The Devil You Know Is Better: News Edition

For years there has been a constant grumble, which raises to a strident squeal in election cycles, about how people today only seek out news that reaffirms their own views. A related, more troubling worry is that as people consume this reaffirming news, they are under the impression that it is full of unbiased, non-partisan facts. But survey results on the Internet and the 2010 campaign, out today from Pew, give us hope that the latter isn’t really a concern — and evidence, if we needed it, that the former is happening.

When asked whether they usually consume news that shares their point of view, differs from it or has no point of view, the majority of both Democrats and Republicans said they sought out like-minded news. Sizable chunks of both groups also said they sought out news that differed, leaving only about 25% of the news consumers believing that they were frequenting unbiased sources.

For my money, there would ideally be many more unbiased sources out there to choose from — and more people willing to seek them out — but so long as consumers are getting slanted coverage, it seems reassuring that they know it’s slanted.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / White House

    Obama’s Persuasive Powers on Gay Marriage Manifest in Maryland

    When President Obama endorsed gay marriage earlier this month, the media grappled with two basic political questions: Was his personal “evolution” a case of  a politician transparently following a national trend toward accepting same-sex unions (accelerated, perhaps, by his chatty number two), and would it hurt his re-election chances by alienating socially conservative voters like black churchgoers? Sure, there was a recognition that it marked a gratifying moment for gay marriage advocates—as well as some grumbling about the President’s view that it remains a state issue, not a federal one. But by and large, there were few suggestions that one man, even the President, would shift public opinion on the issue or affect public policy. Based on a new Public Policy Polling survey out of Maryland, it seems this possibility was underestimated.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Cherokee Zero

    Apparently, Massachusetts voters don’t mind that Elizabeth Warren foolishly identified herself as a Native American early in her academic career–it was, apparently, a case of family pride and wishful thinking about a Cherokee ancestor. That’s good. Warren may be the best public figure when it comes to explaining the depredations of the financial industry and [...]

  • nflfoghorn

    I choose to get news from…
    truthful sources.
    Is that wrong?

  • afguy

    I’m interested in the viewpoints they express and how well they support them with facts.
    .
    Sneering while you present a point of view doesn’t wear well with me, either. Kinda implies you are having to reach for the “emotional’ button to elicit support.
    .
    Consistency of viewpoint is a good one too. Contradicting last week’s opinion because you have a different guest on today is morally shabby, to say the least.

  • http://gum0nshoe.wordpress.com gumOnShoe

    The proof against

    A related, more troubling worry is that as people consume this reaffirming news, they are under the impression that it is full of unbiased, non-partisan facts

    Is that people say they can tell the difference in a poll?

  • mccainfluffer

    It’s best to leave the news reporting to serious sources, such as the Time Warner Corporation. Thanks to the wise elders of establishment, even the uncultured, unwashed masses are able to understand the conventional wisdom of our elite overlords.

  • newfreedomblog

    Hey Katy, guess whose back in the news??
    .

  • shepherdwong

    For my money, there would ideally be many more unbiased sources out there to choose from.
    .
    You know, doing a post on media bias and public perception without even mentionoing the 800 lb.-gorilla of the right-wing lie machine that has driven a third of the country – literally tens of millions of Americans – functionally insane on science and government, leading to one of the greatest political crises this nation has experienced in modern times, seems…incomplete.

  • truevcu

    Oh wow! This is relevant to absolutely nothing!

  • m0mentom0ri

    It has the word ‘black’ in it. That’s all it takes for Rusty Rod to freak out and post this over and over and over again…
    .
    Oh wait, Rusty Rod likes Allen West, the disgraced Iraq vet who’s a Tea Party fave. He’s black, so Rusty’s not a racist. Well, as long as its someone who toes the Tea Party line, anyway. The rest must be those ‘welfare Blacks’ he likes going on about.
    .
    I’m curious Rod, was Rev Jeremiah Wright born in Kenya, too? Have you seen his birth certificate?

  • freeinpa

    Just one question. How do you know they answered the poll honestly?

  • newfreedomblog

    I don’t have a clue where the great Rev Jeremiah Wright, one of your idols was born, mori-the-moron, why don’t you clue us in on his bio.
    .
    Great black men in history:
    .
    1. Frederick Douglas
    2. Martin Luther King, Jr
    3. Alan West
    4. Herman Cain
    .
    Some not so great,
    1. Louis Farrakhan – vile racist and anti-semite
    2. Rev Jeremiah Wright – another vile racist, anti-semite, and a marxist/socialist as he now admits
    4. Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, First American Black President, clueless, sat in Rev Wright’s Church for over 20 years and now states he didn’t know what was going on in there.
    3. Mori-the-moron stooge and follower of these three great buffoons of American Black History of all time.

  • freeinpa

    What would a day be without ShepDong and one of his conspiaracy boogeymen: Right wing news, Corporatists, Wall St.

  • afguy

    THAT question could be asked about ANY freakin’ poll.
    .
    Especially those sampled around supper time…

  • freeinpa

    “THAT question could be asked about ANY freakin’ poll.”
    .
    True but I find this one especially laughable since it is entirely dependent on how one interprets whether on online source has a particular point of view based on their point of view.
    .
    “For my money, there would ideally be many more unbiased sources out there to choose from”
    .
    And I am sure the author of this post believes she has no point of view nor does this site.

  • deconstructiva

    The Devil Wears Pravda?
    (the original USSR one, of course, until Yeltsin shut it down, not the recent reincarnations) Thanks for the post and wordplay opportunity, Katy.

  • http://tisias.wordpress.com tisias

    Hmm, I am going to incorrectly extrapolate that while democrats more often deny the fact that the news is slanted, republicans go out of their way to listen to news is biased in a way they agree with.
    .
    Not altogether unsurprising, amirite?

  • truevcu

    I was actually just thinking the exact same thing. The results are encouraging but have to be taken with the grain of salt that everyone wants to say they’re fair and balanced.

    Except, evidently, republicans.

  • freeinpa

    “Except, evidently, republicans”

    .
    You figured it out. The only ones who may not have lied in this poll were the Republicans.

  • freeinpa

    See 6.4. The only ones telling the truth again are the Republicans

  • shepherdwong

    Right. And “class warfare” is working-class people talking about the class war.

  • apr2563

    I have tried watching Fox. But 1 minute in my heart rate accelerates, my blood pressure boils, and my brain begins to rot. That is just watching Fox and Friends.
    .
    I used to read NRO everyday and sometimes have email exchanges with their opinionators. However, after Buckley died it became as crazy as Fox. Had to stop reading it. Katherine Jean Lopez. Enough said.
    .
    I read the Daily Dish everyday. Sullivan is a social liberal and fiscal conservative. How does that fit in the cozy catagories of the poll? Also, how does Swampland fit into their definitions? How do the NY Times and WaPo fit into their definitions?

  • sacredh

    I get my news from here. Sometimes from the threads, mostly from the comments section. The networks have too much spin for me. I sort through the stuff and decide for myself what I should believe.

  • liberalmeltdown

    Who are these people that believe that their news is unbiased and what are they consuming?
    .
    I hate to tell you but they are the ignorant ones. Unbiased news doesn’t happen.

  • squirmz

    For the most part I agree with you on this, but this past year I discovered a news source that was shockingly unbiased. Now I will admit that until I recently moved to the capitol area, within the past year I was blissfully ignorant of many imprtant matters. News and current information just wasn’t a priority.

    But for a bunch of religious wingnuts, the Christian Science Monitor is a very refreshing news source. I’m sure most of you here are well aware of it as a news source, but to a person just making himself aware of the wider world of politics and news, it was a revelation.

  • mccainfluffer

    What confuses me is that Obama is apparently a secret Muslim, yet he is somehow secretly controlled by a Christian preacher. Amazing!

  • omgamike

    I agree. I use multiple sources to try and get at the truth. Though, I must admit to having given up hoping to get unbiased news from Fox News.

    I use CNN, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Daily Beast, the Huffington Post, Politico, etc.

    I also get irritated when someone just throws out blatantly partisan comments that are not backed up by facts. Being partisan is fine with me, just back up your comments.

  • omgamike

    Sad but true. Too many people are too easily swayed by the corporate liars. Wish there was a way to completely get rid of that 800 lb. gorilla.

blog comments powered by Disqus