive governing as to eliminate vibrant competition- they certainly don’t want to compete with smaller companies. A dwindling middle class (with less discretionary income) is what prevents small businesses from growing.
    .
    Big corporations invest billions in election coffers, think tanks, “grass-root” movements and commercials to legitimize “small government”, which is their media-friendly wording for an oligarchy which they control.

  • pintortwo

    Back to the Coburn report– has it effected the budget proposals?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    America’s chickens coming home to roost.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Speaking of drunks, it is a drunken remark from two thirds rocks – with the rest of the tumbler filled with Vodka.
    .
    I thought you’d quit posting, two thirds.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Remember people — Cutting $61 billion from a $3700 billion budget will mean the end of life as we know it..”
    .
    No.
    .
    Please send a link to that rather than the same Harry Reid quotes over and over.
    .
    I do remember that as soon as the Tea Party got control of congress cutting spending would create jobs.
    .
    I am wondering when that will happen.
    .
    Considering that is exactly the opposite of reality, it would most likely happen when gravity goes up instead of down.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Lay off the thinking dipsh1t. It only makes you dumber. Your fairness doctrine hasn’t taken effect yet, I’ll post whenever the f@ck I please.

  • allthingsinaname

    They are going to do what Obama wouldn’t and the American Public is getting screwed.
    .
    Sorry Obama screwed us.

blog comments powered by Disqus